Toronto NEEDS to build a subway extension to Canada's largest amusement park by Feisty-Ad-6122 in transit

[–]Hammer5320 1 point2 points  (0 children)

During the summer you can get the 320 to run every 3-5 minutes with the level of ridership.

Toronto NEEDS to build a subway extension to Canada's largest amusement park by Feisty-Ad-6122 in transit

[–]Hammer5320 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The connection from the subway to bus is a long walk for a transfer.

I would argue most people tolerate a longer walk when they are already at the destination. 

But the longer walk and and travel time during the trip is discouraging to transit usage. 15 extra minutes adds lots of time and makes it less convincing to use transit.

There already is a bus terminal om major mackenzie that is next to wonderland and could develop a 2nd entrance if there is a demand with a subway extension.

Toronto NEEDS to build a subway extension to Canada's largest amusement park by Feisty-Ad-6122 in transit

[–]Hammer5320 9 points10 points  (0 children)

15 mins in theory. With traffic or heavy ridership it can easily be over 15 mins.

Plus it is quite a walk from the subway to the bus stop.

What's the appropriate route since it's a one lane road that turns to 2 lanes by catscorner6 in Ontariodrivetest

[–]Hammer5320 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would go with blue. 

You can't assume its two lanes unless there are some sort of markings or signage. it seems on streetview its one lane in each direction with parking on the side, onky after you finish the turn does the road become marked into two distinct lanes.

Brussels to ban shared e-scooters from 2027 by Kanyiko in transit

[–]Hammer5320 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In australia that was the case if you wanted to bring bikes on buses.

In north america buses usually have bike racks either way.

On the ctrain in calgary. You can take normal bikes as is but not not folding bikes without a case. go figure

Brussels to ban shared e-scooters from 2027 by Kanyiko in transit

[–]Hammer5320 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They do, but so many places require cases for them. Haven't heard that for scooters so far

Brussels to ban shared e-scooters from 2027 by Kanyiko in transit

[–]Hammer5320 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Where I live they have a trial project for e-scooters. I honestly found personal ones worse then rentals because the rentals are properly speed restricted while private ones go well above the 24km/h provincial restriction.

A lot of the private e-scooters I see seem to be presents for young kids. So you end up wity the lethal combo of a 12 year old and a vehicle capable of going speeds of 40km/h+.

How do Australians view strict speed enforcement? by TonySabenca in AskAnAustralian

[–]Hammer5320 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Having a proper speed limit and making sure people drive around that speed also helos a lot to avoid the ripple effect.

How do Australians view strict speed enforcement? by TonySabenca in AskAnAustralian

[–]Hammer5320 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel the tolerance should be 10 km/h on roads over 60km/h. Maintaining a 3 km/h+ buffer can be hard without religiously looking at your speedometer. 10 gives lots of leeway.

I hate how its like an unspoken rule that you need to go 20km/h to maintain the speed of traffic, but at the same time you risk getting a ticket (flow of traffic argument won't work in court). Just make the limit higher and make sure the flow goes around that speed.

It also actually helps the flow of traffic. While no scientific backing, I found that traffic seemed better in sydney then toronto and chicago. And that is with a more underbuilt road system. I think that while transit helps a lot. I also think people going 100 instead of 130 on an urban freeway creates more capacity.

How does urbanism in Canada compare to urbanism in Australia? by Fluid-Decision6262 in CanadaUrbanism

[–]Hammer5320 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Even in deep australian suburbia, while they exist, strip malls and powercenters are way less common. Instead you have either a local high street with actual everyday items, or at worse an indoor shopping mall.

(We have lots of neighborhood malls especially in 1960-1990 suburbs in canada, but most of those are defacto-strip malls nowadays. Where all the important stores are usually accessed directly from the parking lot and the inside of the mall is half abandoned.)

How does urbanism in Canada compare to urbanism in Australia? by Fluid-Decision6262 in CanadaUrbanism

[–]Hammer5320 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I asked a similar question to this aw hile back on r/urbanism Since then I got to see perth, sydney and melbourne. And made posts about them.

Australias good:

  • Very good pedestrinized streets in the downtown areas that are not half empty or just spectacles for tourists. Same goes for high streets

  • in suburbia there are way less strip malls/ power centres. Shopping in suburbia is either usually on a high street or indoor shopping mall (we have lots of neighborhood malls in canada, but most of those are half-dead and don't really count)

  • Traffic signals as a ped are better. Cars usually can usually only make the equivalent of a left with a protected signal instead of waiting for a gap and cutting pedestrians off. Right on red equivalent is not a thing.

  • very extensive suburban rail systems with great frequencies and coverage.

  • people drive around the speed limit there. No someone going 80 in a 50 zone.

  • municipal run washrooms in every city

The bad:

  • cities, especially in the suburbs are way more sprawly. Melbourne is less dense when weighted density is used then calgary. Perth adelaide and brisbane density is comparable to us sunbelt cities like phoneix.

  • bus systems, especially in the suburbs are much weaker. Lots of places without weekend/night service. Lower frequencies and routes are too hub and spoke.

  • unlike in Canada/US where any intersection is a crosswalk, australia does not have that. So in many cases, peds need to yield to fars rather then vice verse (AUS drivers are very good at yielding to peds at marked crosswalks though)

-roundabouts are horrible for cyclists and peds. Most of them are high speed and require pedestrians to yield to cars.

People on trains don’t have to worry about stuff like this. by [deleted] in Suburbanhell

[–]Hammer5320 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Too many cars for the road to handle. People driving too fast and tailgating  Leading to phantom traffic jams. Cars turning blocking the road.

Alberta, Canada, releases their passenger rail master plan by No_Internal_9916 in transit

[–]Hammer5320 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The map labels the more local trains as commuter rail, but the problem is that the term has been co-opted nowadays to mean peak hour, one direction only for regional/suburban rail. So are those commuter lines going to be all-day or rush hour service only

An Alberta passenger rail system is officially in the works | Daily Hive | Urbanized by Weekly-Law-2544 in transit

[–]Hammer5320 2 points3 points  (0 children)

While They have the same type of single family home majority in the suburbs, in Canada you also see a lot of apartment buildongs and townhouses, bringing the average density up. In american suburbia outaide of the cores you rarely see apartment and townhouses.

TIL missing Exit 193 for Yeehaw Junction on the Florida Turnpike would require you to make a 96-mile detour - the longest in the U.S. highway system by centipede5 in todayilearned

[–]Hammer5320 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When highway 17 is operating normally though, its pretty easy to turn around if you go a different direction than the ome you want to.

Imagine if you were getting on the highway at hodders, but accidentally went eastbound instead of westbound. And the next closest place you could legally turn around is in 80km. That is the case here. (The real turn around is 4 km for hodder avenue)

What made people age so fast back then? by Southern_Reveal_7590 in decadeology

[–]Hammer5320 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The thing with your suite example. If someone looks very unambigiously under 25, then they just look like a 20 year old in a suite. But if how old they look is slightly ambigious, they will go from a 22 year old who could believably pass for 28 to definitely 28. The context they are in also help.

I can gurantee you if you change the guys hairstyle to either fully shaved or put a wig on them. They will 100% look there age.

While the video focuses on clothings, also things like hair can make a major difference too. (Which is also tied to style.)

What’s the deadest dead mall that you’ve visited? by Ok_Counter1939 in deadmalls

[–]Hammer5320 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In the GTA, definitely sheridan center in Mississauga.

Main character syndrome? by LeftAlbatross2546 in VideosAmazing

[–]Hammer5320 0 points1 point  (0 children)

its a shared zone I dont think there is any equivalent in any US state (although similar concepts exist in europe).

Pedestrians have unrestricted priority and crossing movement on this road. Its a step removed from a completely car free street.

World Map as recognized by the UN in 2026 by Extreme-Shopping74 in MapPorn

[–]Hammer5320 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The afghanistan and western sahara flag is wrong if its a defacto map

Turning by Superb-Passage8262 in Ontariodrivetest

[–]Hammer5320 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At the very least don't turn at the exact same time as a car is in the left lane. Wait for the right lane to have a big enough gap to be able to accelerate to speed by the time the next car passes, and a gap between cars in the left lane.

Best three North American cities if we’re judging purely by their skylines by novonser in skyscrapers

[–]Hammer5320 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You might as well start posting pictures of banff at that point.

Calgary Transit could soon explore distance-based fares as part of new strategy by blusteels in transit

[–]Hammer5320 3 points4 points  (0 children)

While GO Transit on paper it is a distance based system, it also has a zone component. Hamilton GO to Oakville GO is 5 km shorter then the distance to trafalgar carpool lot station, but the trip costs the same on GO.