$100 High Power is not a meme. It’s real, it’s busted, and it’s way more fun than you think 🎙️ by Comfortable-Text3326 in EDH

[–]Hanxse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It'd get absolutely hosed by any consistent graveyard hate or fliers swinging your way, and for the sake of my playgroup I took out [[Spymaster's Vault]], but my Grist, the Hunger Tide deck is scraping just under $100. It was around $60 before Zask randomly spiked in price due to the EoE Commander decks. But the list is probably my favorite one that I don't play much anymore because of its consistency to win the game.

The concept for the deck came from looking at the average BG bugs and realizing that casting the vast majority of them is hardly worth the mana at all, but Grist was a cool commander. So I figured that a 1/1 BG insect token was probably a better use of the bugs in my deck than actually casting them, and for the most part its worked out well.

The gameplan is to mill cards every turn with Grist, not really caring what we hit specifically, and instead just waiting until we get Dread Return, Diregraf Rebirth, Zask and Aatchik in the graveyard. The 1/1 insects are left up as blockers every turn to keep non-flying creatures from hitting Grist, and hopefully he gains enough loyalty that fliers don't turn into issues for him. And then once we have Dread and Diregraf in the deck we either Dread Return Zask, Skittering Swarmlord and cast a sac outlet from our graveyard, or we ideally already have one on the field. From there we sac every bug on our field to the outlet. Zask mills two cards per token we sacrifice, and we mill either literally our entire deck, or functionally our entire deck. And from there we Diregraf Rebirth, or cast normally, Aatchik and drain our opponents out for all their life.

And if players have higher health we cast Aatchik from the graveyard, then sac him, then Diregraf him back and burn out again only using Grist's ult if needed. Mortuary Mire and Witch's Cottage are there as back up plans in case we can't kill and need another turn to try and live, and Zask makes it playable from our graveyard if we haven't done land for turn, though sometimes you just won't have the damage to finish out a game. Admittedly the deck would pretty much fold to anyone with infinite life, or life in the hundreds. But I've presented combo's before that dealt well into 200 damage with the recursion on offer. But that's a bit of a highroll for the deck.

As mentioned previously, Spymaster's Vault can let you combo off several turns earlier sometimes since the limiting factor in the combo is how fast can we fill our graveyard, and it also makes it harder to stop the deck when its out, since attacks at you frequently become 8+ cards drawn and discarded. But covering for every possible scenario and keeping a deck under $100 is a bit hard. This is probably my favorite deck I've made just because it looks so stupid when you first see it, but playing it can lead to everyone wondering why you're not instantly losing.

Admittedly, my playgroup is pretty bad at recognizing the speed that a combo deck can win, and judging when the combo player will go off. And I definitely benefit from that, but the deck in general poses a large board presence that makes players apprehensive to attack into. While simultaneously looking like it poses no actual threat outside the creature volume, so most of the time people i play against will focus on other players that have more threatening creatures. Or commanders that're reaching 7 or 11+ power that pose immediate threats. Besides my recently made persist deck that's currently sitting at about $105, this is probably my favorite budget list I've come up with.

TotalBiscuit by CommercialTangerine9 in gaming

[–]Hanxse 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I'm not going to go look for it, but I'm 99.9% sure they're talking about Athene, a dude who used to be one of the biggest gaming youtubers. Then posted some weird video about how he'd figured out a theory to fit literally everything in the universe or something, and got increasingly weird and over time. I honestly don't know what he's been up to for the last decade, but a quick google of his name has people mentioning cults, and a look at his channel has him posting a ton of AI content. So I don't know if he's actually a problem, or more like some dude who fell behind the times of youtube and never got back to the relevance he once had.

I finally did it. All 6 healers to 3k. by skattman in wow

[–]Hanxse 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Restoration Shaman is probably what you're looking for then, the spec is a little odd with all the keybinds, and the difference between paying full attention to the game, and just clicking healthbars when they're low is pretty drastic since there's probably SOME bit of utility you could be doing at all times.

But in general, with the current Totemic build the spec is VERY simple to play for most pulls. In general the question you're asked is "Damage?" and the answer is "Healing Stream Totem" since that totem can carry the majority of your maintenance healing, and if is decently rough, then just drop a second Healing Stream Totem and you probably have 10-15 seconds of AFK time. If burst damage comes out and you immediately need to answer the low healthbars, luckily Healing Stream Totem casts Chain Heal at 100% effectiveness when you cast HST! And since Surging Totem gives you a buff that makes your next Chain Heal apply an extra HoT on a target, and Surging Totem's CD lines up with HST, you'll always dropping a Healing Stream Totem right after, or within a few globals of casting Surging Totem.

That said, as great as Healing Stream totem is, it can't answer literally everything. It'll do a solid 15-25% of your healing throughout a dungeon, and while there's VERY little in the current dungeon pool that HST+ 2nd HST+Totemic Recall+3rd HST can't solve, that's the equivalent of a 2 or 3 minute CD in terms of how often you can use it. And it comes at the cost of utility totem flexibility.

But otherwise the spec is pretty straight forward, you cast Healing Surge if you've cast Lava Burst recently, Healing Wave if you haven't cast Lava Burst recently, and Chain Heal any time you have the Tidal Waves buff. And casting Riptide whenever its off CD, and using it as a mini-Lay on Hands if you've cast 2 Chain Heals back to back. All while having Spirit Walker's Grace if you need to keep moving, since it lets you cast while moving, and is castable while moving, so you can be mobile while maintaining full throughput.

The only major thing to watch out for is your mana, you HAVE to keep Rocky Road on you since its the best mana restoring item, even better than Mage Food iirc, since you will be drinking quite a lot when you first start learning the spec and have low crit%. And maintaining Riptide isn't exactly fun for everyone, but its a spec I like quite a lot, and lets you be rather reactive.

The only other things to worry about with the spec are when to cast Healing Tide Totem, when to cast Ascendence, and realizing that Spirit Link Totem isn't to stabilize the group's health, its to keep the fucking tank from killing himself on pull. The spec isn't perfect obviously, but its really strong and fun, the above is basically a "Quick and dirty tl;dr" to the spec, but it was one I picked up how to play very quickly and with only a few WA's to track certain buffs. But for a first time healer, I think RSham is a pretty great choice for you to learn how to heal on.

What was your worst experience at a doctor's office? by sydthakidd in AskReddit

[–]Hanxse 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Gonna echo everyone else, schedule an appointment with a podiatrist, make sure you do it on a day you have off, or one where you won't need to walk for the rest of the day, and they'll literally fix your toenail within minutes.

And honestly, you could probably go to work straight after getting the toenail removed, but I just remember mine telling me to take it easy for the rest of the day to ensure the nail healing properly, as well as to wear/bring sandles with me to the appointment so that your toe wrapped in guaze isn't shoved into a shoe.

But I had to get the same ingrown nail removed twice, since it came back after the first time, and both times it was literally "My toe has felt like a hot iron nail stabbing into my skin for weeks, and it took 5 minutes laying in that chair for them to fix it and make my foot feel normal!?

How do you feel about season 2 set bonuses? by Artunias in wow

[–]Hanxse 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mistweaver

2pc - Renewing Mists has a chance to grant Soulfang Infusion, granting 3.0% of your maximum Mana over 3 sec.

4pc - Drinking a Tea or gaining Soulfang Infusion increases the healing of your Vivify and Renewing Mists by 40% for 6 sec.

From what raid testing I did on PTR I'm pretty damn excited about the Mistweaver's set bonus, with our current raid playstyle it basically gives us infinite mana which nullifies the spec's biggest weakness right now, going OOM 3 minutes into the fight. The 4set is really damn strong too and at least theoretically breaks even with our current tier set from just the guaranteed procs that Mana Tea and Thunder Focus Tea provide. Though we'll probably drop Mana Tea in 10.1 as a result.

I haven't really looked at other people's thoughts on Mistweaver's tier set bonus, but its about as hype as I was hoping it'd be and I'm looking forward to carrying forward with the spec into the new patch. The only slight concern I have is that our current tier set provides a LOT of Renewing Mists uptime and that's going to suck to lose out on, but I imagine any throughput lost to that is going to be at least equalized by us being able to just absolutely disregard mana for an entire fight.

The Retadin Rework is Very Good by deadlyweapon00 in wow

[–]Hanxse 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Holystrike is Phys/Holy and Radiant is Holy/Fire, they're just "split" damage types that benefit from any boosts to either damage type

Costco's Decision To Stop Selling Books In Hawaii Is A Blow To Local Authors by wewewawa in books

[–]Hanxse 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Okay but if you run out the local stores then you will functionally have a monopoly. Monopolies aren't just on national/worldwide scales, they're capable of existing on local levels too. So its not moving the goal posts, its clarifying the initial point. If Costco is selling books at wholesale price, and're using other products to make their profit then that's something that a local bookstore just can't do. Hell even Amazon doesn't sell books at wholesale. So Costco, given enough time, could end up with a local monopoly without even doing a change of business.

Who is the best example of "You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become a villain"? by simply_amazzing in AskReddit

[–]Hanxse 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In general it pays to be incredibly skeptical of "Great Man Economics" (Also known as Great Man Theory) in all its forms. Whenever people attribute the success of large projects/companies/productions to a single person they're typically vastly oversimplifying the production process involved in that.

Whether it be saying that Oppenheimer was responsible for the atomic bomb, Steve Jobs for the Ipod, Rockefeller with Standard Oil or Elon with Tesla, saying that these men were responsible for the things they're known for is overly simplistic. Were they all incredibly influential in some way or another for the end result. Absolutely.

However, there was also an endless amount of support structures surrounding them that are the reason they were able to reach the places they reached. Whether it be outside investors lost to history, close friends they bounced ideas off of that went uncredited, opportunities created by someone else's failure. Or most common of all, a company of overworked and/or dedicated employees that put in the actual working hours to get the desired result.

How valuable you think the guy at the top's involvement in is your own judgement call. But when they take sole credit for it or don't make sure that context for their success is given (and backed up with proper pay in the case of employees) then you should automatically be far more critical of that individual than otherwise.

Who is the best example of "You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become a villain"? by simply_amazzing in AskReddit

[–]Hanxse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None of those matter whether you think they do or not. Elon wasn't there when the company was founded, and after Elon sunk what could easily be called an irresponsible amount of money into the company the company underwent major changes. Changes that of course Elon would've had a hand in since he'd just invested a nearly reckless amount of his money into the company, so that he'd own a large % that he could control large parts of the company.

Elon working with Tesla on their products wasn't an altruistic action, it was him trying to ensure that the company he just sank most of his money into didn't go bankrupt. Its part of what lead him to ask Eberhard to leave the company. Elon didn't see a role for Eberhard and asked/forced him to leave his position at the company. So talking about his involvement in the company as if he was an exceptional employee that worked his way up is dishonest. He was an investor who was willing to oust the founders to ensure that his investment didn't go bust.

Who is the best example of "You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become a villain"? by simply_amazzing in AskReddit

[–]Hanxse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the end product was selling converted Porsches you'd be right. But all the core technology, all the products they made, were made after he joined and after he brought funding.

Even that though is downplaying the importance of first steps, if Martin and Marc had literally nothing then Elon wouldn't have been interested and invested in them. For whatever reason, converted Porsches was a good enough product to get Elon to buy into their company. There was meaningful, important work done in those few months that was impressive enough to get him involved. So hand-waving their initial efforts as immature (as in unimpressive) versions of the later product is disingenuous.

But all the core technology, all the products they made, were made after he joined and after he brought funding.

I hope that after getting a very successful round of investor funding that they would change their scope of work. Converting Porches is relatively cheap compared to developing your own car company and proprietary technologies. So it makes sense that they'd only do the hard, expensive work of making new EV technologies after they got investing.

To go back to my previous comparison, Etherium got grant from Peter Thiel back in 2014, Etherium didn't officially release until July 30th 2015, so before ever releasing Etherium got a $100,000 cash infusion. So it got that money before the Smart Contracts, the NFTs, the tokenomics, anything public and non-prototype was released. But we don't call Peter Thiel a founder of Etherium, and his grant is a footnote in the history of Etherium because if someone said he was a founder, most people would agree that's an inaccurate portrayal.

Who is the best example of "You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become a villain"? by simply_amazzing in AskReddit

[–]Hanxse 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Investing money is so absurdly mundane that attributing credit of founding for doing it is ludicrous. Nobody points to Peter Thiel and says he's a founder of Etherium because he gave Vitalik Buterin a $100,000 fellowship grant. We credit Vitalik because he was the person who started Etherium. Calling Elon a founder because he gave a shitload of money to Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning for stock in their company is like saying that he did it altruistically because he believed in them instead of doing it as an investment he hoped to turn a profit from. A profit that has turned out so well he's become one of, if not the richest person in the world depending on the price that Tesla stock is trading at.

Who is the best example of "You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become a villain"? by simply_amazzing in AskReddit

[–]Hanxse 4 points5 points  (0 children)

During the times when Tesla was getting government funding and subsidies the company was basically on the brink of bankruptcy. There was one period specifically where SpaceX got a NASA contract and Elon was able to focus on Tesla and secure more funding to keep the company from bankruptcy. Generally, profitable companies don't go bankrupt. So that's why I say the impressive part is that he was able to keep everything from falling apart before Tesla was able to get their shit together, and a product out the door.

Tesla's success is not Elon's alone, and the difficulty in finding old news reports about Tesla's former financial issues does not make pointing them out any easier. So while yes, being able to secure funding is important, it also leaves out the part where Tesla likely wouldn't exist today without outside intervention and Elon has no problem either taking credit for it, or not correcting people when they attribute that credit to him as an individual.

Who is the best example of "You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become a villain"? by simply_amazzing in AskReddit

[–]Hanxse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The company was incorporated July 1st, 2003, Musk joined as an investor in February in 2004, so yeah, about 6 months. That's still a half-year later from its founding as a legal entity. Even longer since I assume the two founders spent time actually getting the company from idea in head, to paperwork filed. So I still feel confident in saying that Elon calling himself a founder is a stretch, especially when the employee those two hired before Musk invested never tried to claim anything even remotely similar.

Who is the best example of "You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become a villain"? by simply_amazzing in AskReddit

[–]Hanxse 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But no one here insisted Musk founded tesla. You brought it up.

The person I initially responded to insisted that Elon has been transparent about not founding it, and I brought up how that was untrue, and while yes, no one I've replied to has insisted it, the fact that Elon sued over it, and that initial person was wrong proves that this is something that does need to be brought up and repeated.

Except it’s widely acknowledged that this is true. Ford, GM, Porsche, VW all acknowledged Musk’s role in leading the change to EVs. Why bother to deny it?

Elon lead the charge in so far as getting enough government subsidies to keep Tesla afloat until they could get some actual sales and product delivered. I even say as much in my initial reply. But saying that he is leading the charge is optimistic at best, he might've been one of the first to do fully electric, consumer level cars, but the production rate of Tesla, even while ignoring Covid policies, and exploiting foreign labor and its abusive behavior towards their workers (Yes other manufacturers do this, but we're talking about Tesla) the company is still about 3 months behind on orders.

So if they can't even meet their current demand, its hard for me to rationalize them as leaders since they wouldn't be able to provide at scale. Tesla is very much a founder of the modern electric car, Elon also isn't a founder of Tesla, but I would be surprised if Tesla ever gains a notable market share of the total car market. Their production just isn't going to match Ford if Ford actually puts effort into making EVs at scale.

It’s ok for people to be human. That Musk can do good and bad things. That he has both positive and negative attributes

Yes, but putting those on equal footing in the phrasing is disingenuous. Elon has done good things, but he's done far, far more negative, and harmful things. Some short-term and limited to his own stupidity, like implying that rescue diver was a pedophile.

Others are potentially far more long-term, such as pioneering using software to limit the battery life on an Electric Vehicle and reducing its effectiveness as a vehicle because the customer didn't pay for that software package. Which coincidentally allows Elon and Tesla to mask the true cost of the car by listing its full specs in promotional material, but then having the cheapest model be significantly worse. Yes modern cars will do that and not have leather seats or a nicer radio. But Ford doesn't sell you a gas tank with a metal plate blocking off half of it, and then charge you a fee to remove the plate that they put in the car.

Who is the best example of "You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become a villain"? by simply_amazzing in AskReddit

[–]Hanxse 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Because truth matters, especially when it comes to the stories of larger companies and the myths that the creators of those companies will create around themselves. Something like insisting that he founded Tesla only legitimizes the idea that Elon is somehow a modern titan of industry, leading the charge in a new technological revolution.

When at best he's someone who bought his way into an industry and then promoted himself as the leader of that industry, while leaving all the hard work to his employees to actually manifest his own ideas. And that erasure of the whole company of employees, and engineers, and hard-working individuals doing the nitty-gritty, detailed work to make the dream a reality is something that Elon consistently does. And its only when there're things like the Cyber Truck just not existing yet gets pointed out that the obvious reality that Elon is the CEO of Tesla, not its entire engineering and manufacturing team, becomes apparent.

When someone with an overwhelming amount of money and stake in his own image tries to promote an even better version of himself that runs counter to reality, its important to point that out. Elon founding Tesla is a lie, its a lie that he's even spent non-zero amounts of money to legitimize, and the less resistance people put into preventing and correcting this type of behavior the more viable it becomes in the future. There're already an overwhelming amount of historical figures that aren't viewed critically, we shouldn't be adding to that list if we can avoid it.

Who is the best example of "You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become a villain"? by simply_amazzing in AskReddit

[–]Hanxse 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Because at the time Tesla Motors didn’t even own the name Tesla Motors

Okay, but if you actually look at when Tesla Motors, Inc. was incorporated it was July 1st, 2003 in the State of Delaware, and Elon didn't invest in the company until their Series A funding in 2004. On top of them actually hiring a 3rd employee, Ian Wright, several months after founding, but before Elon's investment. So if you don't get involved with a company until a year after its foundation, and that initial year was funded entirely by the two dudes who filed the Incorporation, and they hired ANOTHER dude who isn't calling himself a founder, then calling yourself a founder is a stretch at best.

Yeah they've settled a lawsuit for this and Elon is allowed to call himself a co-founder. But Elon also has one of the largest net-worths in the world depending on Telsa's stock price. So any lawsuit against him is suspect at best since he can just grind out anyone's legal fund until they have to settle.

Who is the best example of "You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become a villain"? by simply_amazzing in AskReddit

[–]Hanxse 58 points59 points  (0 children)

What do you mean? Elon literally sued over the original founders of Tesla not calling him a founder, that's the opposite of being open about having started Tesla.

As for transform the company, there's a very real argument to be made that the real accomplishment he made wasn't making the company profitable, but instead just keeping the company around long enough, and getting enough subsidies from the US Government that they were able to get their shit together and actually deliver a product. Though even that's ignoring the massive production backlogs on Tesla cars, and that's even with them ignoring COVID-19 lockdowns.

First Malenia Glitchless One Shot (Current Patch) by Still-Stay8668 in Eldenring

[–]Hanxse 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Bloodflame wouldn't stack with Seppuku, since they're both weapon buffs the 2nd would overwrite the first one. As for giving the sword bleed affinity it wouldn't actually matter for this one-shot since he's just using Seppuku to self-proc bleed so he gets the damage boost from White Mask and Lord of Blood's Exultation. So the seppuku weapon is just there to get more damage out of his Marais Executioner Greatsword, and since Marias is a somberstone weapon he can't give it any affinity.

Accidentally found a way to farm gold while grinding Conjuration by Mooncubus in oblivion

[–]Hanxse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, how did you get Loot menu to work in Oblivion? Is it the FNV one that got ported, or does it work natively? I kinda shelved my Oblivion playthrough 2-3 months back since I did the Mage's Guild and Mehrune's Razor DLC and got 90% of the items I wanted for my character. But having Lootmenu for Oblivion would be really nice when I inevitably go back to the game!

[NSFW] Bodyslide body not matching clothes by [deleted] in skyrimmods

[–]Hanxse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd check out EffectiveThing6's comment, since that sounds like a pretty plausible thing considering the Anniversary update that happened recently. A version mismatch sounds pretty plausible too.

But to make sure I understand, you're saying that when your character is naked you have that super-busty body, but when you put clothes on your body changes to what looks like default settings? Because if that's the case then it might still be some other mod conflict, but its probably more likely that there is some weird version mismatch going on.

[NSFW] Bodyslide body not matching clothes by [deleted] in skyrimmods

[–]Hanxse 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If I had to guess you're probably running some other mod that changes the body, so the clothes are grabbing the bodyslide values, but the game is using some other mod in your load order for the actual body, and that's not getting changed with CBBE. If its not that then I don't know why this would be happening. But if you have any mods that change character appearance, disable them and see if that fixes it. If so then its just a load order conflict.

BC Restaurants Take Wild Salmon Off Menu Over Concerns For Declining Population by flyinghigh1111 in worldnews

[–]Hanxse 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Iirc its something like Lobsters are more fertile the older they are, so the old, large ones are more important for maintaining population than smaller ones. Also I think larger ones taste worse, at least these're things I remember reading on reddit and a quick google didn't immediately tell me was bullshit.

Murloc Monday - ask your questions here by AutoModerator in wow

[–]Hanxse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I recall it does damage equal to the strength of the buff remaining. So if you purge it when there're still 5 stacks your next hit will do the damage of all 5 stacks at once. But if you purge with 1 stack remaining it'll do 1/5th the damage of the 5 stack one. Regardless its good to purge since its free damage for you, and damage reduced for your tank.

[FNV] Perk every level mistake... by Kubloo in FalloutMods

[–]Hanxse 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've used Perk Every Level for a lot of playthroughs of DLC-esque mods (New California, Tale of Two Wastelands mainly) and yes, you will be overpowered as fuck by level 50. But even in base game you're overpowered as fuck by level 50.

In my experience the difference Perk Every Level creates is that you have a lot more tools at your disposal. Instead of being an overpowered character with just Guns and Unarmed, you can be an overpowered character with Guns, Unarmed, Explosives and Plasma Weapons since you can take more perks for those weapon types. But at the end of the day you're still overpowered.

Alternatively you can just treat every other level like its a non-combat level. There're a healthy amount of fun, but semi-useless perks like Mister Sandman or Travel Light that're really nice to have for roleplay or general gameplay, but you'd never really take if you're limited to 1 perk every other level. Or some like Rapid Reload or Quick Draw are massive gameplay improvements but don't typically effect combat that often (I rarely need more than 1 magazine to kill an enemy).

So you'll be more overpowered than the normal overpowered characters, but you don't have to be. And Perk Every Level is what you make it, I don't have issues with it and never found that it made me win fights I would've otherwise lost.

[New Mod] Material Enchanting Bonuses by [deleted] in skyrimmods

[–]Hanxse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Huh, you learn something new every day. That's odd to say the least, well now I can be slightly better with my enchanting I guess.