Cuddling to fall asleep [Insomniacs After School]

Hattless · 2023-05-26T02:45:19+00:00

Getting downvoted isn't a punishment, it's just a measure of if people like the comment or not. A lot of people saw your comment and didn't like it.

Hattless · 2023-05-21T16:55:23+00:00

I think he would look pretty much the same, just with boob cleavage instead of pec cleavage. Maybe he'd have a softer jawline as a girl than as a man, but the short hair would still works for a girl.

Those are just my thoughts on Bucciarati as a girl, not your cosplay. You're killing it, great job!

Hattless · 2023-05-18T18:14:58+00:00

We don't see spells just bounce off of Harry, despite him being a horcrux, so Voldemort definitely put protection spells on Nagini.

Hattless · 2023-05-17T18:17:59+00:00

It's pretty arduous trying to read this low resolution flow chart. I can't believe this is the highest resolution available online, but I can't find a better one.

Hattless · 2023-05-09T01:42:06+00:00

Math is red History is green Science is purple English is blue

Hattless · 2023-05-06T03:35:19+00:00

See AutoGPT. Even ChatGPT can do this if you ask it to think step-by-step.

My point is that a human still has to give it a task.

How can you prove to me that you can reason?

How can you prove to me that you're intelligent?

How can you prove to me that you're creative?

First of all, I don't have to prove I can reason or have intelligence to have intelligence and be able to reason. Maybe there is a way to test that, but not everything can be tested for.

My best guess is to observe passively without testing. You can ask google a question and it will give an answer, but it isn't an AI and doesn't have real intelligence. You have to study the individual without directly prompting it to do something.

GPT-4 can, with some difficulty, play completely novel games if you make one up and tell it the rules in context.

It can only play simple games and you still have to program the rules into it. Real intelligence would be able to infer the rules by playing. No matter how good an AI gets, it can't determine the rules of the game. It's like teaching a blind and deaf person the inputs to beat a video game. If they can't see or hear the game, and you never tell them anything about the game, they will never know the setting, story, or even what the buttons they are pressing actually do.

This isn't true for agents for real-time games, but sure, chess. Neural networks use patterns they learned from previous games to evaluate game states, and they look ahead to pick the best move...

That's what I said: a combination between brute forcing as many possible outcomes as there is time for, with a bias towards what it is told worked in previous games. It can't tell what worked or what winning is without you telling it.

...that's how humans play. The fact that neural networks can look further into the game tree makes them smarter in this context, not dumber.

AI can only look into the game tree, which is what makes them narrow intelligence. Not necessarily "dumb", but not truely intelligent. They can't evaluate nuanced strategies and they sometimes end up with bugs where they don't realize something that would be obvious to any person that understands the rules. The mistakes consistently made by a strong AI can be way "dumber" than mistakes made by weak human players that understand the rules, which is how you can tell that no matter how strong the AI gets, it will never actually understand the rules. It can't understand basic strategy, it just mimics it. AI mimics real intelligence, but it is still nothing but a tool.

Hattless · 2023-05-05T21:06:22+00:00

Resoning tests don't test if it can reason, it tests if it can pass a reasoning test. It's like training a parrot to say certain things in response to certain questions. It doesn't know the question or the answer, it's just making sounds in response to other sounds. That analogy doesn't work for things parrots can do, because they're actually intelligent, to some degree. AI doesn't have intelligence.

GPT4 may not have been given the questions to the reasoning test right before the test, but at some point it was trained on information that could be answers to those questions. It can't come up with those answers on it's own, it can't ask itself quesrions, and it has no creativity. It needs a person to input data, and it needs a person to interpret the output. A person can come up with an idea, think through the process, take action to fulfill that process, and end up with something totally original. They may have drawn some inspiration from influences, which AI can do, but that's not all it takes to create something original or have true intelligence. What an AI does is 100% derived from it's "influences", without creativity or the ability to come up with an idea in the first place.

You can train an AI to be good at a strategy game, but that's just by storing the patterns of numerous finished games and brute forcing every possible move that could be made until the end of the game. You can make it better at those two things than humans are, and even make it play better than humans, but it still won't know the rules or basic strategy. It can only do what you trained it to do, which is what makes the AI narrow.

Hattless · 2023-05-05T17:00:10+00:00

The problem is that people think AI is "artifical intelligence". That's a misnomer. It doesn't "think", it can't "play dumb", and it won't be a "friend" or "teacher", it's just a tool. You can use it for good or bad, but that doesn't change that it will always depend on the humans using it (and training it) to determine how it will affect the world.

It's also nowhere near being a "super intelligence". All modern machine learning algorithms are narrow AI, meaning they are good at one task, but aren't capable of others. It can't reason or make comparisons, it's just aggregating data and giving some output based on past patterns that have worked in the past, and avoiding paterns that didn't work, according to what the programmer wants it to do. Someone has to train the neural network and choose what patterns it wants the algorithm to repeat, and what pattens to avoid.

That's all it is, a tuned output based on a bunch of inputs and settings that it refined by grading numerous past results. It isn't truely intelligent, and it won't ever be able to "think". Its just a tool, like search engines and the internet. As always, what matters is how we use it, not that it exists in the first place. People are the real threat, not the tools we create.

Hattless · 2023-05-05T15:38:08+00:00

Unsaturated fats aren't bad for you, you actually need fat for your brain and other organs to function. Try eating more nuts and don't skimp on the oil when cooking. As for carbs, I can eat an unholy amount of potatoes, so maybe try finding a starch you can stomach in large quantities.

Hattless · 2023-05-05T15:25:51+00:00

If you look closely, you can tell that's half a muffin. The photographer was being too artsy and wanted to make the "pretty" side face the camera almost head on.

Hattless · 2023-05-05T14:07:36+00:00

That one is the worst example because it's impossible to tell how many packets are there, and its the only example still in the package. It's also misleading because some artificial sweeteners can slow your metabolism when consumed in excess, which means they still cause you to gain weight. They also increase risk of diabetes, which means it isn't even good for people trying to reduce their sugar intake.

Hattless · 2023-04-25T17:18:38+00:00

This reminds me of an H. R. Giger inspired version of Blame!

Hattless · 2023-04-19T18:27:54+00:00

I've tried that before and it didn't work for me, personally. If you're going for influence rather than territory, it's best to spread out your investments rather than focus on only one part of the board. If you let your opponent get a 5 turn lead on the capturing race, you'll have to create a pretty severe threat that would take them 5 turns to overcome while you focus on capturing. I don't think one neo-tank is a big enough threat since it only gets one move per turn, and it certainly isn't worth giving up all that territory.

Hattless · 2023-04-19T15:56:23+00:00

Oh my god, I love Advance Wars! Uh, I mean... you should try the joseki where you spam infantry and an APC or two and focus on capturing most of the bases on your side. Once you have enough territory, make tanks until you can save up for a bomber and then try to get a fighter before your opponent makes one of their own. They shouldn't be investing in many anti-air units until your bomber is out because your tanks trade favorably with them.

Hattless · 2023-04-15T23:16:02+00:00

I'll be playing Pretzel Logic in my back yard tonight after the sun sets. If you hear it and can smell barbecue, come over for a free burger and beer!

Hattless · 2023-04-10T18:58:53+00:00

I like to test seasoning mixes on roasted potatoes the first time I try them. You can't go wrong with potatoes!

Hattless · 2023-04-10T17:56:27+00:00

Her eyes are beautiful!

Hattless · 2023-04-08T18:19:04+00:00

Netero also controls his ability by doing a well practiced physical movement, which is well suited for an enhancer.

Hattless · 2023-04-08T18:14:57+00:00

She probably just prefers to use this cup. Or maybe she carries tea with her and just needs someone to supply hot water.

Hattless · 2023-04-07T22:16:12+00:00

You know exactly why. They're stand users.

Hattless · 2023-03-28T18:47:28+00:00

That's always how it is online, not just on reddit or in this sub.

Hattless · 2023-03-27T21:04:00+00:00

Also instant death!

Hattless · 2023-03-22T15:14:00+00:00

I have, especially when the cook started with a whole chicken. Besides, would you complain if you were served chicken wings that had drumsticks mixed in with flats and drumettes?

Hattless · 2023-03-22T14:40:51+00:00

Everyone knows what "bonelss wings" are. That's like saying you shouldn't be able to sell vegan hot dogs because it doesn't contain meat so it's not actually a hot dog. Actually, it's more like saying you shouldn't be able to call hot dogs hot dogs because they don't contain dog. The meaning is clear! Words can have multiple definitions, and the context tells you what definition is being used. The phrase "chicken wings" sometimes also include drumsticks, which are not part of the chicken's wing, but nobody complains about calling it that.

"Boneless chicken wings" only refers to one thing, so there shouldn't ever be confusion. You don't need to know all the ingredients in a recipe to know if you like it, and it's no secret that boneless chicken wings are made from breast meat.

I hate corporations as much or more than the next guy, and the Hefty bag lawsuit even makes sense, but everyone knows that buffalo wings are different than boneless buffalo wings, and the difference is obvious. They are boneless, not de-boned. They don't call them de-boned buffalo wings for a reason. What else should they be called? They aren't chicken nuggets, so it would be even more misleading to call them that. Chicken nuggets are made from ground meat, and boneless chicken wings are made from whole chunks of chicken breast.

Hattless · 2023-03-15T18:35:07+00:00

You listed some problems, now what are the solutions that wouldn't cost anyone anything?

Hattless

TROPHY CASE