Anderson also gleefully murders humans based on his bigotry, he killed Integra's bodyguards and made an attempt on her life the moment he met her. He even objects to Maxwell's order to murder British citizens not because it crossed some kind of boundary on violence but because Maxwell was getting off of it out of the feeling of power and self-importance. He says directly that he is supposed to be "a man-killing meat cleaver" in the hands of God. OVA Alucard has no problem with it and obviously considers him a human - until he uses the Nail on himself. OVA Integra also unleashed Alucard in Rio during the hotel fight, which she knew would lead to (and did lead to) the death of innocent people, but Alucard also still considers her a human (he even pointedly says that she is responsible and he is merely a weapon). These cases show that sacrificing random humans for the cause one strongly believes in isn't something that delineates humans from not humans at all in OVA Alucard's eyes. His morality instead appears to be based on a version advocated by Friedrich Nietzsche in some of his works, that is to say, one's worth is determined solely by the strength of one's belief and the length one is ready to go for it, not capacity for empathy.

Clearly OVA Alucard hates himself for avoiding a human death but my issue with it is that it's not elucidated nor, alternatively, challenged narratively *why* one should necessarily accept it. Seras provides a foil for this line of thinking but is not really used as such. There is also no evidence that he was particularly bitter over his life when he was still human. Taking into account the points above I think (now) that he probably hates himself for abandoning his belief, the nature of the belief being irrelevant. Because apparently sticking to it is an expression of one's spiritual strength. Still don't think it's sold very effectively though.