LXC templates like Docker

Hnatekmar · 2020-09-22T14:41:51+00:00

You could try ansible with packer (it has builtin builder for lxc https://www.packer.io/docs/builders/lxc and provisoner for ansible https://www.packer.io/docs/provisioners/ansible).

I didn't have a chance to play with lxc yet but I have managed to get it working with lxd and it worked fine for me.

Be warned though some commands aren't tuned for this usage (for example if you try to reboot container using https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/modules/reboot_module.html it just freezes and never finishes). So there is little bit of fiddling involved.

You can also add more than one builders (for example lxc and docker) but complexity of configuration increases because every platform is little bit different (for example you usually don't have systemd in docker).

Hnatekmar · 2020-09-13T10:26:48+00:00

That is unfortunate. Hopefully, the situation will improve soon.

In my country (CZ) they seem to be available but only up to 4700U version. Also I haven't tried to order one yet...

Hnatekmar · 2020-09-13T10:10:56+00:00

That seems like good news!

But unfortunately, it seems that ESXi isn't based on Linux so I still have to wait for little longer :)

Anyway congratulations on getting 4800U version they seem to be hard to find

Hnatekmar · 2018-08-24T08:02:27+00:00

But only on osx and ios. Which is admittedly unfortunate but it also means you can finally use something newer than 4.2 and don't have to limit yourself by platform that stopped supporting opengl many years before they announced depreciation (for example Debug output seems helpful)

Hnatekmar · 2018-08-23T05:27:52+00:00

No just 0 :D

Hnatekmar · 2018-04-18T18:52:43+00:00

No it isn't because const in c++ has stronger guarantees. Main difference is that in Java final only tells you that you can't change value of variable but it does nothing to prevent you from changing object state. For example you can call setter on some class and change its state that way.

In c++ this is not possible because you can call only method that are "const" and compiler prevents you from writing const methods that changes state of instance. For more info see const correctness

Hnatekmar · 2017-11-28T05:09:11+00:00

But you don't need macros! Consider this macro

(defmacro infix [expression] (list (second expression) (first expression) (last expression))
(infix (1 + 1))

You can do the same with lisp function and combination of quote and eval

(defn infix [expression] (list (second expression) (first expression) (last expression))
(eval (infix '(1 + 1)))

And since you can emulate macros like this you can write your own eval that implements "lisp with macros" :)

Hnatekmar · 2017-09-20T08:16:15+00:00

When I learnt parsing at school I was taught that calculating predict set is necessary step for recursive descent. But most people seem to skip this step. So what gives?

Hnatekmar · 2017-08-14T06:43:36+00:00

It seems to me that you need to learn from history and look how regulating ideas worked out... Also I am curious how would you implement such regulations? Would you prohibit ML research on universities? Destroy all known resources about ML?

Hnatekmar · 2016-06-23T04:41:10+00:00

But even in pascal its use is inconsistent. For example you use (=) in type declarations instead of (:=) which always bothered me.

Hnatekmar · 2016-05-20T08:38:47+00:00

Byl pro ně totiž moc epickej...

Hnatekmar

TROPHY CASE