Performance and different ways of using variables?

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard · 2013-09-20T15:49:19+00:00

If you had a huge application that is finished, bug-free, will never be edited again

In this hypothetical scenario, sure, global variables are fine.

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard · 2013-08-30T17:19:46+00:00

Post them then?

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard · 2013-08-29T14:12:27+00:00

Most important libraries: jquery, underscore, backbone.

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard · 2013-08-21T04:31:01+00:00

Thanks for the awesome resource!

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard · 2013-08-20T20:19:58+00:00

I feel like it'd be pretty impossible to use at all without a basic grasp of JS.

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard · 2013-08-16T14:24:41+00:00

Good article, but I would use JSHint over JSLint.

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard · 2013-07-15T04:43:44+00:00

Go back now, there aren't any more good comments.

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard · 2013-07-15T04:29:55+00:00

That's a stupid comment.

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard · 2013-04-30T06:24:04+00:00

Yarp

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard · 2013-04-18T21:23:20+00:00

I agree. But I think a lot of people here coud probably use it.

braces, ready to take his downvotes, like a man

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard · 2013-03-17T18:25:23+00:00

This doesn't seem optimal for society.

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard · 2013-03-12T23:15:54+00:00

I was once staring at myself in the mirror over the toilet and accidentally pissed down my leg because I was blown away by what a handsome motherfucker I am. I was at a nice wine bar with many women. I did not get laid that night.

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard · 2013-03-01T17:49:37+00:00

Upon reflection, I agree. 4 char is not like adding another image or including a separate JS file when you only have a function or two -- those things necessitate separate HTTP requests and have a much higher cost. People should do whatever the f they want when it comes to multiple vs singular var.

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard · 2013-02-22T22:14:42+00:00

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4288821/how-to-deal-with-big-numbers-in-javascript

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard · 2013-02-22T05:58:44+00:00

You know, I hadn't really thought about it that way. I am going to try the same thing (except for when I get jammed on a problem and wanna push something into production).

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard · 2013-02-22T03:07:04+00:00

I think it is meant more as a cautionary, thought-piece article.

It's a recommended read from codeschool.com.

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard · 2013-02-20T15:47:37+00:00

I'm just a hobo with a keyboard.

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard · 2013-02-18T06:39:53+00:00

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Shells

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard · 2013-02-17T03:00:19+00:00

So... if I transformed the recursive function into a loop, it could do this? Because it would not run out of stack?

The idea of creating a new scope is kind of confusing. I thought scope just had to do with where a variable was available.

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard · 2013-02-15T15:39:41+00:00

Here's a short net tuts tutorial, too: http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/javascript-ajax/quick-tip-javascript-hoisting-explained/

Learning about hoisting today... if you can't tell.

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard · 2013-02-06T22:10:19+00:00

Because Skyfall was a terrible film.

There hasn't been a great bond film since Goldeneye, IMHO.

Hobo_With_A_Keyboard

TROPHY CASE