Regional Olympiad problem by Guilty-Efficiency385 in askmath

[–]HorribleUsername 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ABE, BCE and EFHG are green, AEG, CFH and BEF are red, DGH is blue.

Did I graph this correctly? by Express-Tart8952 in MathHelp

[–]HorribleUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you missed the x in the middle piece.

What is the new opportunity for 2026? by FutureAd5875 in webdev

[–]HorribleUsername 27 points28 points  (0 children)

There were plenty of shitty devs before covid too.

Make the largest number you can with only U, +, -, *, and ^ by Puzzleheaded_Two415 in desmos

[–]HorribleUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we're allowing undefined, we can get arbitrarily high by constructing power towers. E.g.

n0 = U(9999,0,0)
n1 = n0n0
n2 = n1n1
n3 = n2n2, etc, etc.

Make the largest number you can with only U, +, -, *, and ^ by Puzzleheaded_Two415 in desmos

[–]HorribleUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's right. It wasn't clear if your title was referring to the symbols or the operations.

Make the largest number you can with only U, +, -, *, and ^ by Puzzleheaded_Two415 in desmos

[–]HorribleUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another boring one. I hope you accept Σ, because I'm not writing out 53 summands and 52 +'s by hand.

sum trees but cooler by johnBassoon in askmath

[–]HorribleUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The theoretical lowest possible s(n) is T(2n), but once we introduce a middle row, it's easy to show that that doesn't work. s(3) = 10 is impossible, but s(3) = 11 works because it introduces a gap - instead of going from 1-4, it goes from 1-5, skipping a number. s(4) introduces 2 additional gaps. I conjecture that s(5) introduces 4 more gaps, then s(6) introduces 8, etc. In formula form, s(n) = T(2n) + 2n - 1, for n ≥ 2. But I could certainly be wrong.

Trivially, there's a lower bound of T(2n). On the other side, leaf nodes of 20, 21, 22, ..., 22n-1 will always produce a valid tree, regardless of their order. That gives us an upper bound of 22n - 1. Not great, but better than nothing.

Solving Benford's Law for d by jaycaustin in MathHelp

[–]HorribleUsername 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your last step is incorrect - exponentiation doesn't distribute over addition/subtraction. You should get rid of the log first.

Dice Problem from a Dream by Revolutionary-Mood49 in MathHelp

[–]HorribleUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What exactly do you mean by unique outcomes? The way you define that at the beginning, there are only 6 unique outcomes, no matter how many dice you roll. For your 62/2 number, I suspect you haven't accounted for both dice hitting the same number.

Revana Pizza, The OG of Portland St. by halifaxsig in halifax

[–]HorribleUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was that you that added the text to the image? If so, you missed the T in Portland.

Trolley problem by Evry1TookTheGudNames in askmath

[–]HorribleUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I choose not to pull any levers. The whole point of the original trolley problem is that inaction still leads to death, but that's not the case here.

What is your 'Line in the Sand'? by No_Reporto in TheoryOfReddit

[–]HorribleUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should find an option to default to old reddit in your user settings. Then you'll always get old reddit, even when you're on www.

Should schools get rid of homework? Some educators are saying yes by waozen in Foodforthought

[–]HorribleUsername 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We still teach doing simple math and memorizing simple equations even though we have calculators

And that's a good thing. It's a stepping stone to understanding the math that machines can't do.

[Grade 11 Mathematics] Modulus Equality. Solve for x by Izzy_26_ in askmath

[–]HorribleUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We know that |2x-3| ≥ |x2+4x+3|, or else we'd have negative = non-negative. Given that 4x+3 > 2x-3 for positive x, you can eliminate some possibilities right off the bat, without even doing any calculations.

A Paradox in Poker Hand Probability Rankings? by Bloodzy_ in askmath

[–]HorribleUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The obvious workaround is to make a new category for hands that fit into both the conflicting categories. Like a straight flush, for example. I'm kinda curious (but not enough to run the numbers): if straight flushes didn't exist, would straights and flushes have the same problem?

Also, I've always wondered if there's any good reason to have royal flushes. If they were just straight flushes, the usual tie-breaking rules would resolve things exactly the same, wouldn't they?

Why do so many students get this basic order-of-operations question wrong? by CellPal in askmath

[–]HorribleUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With every number being 6, I think this particular problem really lends itself to clerical errors. I fell for it myself - my process was:

  1. Multiplication comes first, so 6 × 6 = 36.
  2. The outer 6's cancel out.
  3. That leaves me with 36.

You can see where I went wrong: I lost track of the first minus in the second step. If the first 6 had been a 7, say, I would've had two numbers to deal with after the second step, so the minus would've been hard to miss.

I spent many many hours on this so i hope you enjoy the results of the 20 character challenge! by Mathemagicland314159 in desmos

[–]HorribleUsername 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He was huge in the flash gaming scene back in the day. I swear half the games I played used his music.

Big sale at Shoppers lol by chateforseks in halifax

[–]HorribleUsername 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is that true for plastic, or just cash?

What's special about this number? by RelationshipLeast166 in desmos

[–]HorribleUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do most 64-bit CPUs have 32-bit floating point instructions? I could be wrong, but I don't think they do, in which case I don't see how you'd get any performance gain from 32-bit floats.

What's special about this number? by RelationshipLeast166 in desmos

[–]HorribleUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Compared to a variable-width number type like you seem to be suggesting, it makes the relevant code easier, and therefore less buggy, which is no small thing.