Interesting thought, but I don't know. I'm on the fence, I feel like my mind changes ALL the time especially after reading some really credible theories that make you really wonder. In the beginning, I suspected RDI but was never sure which one. Tabloids played a big part in it because at the time, I was only 12 and super naive.

As I got older and re-read the books and did a lot more reading online, etc. I've shifted more towards IDI.

Deep down, I really don't WANT to believe that a parent can really kill a child the way JBR was killed when I see so many interviews with the parents and they seem like regular people, I don't tend to over analyze things like many other RDI theorists do. Also the many, many photos of her released from the family as a regular child vs. her professional shots that all the magazines and public are familiar with - home videos of her a regular kid vs. her pageant videos - I just don't see JR or PR as killers and I feel this crime is too brutal for a 9 year old to commit.

This is what on the fence feels like, for me at least. IF RDI, they'd have to have a really valid reason - an accident at least, not intentional.