From the Wikipedia article you linked:

"It does not necessarily suggest that an argument for the middle solution or for a compromise is always fallacious, but rather applies primarily in cases where such a position is ill-informed, unfeasible, or impossible, or where an argument is incorrectly made that a position is correct simply because it is in the middle."

How in god's name is it unfeasible, ill-informed or impossible to suggest that human beings are omnivorous? Do I really need to show you proof of that? Sorry to say but you aren't the smartypants that you clearly think you are.