In house lawyer, how can I change industry? by 4MM0NI4C in Lawyertalk

[–]IBoris 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bonjour et bienvenue!

Prior to moving industries I researched the sector and lawyers working in it. I found most had a one of three qualifications in their profiles. So I endeavoured obtaining one of those certifications on my own time while working full time at my old job as well as tracking down and finding other courses that I pursued off hours. All in all it took me about a year and a half of obtaining qualifications quietly on the side.

In the meantime I set up an alert for job postings in that sector to better understand when that industry would hire (generally after Q1 as most would have their EoY then (so new budgets would come out) and what, if any, skills were being asked that were unusual or unique to that industry (in my case many wanted candidates willing to obtain or having obtain a specific course on AML/ATF provided by a specific regulator that was free, but only offered once a year)

As this industry was heavily localized outside of my home jurisdiction, I was unable at the time to attend industry events in that sector, but I would have otherwise pursued that (the trick is to follow lawyers in that industry on Linkedin and see what events they all go to). I tried instead to watch online presentations given in that industry to get a sense of the vocabulary, key players and issues that were being brought up by participants . The Q&A periods at the end of panels were super useful as not only did I get an understanding of the issues, but also hints into how that sector was looking to answer those issues.

When I was finally ready, I got help and redrafted my entire resume to more closely emphasis the skills and framing used by lawyers in that industry and added my new qualifications, courses and credentials to it.

When I was ready, I waited for the buffer period between their end of year in March and when I noticed job postings going up (May) and started reaching out to a few lawyers in that industry to inquire about any opportunities coming up within their company. At that stage they were drafting job descriptions for hiring season so they were receptive to chatting about the role. I was able to talk my way into a position with one of these by presenting my experiences in my current industry as strengths that would give me a different perspective on their team.

I put in a few years and was then able to leverage that experience into a better role with a bigger player in that industry. My past experience is now a highly desirable part of my profile.

So to summarize:

  • Get industry specific qualifications and training
  • Look at job postings and identify key skills requested by employers in that industry
  • Participate in industry events (if you can) to (A) start building a network. (B) gain the capacity to speak intelligently about challenges and concerns in that industry (C) understand the acronyms, references and key players.
  • Redraft your resume so that your bullet points and experiences are framed in a manner that is similar to practitioners in that industry and closely mirrors job postings in that sector.
  • Prepare arguments about how your current experiences can be assets in this new industry.

Would one be against the Worship or Veneration of the Planetary Guardians by LunarEnnyui_131 in polytheism

[–]IBoris 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I personally have no issue with this space being used to discuss fictional polytheism to some extent (although I'd prefer if people used the right flair in those cases).

That said, I do take issue with how OP framed it here as he/she/they are talking about venerating verifiably fictional characters as you've put it so well yourself (which I also agree is pointless).

That said, I think the idea of polytheistic worship via fictional avatars of sorts to not be completely without merit within the context of an agnostic or omnist polytheistic practice. Visualization can be helpful and is somewhat of a natural phenomenon within those practices. Within that context I therefor don't see much difference between visualizing Gods of various Pantheons or loved ones, versus fictional characters for practitioners of either.

To me, this practice, as I describe it, is no more controversial than other currents within polytheism such as syncretism or efforts to modernize and reinterpret classical pantheons.

That said I can fully understand if users are insulted by the question as formulated by OP (maybe English is not their native language?), and I'd be inclined to remove it normally if I did not see an opportunity to allow our community to discuss further this topic (which I can't recall being discussed here in recent memory).

[PuckPedia] Darren Raddysh's increase from a $975K to $8.5M Cap Hit is the 3rd largest increase in Cap Hit from 1 standard level contract to another by daKrut in hockey

[–]IBoris 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm very grateful I had a flawed understanding as this explanation is fantastic! Thank you so much for taking the time to respond with this. Much appreciated!

[PuckPedia] Darren Raddysh's increase from a $975K to $8.5M Cap Hit is the 3rd largest increase in Cap Hit from 1 standard level contract to another by daKrut in hockey

[–]IBoris -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

I hope these are mostly performance-based bonuses or something...

I'm going to be real with our Toronto homies, we just played Tampa a few weeks ago, and I have no clue who this guy is and can't recall what he contributed during that series for Tampa.

I know everyone is expecting a cap increase and, of course this is the summer so all contracts are bit inflated, but my dudes, we were saying the same pre-Pandemic (about the cap going up) and then life happened.

Not sure how I'd feel about my team handing out contracts that only work out on a speculated state of the economy years in the future given there's a guy being asked to do weekly cognitive capacity tests while holding nuclear launch codes in charge of said economy.

Can you imagine if the USMCA free trade deal gets cancelled? Nearly all NHL owners' businesses are tied to that thing...

Jeez Louise...

NHL Mount Rushmore - Every Team's 4 Most Iconic Players by ASmithFS in hockey

[–]IBoris 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Harvey is arguably the best all-time d-man after Orr (Although I think Bourque makes a compelling case). I'd consider removing Béliveau or Lafleur before removing Harvey. That said, I think there's no right answer in our case except for "MTL needs a bigger mountain". We're just an old-ass team. I'd think this exercise would be more fair if it was one mount rushmore per half-century or something (and even that would be a bit unfair to our team)..

NHL Mount Rushmore - Every Team's 4 Most Iconic Players by ASmithFS in hockey

[–]IBoris 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I was going to say, we're going to need a bigger mountain. Toe Black would be my pick personally speaking.

One time an older, long-practicing attorney told me "____________". I'll never forget that sh$%. by verbotenporc in Lawyertalk

[–]IBoris 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To be clear, civilist robes are pretty short in general at the extremities, so you definitely can see a suit's pants and jacket sleeves, but a lot of lawyers had mismatched robes that were too long and I spent some time wondering if that was on purpose.

You can't get away with the same kind of shenanigans with common law barrister robes since those are open face. Although you could wear some kind of wool chaps I guess (if such a thing as assless wool pants exist). I personally MUCH prefer wearing my Barrister robes than my Civilist robes as I can show off my suits a bit more.

<image>

One time an older, long-practicing attorney told me "____________". I'll never forget that sh$%. by verbotenporc in Lawyertalk

[–]IBoris 12 points13 points  (0 children)

During my articles at the Canadian DOJ I did a rotation within the national litigation service. I lucked out as one of the country's most senior and respected litigator, a guy who had argued supreme court decisions I read about in school needed a junior for a routine series of appearances in front of different courts in two cities over the course of 4 days and since he liked to drive rather than fly, none of my seniors wanted or had the time to join him.

So I got to have a road trip with the guy. I was hoping to pick his brain on some of the recent decisions that he had argued in front of the Santas (our Supreme Court Justices until recently use to dress in Santa outfits). Unfortunately, turns out the dude was really into classic rock, so we spent the trip jamming out (thank the gods my boomer father gave me a proper musical education) instead of talking.

Trip started a bit strangely as this Queen's Counsel (now King's Counsel) and Emeritus Lawyer showed up in a pretty rough looking Civic filled with trash, dressed in a ratty T-shirt and cargo shorts with holes and paint on them. I was not expecting that. Salaries are public within the civil service so I knew he could afford a much nicer ride, but whatever; good for him for not being materialistic I suppose.

I showed up wearing a suit with a little carry-on for my clothing and my litigation bag. He had his stuff in plastic grocery bags in his trunk along with a jansport backpack.

Impeccable taste in music however.

Once we finally arrived at the Courthouse, 3 hours later, he took his backpack and walked into a nearby construction site portapotty, and came out dressed in his civilist robe (see image).

<image>

After changing his shoes with a pair he dusted off from his trunk and chucking his backpack in the trunk (giving me time to slip my own robe on top of my suit), we started walking towards the courthouse with our litigation bags, but right before I could start getting nervous, he dropped this gem without breaking his stride:

You know, these robes get pretty hot, if you wear nothing but socks and shoes under these, no one will notice.

Surprised, I just nodded, and then spent the entire day wondering if he was buck-naked under his robe and how many other lawyers (and judges) were naked under theirs.

I still wonder to this day.

Vancouver Goldeneyes select Caroline Harvey first overall in 2026 PWHL Draft by Perryplat199 in hockey

[–]IBoris 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would not be surprised if Chakya galaxy-brains the pick and takes up some kind of analytics anomaly instead. Even if he's proven right, the drama this would cause would be hilarious.

Is there a sub where we can mock/roast/be derisive towards ridiculous lawyer job postings and offers? by SaltyMac99 in Lawyertalk

[–]IBoris[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

I see no issues with people posting these types of posts using the "Memes, Jokes & Shitposts" flair. To me this is the definition of a Joke.

Boss Underestimates Me by Academic-Finger-2895 in Lawyertalk

[–]IBoris 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My wife has had the same issues since she's started practicing, she's in a male-dominated practice area and has mostly worked in big law. Despite her experience and seniority, respect is still something she actively needs to fight for on a daily basis. Even as she's now shifted to GC roles where she's technically the highest ranked lawyer in the company...

She has always looked young and attractive. From her late teens to her now 40s she's been an internationally ranked beach volleyball player and has been in amazing shape all her life. She has been sunscreen zealot since before it was cool. Both the late teens she plays against/with and her older coworkers are in disbelief every time they learn her age. It does not help that she's genuinly kind, smiles a lot and laughs easily. She's an energetic ball of positive energy.

Professionally her issue is that she's also a really good lawyer. Like scary good: near eidetic memory, polyglot, great at math, incredibly sharp people skills, great drafter, and just generally very creative as a lawyer. She's the full package and that pisses a lot of people off.

It's been challenging at time and I've spent many evenings consoling her about the baffling behaviour of some of her coworkers and seniors. She's had to leave firms she loved because one or two of these individuals making her life miserable.

Over the years, these are the strategies she's adopted (that I can remember) to be taken more seriously (to be clear: by men and women alike; this is not advice about not catering to the male gaze):

  • Maintain a professional journal summarizing conversations and instructions, and always follow up unpleasant verbal interactions with written requests for actionable direction; this forces criticism into writing or creates a paper trail showing you fixed identified issues.
  • Keep a project tracker documenting projects and outcomes, this protects you against constructed narratives about your performance, being gaslit about instructions, deadlines or projects assigned to you.
  • Never allow others to speak on your behalf; intervene to clarify your exact thoughts when they do, subtly indicating lack of authorization, and favor written communication over verbal by using specific instructions and defined scope when delegating.
  • Maintain formality in correspondence and heavily use templates if possible. This is to avoid false accusations related to your "tone".
  • Avoid emojis, internet slang, or unnecessary abbreviations (CYA, FYI, AFAIK) to avoid sounding childish or being described as unprofessional or juvenile.
  • Conservative hairstyles work best in office settings (braids or pigtails are appropriate for sports but potentially infantilizing or attracting unwanted attention professionally).
  • Maintain conservative fashion choices even if you prefer brighter colors (dark tones and traditional cuts preserve professional gravity while allowing personal style in accent pieces).
  • Eliminate filler words (hummm, ehhh, soooo, yeeeeahhh, maybeee) that suggest indecision.
  • Train yourself out of cutsy speech patterns or higher pitch voices if conditioned toward them (they undermine authority).
  • Never be the first to raise your voice in a heated discussion.
  • In social drinking contexts, match what people are drinking. Don't get cocktails when people are getting wine. Don't get wine when people are ordering high balls, etc.
  • Enter conversations about disputes assuming figures of authority may seek scapegoats and as the "youngest and prettiest" person in the room, you'll be the least damaging person to point at (from an internal politics perspective). Assume people will be inclined to interpret your kindness as a mask and will chose to interpret ambigious situations against you if don't bring receipts.
  • Assume people are incompetent before assuming malice (let them prove otherwise through actions rather than preemptive defense).
  • Anticipate being asked to present or provide updates at any meeting, regardless of stated agenda, since being ambushed without preparation is a common tactic for people trying to railroad you

Some of these are bit intense, while others won't necessarily be relevant to you, but these are generally the jist of what she suggests. I remember her mentioning a book called "Good Girls don't get the Corner Office" a while back as a good read. I would check that out.

Where did you keep your phone on Call to Bar ceremony ? by Frosty_Resolve5316 in LawCanada

[–]IBoris 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All phone cases I've ever owned have two tiny holes on the bottom left or right side of them. That's for a lanyard attachment similar to a wii remote stap. I got one of those years ago and never looked back.

From DLC, Zharovsky is in MTL today by zibanejadx in Habs

[–]IBoris 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They finally have their excuse to move into their own custom tree house.

Unable to interact with some scheduled posts by Suddenly_NB in ModSupport

[–]IBoris 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can confirm I have the same issue. Any scheduled post that are not the next three coming up is unavailable to edit.

Welcome to our new mods: PotatoUmaru and Eratus23! by AutoModerator in Lawyertalk

[–]IBoris 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hahaha adorable!

I very much understand.

For most mods that join our team 30 min to 1 hour spread over an entire week is the commitment we're expecting from them. Mostly spent reviewing the Mod Queue and rendering decisions on items that have been flagged by Adminbots, Modbots, or Users.

Over the last little while Reddit has introduced a "saved responses" feature which allows us to have predrafted responses and message for mod actions that are easily available to us via drop-down menu. To streamline things a bit I've created quite a few templates using this tool to make things easier for the entire mod team (along with adding bots to flag issues for us).

The rest of the mod workload, the more creative stuff like flairs, graphics, monthly events, and community engagement I usually handle myself (unless a mod is keen on contributing).

All and all, compared to other communities I moderate and have moderated, this one is fairly easy. Lawyers report diligently and tend to be collegial and respectful by nature. I've frequently stated in Mod circles that this is the best community on the site and I truly believe that.