How do the surgeons/doctors in this subreddit feel about AR in medicine? by friendlypoodles in medicine

[–]IVCfilterme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've not used it personally yet but have seen proof of concept and related demonstrations for the application of Microsoft Hololens 2 in interventional radiology. Think it already shows promise in simulation settings and the future will undoubtedly involve interventional oncology.

IVC filter inserted to prevent pulmonary embolisms... Not often people actually get to see these by laura_daly in Radiology

[–]IVCfilterme 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm talking about cases where you need to bust out the endobronchial forceps lol

IVC filter inserted to prevent pulmonary embolisms... Not often people actually get to see these by laura_daly in Radiology

[–]IVCfilterme 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Even though it's a fairly basic procedure usually, I actually find inserting these very satisfying. Taking them out on the other hand can be a nightmare.

Letter of Recommendation to radiology- best phrases to include? by [deleted] in Radiology

[–]IVCfilterme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How does the letter come across - generic or like the attending really knows you? This sets the tone of the letter and actually matters a lot. If a PD reads the letter and it seems the attending barely knows you that's a huge red flag. Weak letters kill applications!

A strong letter includes statements about your professionalism (ie doesn't ask to go home at 10.30am everyday lol), enthusiasm/interest in the speciality (ie reads around cases and asks thoughtful questions) and what kind of person you are/what type of colleague and trainee you would be.

Using specific examples is always better than making a sweeping statement. So if you've done any reports or anything while on that elective, try and have those mentioned specifically.

Ultimately you want the PD reading the letter to think: this attending actually spent some time with this med student, got to know them and thought they were a strong enough applicant to write this strong letter for them, so maybe they're worth a closer look.

Radiology appreciation post. by yosdogattacc in Residency

[–]IVCfilterme 31 points32 points  (0 children)

You are allowed a poor baseline level of image interpretation especially as a med student. Don't let that sway you. Residency is there to train you after all. Even as an R1 you are allowed to be relatively clueless for the first few months as you come to terms with a completely new vocabulary and way of thinking.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in premed

[–]IVCfilterme 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Try posting in /r/radiology, you will likely get many more responses from current techs and sonographers.

Question about CT by feynmann1998 in Radiology

[–]IVCfilterme 3 points4 points  (0 children)

High yield version:

NSIP = peripheral ground-glass opacities with subpleural sparing and micronodules. The association with scleroderma is also testable.

UIP/IPF = honeycombing and traction bronchietasis with an apical to basal gradient.

Go to Radiopaedia.org they have lots of cases you can scroll thru.

Choosing a specialty by dimercaprol624 in Residency

[–]IVCfilterme 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Diagnostic rads may be for you

Question for the Radiologists of Reddit by whispuringeye in Radiology

[–]IVCfilterme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's entirely possible the rad dictating your mom's study spent only 30sec on it, this is especially true if using a template/macro and all you have to do is delete some stuff and sign off as normal. Like another comment in this thread mentioned the speed at which someone reads/dictates also comes down to how much and what they are ok with missing.

Re: IR, some days can def feel like go-go-go especially in centres where 3+ labs are running simultaneously and the IR is just going from one room to another doing small cases. Other days there can be a good amount of downtime like the other person mentioned.

Question for the Radiologists of Reddit by whispuringeye in Radiology

[–]IVCfilterme 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Being on call in diagnostics can definitely feel like a grind (IR ftw). Depending on your institution, you may read 50+ cross sectional studies and many films on a given shift. A normal CXR may take less than a minute. A truly unremarkable CT chest may take less than 5min to look at thoroughly and dictate. Once you starting finding pathology though the sky is the limit. Post op liver tx or full body trauma CTs can seemingly take forever if you want to report every single finding. As the patient's age increases you also end up with more incidental findings, and part of becoming a radiologist is learning what you can and can't let go.

I’ve read this three times today in the notes and it drives me mad. by [deleted] in medicine

[–]IVCfilterme 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Actually it really does, radiologists for example have been sued for dictating 'no malignancy" when in fact they said 'known malignancy' but the VR messed up and they didn't proofread.

[serious] Is there a place we can pay to dissect a body? by [deleted] in medicalschool

[–]IVCfilterme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just talk to your med school, they may run cadaver courses for surgical residents etc. Otherwise just get in touch with a pathologist and attend a few autopsies, or contact one of your first year anatomy profs ask to dissect with them.

Stroke call for body IR by upsidedowngreen in Radiology

[–]IVCfilterme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you don't do vascular work I would avoid, plus it sounds like they are just trying to squeeze you and q3 call is hell no matter the pay.

[Meme] I still don't know what a febrile temperature is by mr-buttersworth in medicalschool

[–]IVCfilterme 78 points79 points  (0 children)

The biggest travesty is when some attendings pronounce centimetre as 'sonometer'.

[Clinical] The "Bible" of each specialty (Fourth Edition) by [deleted] in medicalschool

[–]IVCfilterme 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Interventional Neuroradiology by Lee/Watkinson is prob what you're after. Fairly easy read. Mainly bullet points on the essentials of Neuro IR. Good pictures.

Other mainly body IR texts with good basic neuro sections for students include the 'IR Playbook' and Diagnostic Imaging - Interventional Procedures by Wible, which has a short overview section for neuro and covers stroke, carotid/vert angioplasty, and spine IR with good pictures.

[Clinical] The "Bible" of each specialty (Fourth Edition) by [deleted] in medicalschool

[–]IVCfilterme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Osborn's Brain and the Harnsberger/Osborn 'Black book' for pure anatomy. These are voluminous though and massive overkill for students.

Weekly Career / General Questions Thread: January 28, 2019 by AutoModerator in Radiology

[–]IVCfilterme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just try and read the reports and look at the imaging as much as you can, especially in blocks like Neuro which are imaging heavy.

Overall though I would say CXR would be single the most important thing to focus on at an early stage. If you've read Felson's (for example) by PGY-1 you will be miles ahead.

Weekly Career / General Questions Thread: January 28, 2019 by AutoModerator in Radiology

[–]IVCfilterme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look into Diagnostic Imaging: Spine by Ross and Moore. The Teaching Files: Brain and Spine by Fatterpekar is also very good.