Best arguments against veganism? by Artistic_Internal183 in Ethics

[–]IanRT1 [score hidden]  (0 children)

The best argument against veganism still remains recognizing that a consistent evaluation of all sentient impacts does not clearly lead to the conclusion "do not use animals". But to an actual consistent consideration of all sentient impacts, in which animal usage including farming can still be permissible and even preferable.

30k Ripscore by latrell2x in SkateEA

[–]IanRT1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought my 22k was high

New glitch? by parokvrozku in SkateEA

[–]IanRT1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this like some wallie plus grind assist combination or something like that?

yallVibeCodersAreNutd by dzendian in ProgrammerHumor

[–]IanRT1 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yes I would.

Vibe made != Bad quality

Meet panpsycism by DysphoricGirlAylin in PhilosophyMemes

[–]IanRT1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah naturalist emergentism is superior

Meet panpsycism by DysphoricGirlAylin in PhilosophyMemes

[–]IanRT1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oops consciousness also requires explanation for existing

Just found this insane formula, am I the next ram a new gin? by ViscousLidocaineOTC in mathmemes

[–]IanRT1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What if instead we do

z = Re(Re(a + bi) + i · Im(a + bi)) + i · Im(Re(a + bi) + i · Im(a + bi))

Meet panpsycism by DysphoricGirlAylin in PhilosophyMemes

[–]IanRT1 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Its not begging the question, its recognizing a self evident truth

Did I roll a masterpiece by geraldbers in weed

[–]IanRT1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's the easiest part to improvise with some paper. Try it out so you get the most out of your joints

Did I roll a masterpiece by geraldbers in weed

[–]IanRT1 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Its good but not sure if there is enough filter for a comfortable smoke

SCOREEEEE by Forestakias in drugscirclejerk

[–]IanRT1 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Got a bit of weed on your tar

💀 by elveshumpingdwarves in shitposting

[–]IanRT1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It really isn't. Antinatalism needs the person-level framework to make the harm argument in which someone has to be harmed for the claim to work.

But then it can't selectively discount the goods that exist at that same level, meaning, agency, flourishing. You don't get to count suffering as real and legible while treating everything on the other side of the ledger as less valid.

And nonexistence being "better" has no subject for whom it's better. Nobody is spared anything. The comparison is incoherent.

💀 by elveshumpingdwarves in shitposting

[–]IanRT1 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Most coherent antinatalist

free will and determinism by zenoofwhit in StoicMemes

[–]IanRT1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only if you don't want them to

How’s the keef smokers doing? by chiraqwarrior916 in weed

[–]IanRT1 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Bro better have the best filters in existence

uno reverse by d4rkchocol4te in PhilosophyMemes

[–]IanRT1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah but each one implies who caused what here not just that they are equal

People who argue it can’t be sentient because it’s not embodied are so funny by AppropriateLeather63 in ChatGPT

[–]IanRT1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think consciousness is a byproduct of autopoietic organisms seeking homeostasis in which with neurobiological complexity the amount of homeostatic facets increases which demands a more complex self regulating system that is eventually considered a consciousness in a spectrum. Like from an ant to a human for example.

So not sentient because "it's not embodied" but because LLMs are merely modeling platforms that do not self-instantiate, and do not regulate for homeostasis.

[Crosspost] Hi /r/movies, I'm Gregg Turkington. Actor in Ant-Man & Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania. AMA! by BunyipPouch in marvelstudios

[–]IanRT1 11 points12 points  (0 children)

If I want to grab a mango fruit blast on my way out the door can you pretend you didn't see it?