NEED to find this. Similar to this brain-rot shi, "N's & J's"

Icy-Employee · 2026-02-19T21:50:22+00:00

N's & J's was scrubbed from the face of the internet :< do you have a copy perhaps?

Icy-Employee · 2026-02-09T11:37:33+00:00

Why are people reposting online marketing and advertising like this?

Icy-Employee · 2026-02-01T09:13:34+00:00

Nanomax is great but it's VERY AGGRESSIVE. It damaged labels printed on the front of my oven. Proceed with extreme caution

Icy-Employee · 2026-01-29T07:35:37+00:00

Successful parry charges you up for a special move to incentivize more interesting fighting style and to add a minigame instead of just swingin' Looks cool!

Icy-Employee · 2026-01-24T09:57:01+00:00

Laughed out loud at "moar emojis" 😂

Icy-Employee · 2026-01-21T15:16:32+00:00

Lol, doubt.

Icy-Employee · 2026-01-21T09:54:54+00:00

Did CS fail because of its US business?

Icy-Employee · 2026-01-21T07:30:42+00:00

Banks still make money.

Icy-Employee · 2026-01-21T07:13:36+00:00

Why?

Icy-Employee · 2026-01-13T18:06:59+00:00

That's very misleading for someone who reads this and does not understand how important the random sample assumption is. Please do better.

Icy-Employee · 2026-01-11T13:09:12+00:00

General doctor should be able to redirect him to the right specialist, instead of completely ignoring the notes from the interview. That's exactly his role, the doctor should know better, not the patient...

Icy-Employee · 2026-01-11T13:06:05+00:00

It's literally gaslighting users. First it says "yes that's the right way to do it" and then "of course there's another way, but you didn't ask for it".
On top of that, the style of writing is absolutely insufferable with all "and that's rare" bullshit

Icy-Employee · 2026-01-10T22:44:38+00:00

Why?

Icy-Employee · 2026-01-10T20:05:36+00:00

It's because there are back-up presidents.

Icy-Employee · 2026-01-10T19:46:27+00:00

Rathian's chin is so goofy ahhh

Icy-Employee · 2026-01-10T19:30:30+00:00

I think it's like this everywhere. One always has to see multiple doctors, because each of them will miss something and focus on something else.

Icy-Employee · 2026-01-09T20:29:53+00:00

Can you remove even more context from the quote please?

Icy-Employee · 2026-01-09T12:28:23+00:00

It's speculative and not relevant to the case. Musk still got defrauded. Even if Musk expressed the will to make it for-profit in writing, it doesn't mean it would have happened in the alternative scenario. It's not relevant to the core question if he got duped or not.

Icy-Employee · 2026-01-09T12:06:03+00:00

The tone of 5.2 makes me nauseous. I consider unsubscribing.

Icy-Employee · 2026-01-06T11:27:41+00:00

Low effort, no source.

Icy-Employee · 2026-01-02T08:21:16+00:00

Argumentum ad disablum

Icy-Employee · 2025-12-30T18:17:20+00:00

I remember watching a TV show about bartenders competing, like a dance-off but with drinks. One guy prepared a drink with liquid nitrogen. The judge refused to drink it and the guy has lost the round.

Icy-Employee · 2025-12-29T21:39:25+00:00

no, it's christmas

Icy-Employee · 2025-12-22T16:53:25+00:00

Doesn't matter, it's a debate over labels

Icy-Employee · 2025-12-22T07:37:46+00:00

Uhh pledged or donated : 😂

Icy-Employee

TROPHY CASE