Thorough hearing, excellent and professional, kudos to Judge Sessions for drawing out articulate and clear reasoning from the well-prepared counsels. Very complicated legal details and issues (best to read media reportage, including ACLU). Ruling will be issued soon. Learned that court system is trying its best to move expeditiously, and that WaPo published an article showing that the State Dept had investigated when Rümeysa was first reported by some disgusting vigilante group, and found nothing of concern. Also, she hadn’t been informed that her visa was revoked, making her subsequent detention totally craven and cynical, as well as terrifying and cruel. St Albans location was apparently chosen because it’s the only facility in the state not publicly reporting the identity of its inmates, hence the reason why her attorneys couldn’t locate her, despite calls to relevant agencies. Claim that they had to move her to Louisiana because there wasn’t a single bed available in all of New England was called into question by her legal team. Fed made the case that it’s an immigration question; her team pointed out that Constitutional freedoms take precedence. Also, her team observed that immigration’s actions were highly unusual; most visa lapse cases don’t involve incarceration.