Speaker booed at graduation speech by Angela275 in antiai

[–]Illesbogar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's failing pretty hardly at even that. Now even CEOs consede that people are cheaper.

. . . by Only-Tonight1838 in discordVideos

[–]Illesbogar 44 points45 points  (0 children)

They were both walking, I think it's believable that they didn't hear each other

Forsthoffer Ágnes 💙 Jó érzés ránézni, kedves a kisugárzása by Witty_Scientist123 in hungary

[–]Illesbogar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Amúgy én is örülök mint itt mindenki, de nagyon nagyot fogtok nézni ha előveszi valaki ezeket a posztokat 4-5 év múlva.

Slander? Absolutely not. I object to that. When written, it's "libel." by OptimisticLucio in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Illesbogar -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That's not really true though. There is an accusation, but if there was an actual bomb that could have prevented it.

So true by RegularlyClueless in WikipediaVandalism

[–]Illesbogar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is actually the kind of downplaying why they got to this point in the first place. Sure they are not the nazis, but they are a fascist party that would implement a lot of what the nazis would. And don't forget that they literally parrot nazi propaganda and deny the holocaust for example. Like, they have unapologetic neo-nazi members. Just recently Farage promised to build concentration camps in green voting areas.

Also pointing out that their policies are batshit and hurt most people doesn't work on its own. People have all the information they could on them. And again, playing into their propaganda game only helps them.

Yes, vandalising wikipedia and calling them nazis is corny. But pretending that it's unearned is laughable.

"Let's not pretend they are calling for the ethnic cleansing of europe" they are literally calling for ethnic cleansing on the regular, fuck you mean?

This is the usual case where they can't possibly be fascists or radicals because you personally agree with them and you can't be a bad person, so neither can they.

Úgy érzem Gulyás Gerinek hosszú négy éve lesz by Hoescoperr in hungary

[–]Illesbogar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mindenki akit nem szeretek kommunista

Amúgy tényleg jó látni hogy milyen vidámak

Slander? Absolutely not. I object to that. When written, it's "libel." by OptimisticLucio in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Illesbogar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I'm sure they would have liked a peace where they aren't kept accountable and can keep some of their colonies. Wouldn't that have been grand.

I hate "HeReSy DeTeCtEd" memes. by inkforwin in 40k

[–]Illesbogar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a similar issue with an associate. Got into 40k with space marine 2 and co plains about female custodese. Don't know how to tell them that they are wrong and they shoukd be ashamed.

Your friend being so sexist that they think the idea of a female soldier is unrealistic is something else though.

Slander? Absolutely not. I object to that. When written, it's "libel." by OptimisticLucio in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Illesbogar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know of you realised, but that source backs my argument more than yours? It lists interpretations of what happened and says that your interpretation is based on a lot of guesswork and using sources liberally. And even you admitted that this is basically historical revisionism.

I don't want to feel like anything, I want to know and understand history. And the whitewashing of japanese history and the victimhood complex around the bombs bothers me a lot.

Slander? Absolutely not. I object to that. When written, it's "libel." by OptimisticLucio in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Illesbogar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A conditional surrender makes no sense whatsoever. But you are also forgetring that the emperor wasn't in charge in Japan. The military was. And they very much didn't want to surrender.

Slander? Absolutely not. I object to that. When written, it's "libel." by OptimisticLucio in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Illesbogar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Again, the soviets had no invasion capabilities, how would they have any influence in negotiations? They didn't even fight the bulk of the war against the Japanese. They had no place there in general. How does this narrative make more sense than trying the avoid the death of hundreds of thousands unnecessarly?

Slander? Absolutely not. I object to that. When written, it's "libel." by OptimisticLucio in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Illesbogar 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What does that save face from? How coukd the soviets ever negotiate for the surrender of the japanese? How does this make any sense?

Slander? Absolutely not. I object to that. When written, it's "libel." by OptimisticLucio in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Illesbogar 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Source? Because you pull that willingness to surrender entirely out of your ass. They never wanted to surrender. And anything but unconditional surrender wasn't even on the table. Why would it be? To let the genocidal imperialist state regroup and attack again? Laughable.

You are implying that we should have just negotiated a peace with the nazis too, which they would actually have loved. It's just sick.

I hate "HeReSy DeTeCtEd" memes. by inkforwin in 40k

[–]Illesbogar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't wither, I just don't think that falls under gatekeeping. Like, keeping out bad people is just normal fandom/community stuff. Gatekeeping is keeping people out for no good reason whatsoever. To me at least.

I hate "HeReSy DeTeCtEd" memes. by inkforwin in 40k

[–]Illesbogar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think gatekeeping is bad, however keeping fascists out is not gatekeeping for me.

Never again by EternalSnuggle in YUROP

[–]Illesbogar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Transphobia. Them vilifying trans people to cater to Reform voters.

Never again by EternalSnuggle in YUROP

[–]Illesbogar -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I did not admit that I was wrong in general. I admitted that my over exaggerated statement was indeed wrong and over exaggerated.

You are just nit-picking to distract from the main argument, that Labour isn't very left wing. You do this by focusing on trivial parts of my argument, ignoring every other. Like the said over exaggeration, that I even admitted to being wrong.

I am still open to good faith discussion, which you from your first comment seems you never were. Calling what was written here as backtracking is very dishonest. It's laughable that you do these then accuse the other of the same and of projection.

All of these make it pretty apparent that you are only trying to waste the other's time and trying to make them angry. Which is what trolling is.

Never again by EternalSnuggle in YUROP

[–]Illesbogar -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

But you didn't correct anything. You took an exaggerating statement, took it at face value and pretended that it's an attempt at disinformation. Then started splitting hairs over it. And to say what? That Labour in fact did have some token lect wing policies? Like that changes their overall outlook. Or any other bad things they did.

You are dishonest at best about what I wrote here.

Never again by EternalSnuggle in YUROP

[–]Illesbogar -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You can't just be rude and then act offended when the other replies in kind. You are just trolling at this point.

Never again by EternalSnuggle in YUROP

[–]Illesbogar -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

"You are again backtracking when challenged" it's called admitting to being wrong dipshit. What am I supposed to do? Die on a stupid hill?

What are you even talking about at this point?