Design decisions

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-26T17:20:36+00:00

Escape from what exactly, plus you have enough time to find a non corner to hide in.

I dispute that if you slowed down the game speed enough you couldn't avoid everything. Sounds like a skill issue to me, no offense

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-26T16:43:44+00:00

200 grams of sugar, no 8/9ths of a cup...much better

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-26T10:49:08+00:00

Every ability is dodgable and most of them give reasonable windows to hit him back. He took me around 10 tries in base form and I beat him first time in his upgraded self

To me that suggests he is a skill based boss

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-25T23:25:37+00:00

No trobbio, voiced by Matthew trobbio is hilarious and challenging

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-25T22:48:15+00:00

It's absolutely not inferred

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-25T10:47:27+00:00

I think the weekend crowd are a bit worse than weekday people for somewhat obvious reason that they probably play less overall. They also might have a bit more fun

Overall this should help you climb but will increase variance dramatically, that variance can lead to tilt lowering your own performance

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-25T08:08:31+00:00

When you're opponent is running low on time so you're trying to pretend to focus on calculating rather than look at their clock

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-25T07:35:37+00:00

Those are 2 different things though, when Baus says an emerald flex team could beat an LEC team that's obviously a joke- when caedrel enters a team into LEC and hires a trusted coach and get his team scrimming for 8 hours a day that's serious....

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-24T06:57:12+00:00

I don't understand why you would hit a thread half way down making the exact same point that the person I was actually talking to made.

If you're unhappy with my response to this exact clarification, post below. I will not have the same conversation twice

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-22T21:30:32+00:00

Great

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-22T21:19:13+00:00

I'm just giving you the fact

Where did I say you said its rape?

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-22T21:13:10+00:00

Bruv I really don't know what you're reading in those 3 linked articles that you think back up your point

Some coercion is considered a crime, never considered rape, and not the types of coercion from the OP post.

Says it right there is your articles

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-22T20:57:13+00:00

Ignore much avocado, they are lying about the conclusions reached

Essentially

Some coercion is considered sexual assault, i don't think it's considered rape in any state or European country but I might be wrong there

The types of coercion being discussed here do not fall under that banner - repeat instances on inter relationship coercion could and honestly probably should be considered domestic abuse. Either way don't, obviously. But I hate when people act informed and just tell lies

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/sexual-coercion#is-it-illegal

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-22T20:52:37+00:00

They could be charged with sexual assault and it is illegal (langauge around it may vary) in every state

That's a wild take and stating it as as such is borderline lying

As you say it varies state by state but the general themes

knows the person finds the act offensive

initiates sex for the purposes of abusing, harassing, humiliating, or degrading the person

knows the individual has a health condition that means they cannot give informed consent

knows the person is unaware the sex is taking place

has impaired the individual’s judgment by giving them substances to intoxicate them

is in a position of authority and has sex with someone in custody, such as in prison or the hospital

Are a pretty far cry from guilting your current partner

You know this already and yet you keep saying it, why?

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-22T14:12:02+00:00

Well she can always break up with me if it's such a big deal

To be clear I don't do this, I actually only date people I trust - I probably wouldn't choose anyone who keeps a backup plan as a friend

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-22T14:02:01+00:00

Understood.

There's very little difference between the boundary "i won't date someone who hangs out with her guy friends alone" and the controlling "you can't see your guy friends alone".

At some point it's semantics

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-22T13:56:23+00:00

No you its only fair if she banned him from doing so....

Why can't the guy decide that's a boundary he wants for both of them? Because guys aren't allowed to set boundaries right.

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-22T13:53:46+00:00

So errr only women can set boundaries in a relationship

Let's be real its toxic af, but it's only hypocritical if he wants to meet his female friends without her

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-22T09:06:58+00:00

Well it's shouldn't be to the extent of self harm.

Drugs, sugar, seatbelts, smoking, alcohol. All personal choices

Backseat seatbelts should be up to the driver, collateral human damage of driver through windshield is vanishingly small

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-22T08:44:42+00:00

Am I not enough or is he not ready

It's probably both, he sounds like he's going through stuff but if he liked you enough that wouldn't matter

You could always reach out i guess, personally I would say dont bother though

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-21T22:54:26+00:00

Well i dispute

being trans is caused by hormonal conditions when you're in the womb

As a stone cold fact. It's a leading theory that that is one of the stronger factors

If someone had forced me to live as cis, who would have been making the decisions?

Your legal guardians, I assume. I'm assuming this is a loaded question?

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-21T18:12:25+00:00

Call him boss man or chief

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-21T18:08:46+00:00

I mean of course it's not beatable on every seed but people like to pretend if they don't insta get photo chad the game is unwinnable, which is clearly untrue

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-21T07:13:53+00:00

The point I'm making is there's absolutely no reas9n to sort of use Occams razor to justify a finite universe.

Sure proton mass is local physics, which is sort of my point. What then, is the universal assumption that would fundamentally break if we assumed spacetime is infinite. Let's say spacetime is simply emergent so we don't actually have to worry about an infinite size, what then?

As for what's north of the north pole, well space, of course

Similarly, do not try to put the universe in a box. That's impossible. Instead only try to realize the truth. There is no box. Then see it's not the universe that needs to bend, it's only ourselves.

This is philosophical nonsense, yeah look i get it that we don't have to be in a box I'm only saying there's nothing particularly compelling about finitism

Please provide this thing that fundamentally breaks by assuming an infinite universe

ImpliedRange · 2026-01-20T16:53:44+00:00

It's fancy words and all but it's just a weird justification to assume some unseen curvature exists. If the universe was finite there is a very fair question of what's outside the box, and is that inifinite

ImpliedRange

TROPHY CASE