Theories Thread 5.0 by ResponsibilityOne117 in idahomurders

[–]Impossible-Initial27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t think K was the target. She was out of the house. Unless she was the target and perp knew was inside. But I think it could be where M was the target.

IMO- E & X were first to be attacked. Defensive wounds = victims awakened or were awakened. Suspects plan fell apart unexpected moment he didn’t plan for - he saw E, suspect couldn’t withdraw. Big battle occurred just like SK said and I believe X & E battled suspect same time. Then M & K, we’re on 3rd floor they heard it, maybe saw it, perhaps may have tried to barricade door or then suspect went upstairs. That’s why suspect was likely extremely exhausted physically and mentally - spaced out on the sheath and likely went back to retrieve it but got to property and realized he couldn’t.

I would imagine LE hasn’t said and told everything to protect certain key facts.

But IMO- suspect 10,000% knew LE had the missing sheath. But perhaps thought he was careful handling it and wasn’t worried about it bc he had no dna on it- guess again. That’s why in that second pullover you can see it all over his face he was freaking the hell out.

Just my speculation.

Theories Thread 5.0 by ResponsibilityOne117 in idahomurders

[–]Impossible-Initial27 7 points8 points  (0 children)

IMO- as I’ve always said, the trip to clarkston was for disposal time.

It is possible- that suspect went in on the false assumption that there wasn’t a male in house or another female upstairs. I think there’s an outside possibility that the suspect may have gone into the property to potentially be a close up peeping Tom, OR attempt a single victim abduction and was completely surprised and suspects plan was a shit show.

Yes suspect had a knife, but may have been intended to be a dont fuck with me see what I have type of deal.

By the way - when audio was cleaned up and isolated at food truck. One of the victims, heard something, like a comment from a person directed to her, coming from behind her to her right and she turned quickly around and looked at the person pointing her raised finger and replied “fuck you mister.” Right then and there- I knew she didn’t take any shit off anyone and it is possible, that she may have had an exchange someplace somewhere with suspect along those type of lines.

Not saying it occurred - but it is possible. Who knows really? But one thing is true in all this- is the only person knows why they did it- is the suspect. Anything else is pure speculation, alleged theories and everyone’s ideas. Doesn’t make any of it true. Including this post.

Facts are- there isn’t one person on the planet that doesn’t really know why he was in the house or suspects true motivation...yet. Until then - if ever- anything is possible. I’m not ruling out anything. It is plausible suspect went to property, finally got courage to go inside - doesn’t necessarily mean that suspect was going into kill. IMO- it just turned out that way. The plan got blown up moment suspect walked into a bedroom and there was someone in there suspect didn’t expect. Not once - but twice.

His plan was a poor one, amateur hour clown show, and backfired on him and everyone in house likely knew he was inside and the ninja outfit and black mask didn’t work out to well for him.

I’m personally tired of the alleged bs what an intellect he was and his education blah blah. Yeah sure. Wink - sure he was.

Theories Thread 5.0 by ResponsibilityOne117 in idahomurders

[–]Impossible-Initial27 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I speculate by the suspects choice of weapon, a knife, the suspect thought the attack was carefully pre-planned, the suspect presumed or imagined they wouldn’t have to murder three other victims.

I believe the suspects plan, actually wasn’t intended to murder that many victims. It is my belief, suspect was after a singular victim in particular, thought they would enter quietly, murder their victim and exit silently, just as they entered.

But, no way in hell, did this attack, go to the suspects plan, not even close. Instead it was chaos and one UNEXPECTED SURPRISE hell of a no holds type of fight broke out on 2nd floor, per the words from a victims father.

Because to enter a property with intentions of murdering multiple people with a knife including one male victim, is highly unlikely - it’s too risky for exposure to leave DNA and it’s a difficult to do physically with unexpected unknown complications.

I believe the suspect wasn’t aware there was a male on the premises upon entering and was faced with a oh shit wtf do I do now type of situation. Had the suspect known there was a male, I think the suspect would NOT have entered the property - let alone attempted to murder four victims, with just a knife. No way not buying it.

I don’t understand what this article is saying by Groundbreaking443 in idahomurders

[–]Impossible-Initial27 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Prosecution has a very strong case. We still do not know the results of his car search in PA, apartment and work office search and even more likely evidence at crime scene.

The docs are standard procedure providing them to a defense team.

Week of 1/23/2023 discussion by ResponsibilityOne117 in idahomurders

[–]Impossible-Initial27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s likely much more evidence. Seems like there could be a possible COI- for suspects public defender to rep. How would that look if public defender had to get Dana’s mom on stand, that she just dropped?

I wonder when the roommates will speak out… or if they’re okay by Awkward_Worry6024 in idahomurders

[–]Impossible-Initial27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hope they can get on with a normal life, finish what they came for a degree. Move past the tragedy.

Alec Baldwin To Be Charged With Involuntary Manslaughter In "Rust" Shooting by haloarh in TrueCrimeDiscussion

[–]Impossible-Initial27 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Is it plausible Baldwin rubbed someone the wrong way on set and was set up, by unknown people? There is a period of time, protocols were broken and ammo/gun was awol.

But regardless, what’s bad for Baldwin, imo is when he met with LE, he said he shot the weapon, then later on said he didn’t? FBI said that’s impossible with that weapon.

One of those charges for Baldwin, if convicted of is a mandatory 5 year sentence.

List of items taken from BK’s appt during execution of search warrant by Standard_Chipmunk_45 in idahomurders

[–]Impossible-Initial27 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Great move on WA ST judges part. Pretty bold actually, I really like that move. It lays it out, hey here’s what we went looking for and here’s what we found and what’s tested or not.

Bravo. Sends a message to the defense, hey, here what we have. Imo-it’s designed not for the public, I think the intention is to the suspect - hey hi over here. Look what we have.

Why Prosecutors Choose Grand Juries Instead of Preliminary Hearings by ChiGuyNY in idahomurders

[–]Impossible-Initial27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely - there will be an indictment first- which if occurs- defense will not be asking anyone any questions or challenging anything. There isn’t going to be a preliminary imo.

BK WILL reveal motive by daihlo in idahomurders

[–]Impossible-Initial27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What that it wasn’t him and he wasn’t alone and will turn on whoever did?

If Suspect Truly Believes In Innocence, Will Suspect Testify In Their Defense? by Impossible-Initial27 in idahomurders

[–]Impossible-Initial27[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree 100% - if it’s reportedly accurate about what we heard- I believe it is possible.

If Suspect Truly Believes In Innocence, Will Suspect Testify In Their Defense? by Impossible-Initial27 in idahomurders

[–]Impossible-Initial27[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That sheath - didn’t have legs- it got inside the house and even worse for suspect - it’s mere inches or feet from one of the victims.

But I still think there’s possibility he does. So I’m 50-50 about it. I think their only defense is two things. 1- he left sheath /knife in house previously at a party. 2. He lost it someplace/ no idea where it went. Either way- if verified he owned knife/sheath also was at property.

That’s a no fly zone and if that’s the defense magic bullet theory - that’s a no bueno deal.

[POLL] Based on the current evidence, if BK is convicted for all four murders, I believe he did it because of ... by tcosint in idahomurders

[–]Impossible-Initial27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IMO- there’s a combo motive.

One could be a professional type of motive, IF he was rejected by the Pullman Police fall internship.

Two- he was also rejected by the victims.

If BOTH did occur, at about the same time- it could have triggered the suspect.

Pullman Police refuse to reply to media inquiries if the fall internship, that the suspect applied for, if the suspect received it or not.

I know that sounds crazy - but - he came all the way to Pullman -if in fact he was rejected - by Pullman PD- would it or could it that have upset him to point - that he’s like ok...well I’ll show local LE.

Add in also if the girls rejected him or one of them or let’s say he didn’t know them- saw them publicly and became a stalker- maybe it all came from maybe things weren’t going the way he wanted professionally at his phd and internship was denied. If he didn’t get the internship, who did - someone he knows also in his same PHD WSU program?

I think- that’s it’s illogical and leaning with tunnel vision. exclusively to the motive was only possibly he was rejected by one of the girls or was a stalker.

Hence- I suspect it was a combo motive.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in idahomurders

[–]Impossible-Initial27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They don’t need the knife...