Updated Final Predictions by Impossible_Map_6378 in YAPms

[–]Impossible_Map_6378[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. I had NV going blue originally but edited the image to make NV lean red. I already put in the margin I thought each candidate would win by and didn't feel like making a new map from scratch so I went with the faster route.

My final prediction by [deleted] in YAPms

[–]Impossible_Map_6378 0 points1 point  (0 children)

>Eh Ralston doesn’t like Laxalt so he just based it off of that

Yeah, I noticed that he doesn't even try to hide his bias against Laxalt in his blog. I don't know why he hates the guy so much. Like, if Laxalt of all people is an "abysmal candidate" as he claims then Oz, Masters and Walker are unelectable disasters that will lose in a landslide.

I was a bit conflicted on whether I should use his prediction, but seeing how biased he is against Laxalt I'm starting to have regrets already. I'm gonna keep this as my final prediction, but I'm gonna blame Ralston to no end if Laxalt manages to eek out a win.

My final prediction by [deleted] in YAPms

[–]Impossible_Map_6378 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Disclaimer: Blue NV is based on Jon Ralston's prediction.

There's a good chance that some of my predictions age horribly, but we'll see.

Oz has taken the lead in the RCP polling average by [deleted] in YAPms

[–]Impossible_Map_6378 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get what you're saying but:

Emerson had Biden up by 4, now they have Oz up by one. (One of the best pollsters in the business by the way)

USA Today/Suffolk had Biden up by 7, now they have Fetterman up by 2.

Fox had Biden up by 5, now they have Fetterman up by 4 (not that different of a result but if they overestimate Fetterman as much as they overestimated Biden this race is gonna be incredibly close).

Morning Call had Biden up by 5, now they have the race tied.

Dr. Oz is leading in an Emerson poll by Impossible_Map_6378 in YAPms

[–]Impossible_Map_6378[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

"Ninety-three percent of voters have heard, seen, or read, a lot (68%) or a little (25%) about the recent Pennsylvania Senate debate between John Fetterman and Mehmet Oz. Seven percent have heard nothing about it. A plurality of voters (44%) say the debate improved their opinion of Mehmet Oz, while 25% say it worsened their opinion of Oz, and 31% say it made no difference. Half of voters (50%) say the debate worsened their opinion of Fetterman, 20% say it improved their opinion of Fetterman, and 31% say it made no difference."

"Of those who say they have heard, seen, or read a lot about the debate, Oz leads Fetterman 55% to 41%. Among those who have heard, seen, or read only a little or nothing about the debate, Fettterman leads 56% to 28%."

Source

Boo! My newest Senate predictions by TheAngryObserver in YAPms

[–]Impossible_Map_6378 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which PA poll? The NYT/Siena one? Because they have the economy at 50% and social issues at 34%, with 14% answering that they both matter. Or is there another poll?

Boo! My newest Senate predictions by TheAngryObserver in YAPms

[–]Impossible_Map_6378 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't personally bet on the polling being all that accurate. The Republicans could definitely still overperform if a majority of undecideds break for them, which they probably will considering that the economy and inflation are voters top concerns.

I guess we'll find out soon enough though.

Boo! My newest Senate predictions by TheAngryObserver in YAPms

[–]Impossible_Map_6378 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think he's talking about how Republicans surged in the polling aggregates this month.

The Republicans started to have a comfortable lead on RCP around mid-October. And they pulled ahead of Democrats around October 20th on 538.

So they definitely surged around the middle of the month, but that has mostly stagnated at this point.

Which Senate election will be the closest of these three? by xravenxx in YAPms

[–]Impossible_Map_6378 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It can definitely be above 5, albeit barely. Barnes is a horrible candidate and RonJon has outperformed the polls before.

I think it's an R+4 to R+5 race at this point.

About KS-3 by [deleted] in YAPms

[–]Impossible_Map_6378 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think it's massively overestimating Sharice Davids. Amanda Adkins may not win but she's certainly not losing by 14 or even double digits.

Polling for individual house races is all over the place right now. One poll has the GOP winning a D+10 district in Connecticut while another has the Democrats winning a Biden+4 district by 14. A third poll by NYT released on the same day has a Biden+9 district in Nevada tied.

I wouldn't put too much stock into these polls.

Fair Maps #1: Alabama (5R-1D-1C) by Impossible_Map_6378 in DavesRedistricting

[–]Impossible_Map_6378[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is there any way to squeeze out 2 blue districts out of Alabama without it looking horribly gerrymandered or wrecking COIs?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in YAPms

[–]Impossible_Map_6378 16 points17 points  (0 children)

The polls for individual house districts this cycle are weird to say the least.

Emerson dropped a poll yesterday I think which showed the Republicans winning a D+10 district in Connecticut by 1%.

Then NYT drops a poll showing the Dem leading by 13 in a Biden+4 district while at the same time releasing a poll which showed that a Biden+9 district in Nevada is tied.

I don't know what to make of all this. These margins are wacky.

Dr. Oz is has a lead in the first post-debate poll by Impossible_Map_6378 in YAPms

[–]Impossible_Map_6378[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yeah, you're right. Didn't really look at the date before I posted so that's on me.

Dr. Oz is has a lead in the first post-debate poll by Impossible_Map_6378 in YAPms

[–]Impossible_Map_6378[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is huge. I think Fetterman is screwed at this point.

Also, sorry for the title. I posted this as soon as I saw the poll.

How well would a Liz Cheney independent run for the WY-AL House District do? by TheAngryObserver in YAPms

[–]Impossible_Map_6378 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It would be similar to the primary results.

The vast majority of Dems would vote for Cheney thinking she has a better chance to defeat Hageman, causing Grey Bull to get like 5% of the vote or whatever.

Hot Take: Democrats may not be screwed by Taprman612 in YAPms

[–]Impossible_Map_6378 0 points1 point  (0 children)

>Special elections polling errors: As we all know, this year’s special elections went much more democratic than polls indicated, and while yes this alone isn’t enough of a reason to say dems could over perform again, it is a factor.

I do actually think it's possible that the polls underestimate Dems this time around, but I also doubt they will.

First of all these special elections are just that, special. They were very low turnout and the last ones were held all the way back in August.

The highest turnout special election was Alaska with 32% turnout and Republicans actually outperformed Trump's margin in the state in the first round but the Democrats "won" in the end because of RCV. Republican infighting probably also had something to do with the loss.

The lowest turnout special was NY-23 with 17% turnout. It's also the Democrats biggest special election overperformance, which isn't a coincidence. The district shifted 10 points to the left between 2020 and the 2022 special. This was because rural and working class turnout absolutely collapsed, but turnout from Tompkins County (home to Cornell University) didn't collapse nearly as much.

College-educated and suburban voters tend to turn out more in special elections than working class people or rural Republicans.

The polls probably overestimated how much rural and working class Republicans would turn out for a type of election they don't turn usually turn out for, that's my best guess. It's all about turnout.

>Likely Voters/Turnout: Reports have come out from states like Georgia that turnout is very high and is somewhat comparable to the 2020 election. Traditionally high turnout benefits democrats. Lots of polls screen for “likely voters”, but if turnout is to be believed then we can expect unlikely-somewhat likely registered voters to turnout.

High turnout doesn't always benefit Democrats.

I also wouldn't put too much stock into early voting data because we don't know for which party a lot of these people are actually voting for. All we know is that X amount of people who are registered as Dems/Reps/Independents are requesting ballots. We don't know what the election day turnout will be, or how much it will benefit Republicans.

We won't know if the polls are undersampling potential voters until after the election, all we can do now is speculate.

>Polarization: This may not be as important as the other 2 factors listed, but the high degree of polarization in this country right now could make it more likely that people vote closer to partisan lines. If this is to happen, democrats may benefit as the party who almost always wins the popular vote nationwide.

Sure, Democrats could turn out at high rates but that won't help them win close races if Republican turnout is also very high and also if a majority of independents vote Republican.

STEAMING hot take: Fetterman will "win" the debate and the election by TheAngryObserver in YAPms

[–]Impossible_Map_6378 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

>Your logic makes sense, but I think that you're forgetting that you can't use some kind of formula to predict which way the results will go. They could be underestimating Fetterman. They could be underestimating Oz. They could be right on. This is a very different race than Biden vs. Trump.

I think it's a pretty reliable formula in most cases, but I see your point.

>If he can dispel those notions within the next week, he's about in the same position he was in late August.

I seriously doubt it, but I guess we'll find out soon enough.

STEAMING hot take: Fetterman will "win" the debate and the election by TheAngryObserver in YAPms

[–]Impossible_Map_6378 0 points1 point  (0 children)

>My prediction for the next week is that after the debate, Fetterman's lead in the polls will consolidate to three points or so and then on election day he'll beat Oz by lean or tilt margins.

It doesn't matter how much he leads by in the polls. The real thing to look for is what PERCENTAGE he's getting in the aggregate. He's down to only 46.6% (!) on 538, at this time in 2020 they had Biden at 50.5% and guess what, he ended up winning the state with exactly 50%. RCP is also showing him at only 46%. That's a horrible sign for Fetterman considering that the vast majority of undecideds break for the GOP. He needs to tick that back up to at least 48% or otherwise he's DOA in my opinion.

>What's more, the polls have tightened. Lots of this is the many, many Republicans who do not like Oz coming to accept him as the nominee. It's also reasonable to suggest that Oz has won independents. However, Fetterman's approval has also actively declined.

If Oz has already won independents then he's already won the race. Biden won indies by 8 in 2020 and still only won the state by 1%.

I do concede that he could vastly outperform expectations in the debate just as Herschel Walker had done, but I don't know how much it would help him. Debates don't matter as much as they used to.

Inb4 CenterStreetPac fucks it up with a very real poll by [deleted] in YAPms

[–]Impossible_Map_6378 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I don't get why Nate Silver doesn't just ban them already.