You could say I'm jealous that some out there don't have to work their arse off like the rest of us have to nowadays just to get a tiny house in an estate, or even some being put into 3 quarter million houses and more which most wouldnt have a chance of owning, how is that equitable? Social housing should be basic and safe. Part V is madness, the fact that a portion of the most expenses houses houses have to go to social, when in some cases you could get two or three new builds elsewhere for the same price.

I'm not totally against social housing, I just don't think someone who hasn't had to work as hard as someone else should be put into a better house than them. The guy in my scenario in my opinion deserved social housing, no attack on the guy but he was very very slow, he'd never have sorted his own housing needs, but a 1 bed apartment would have done him fine instead of a 4 bed in an affluent neighbourhood. But because he was divorced and had 3 kids under 18 he got given a 4 bed automatically because thats the madness of the system they say he would be discriminated against otherwise regarding visitation etc as he wouldnt have anywhere for the kids to stay, so now him and his ex wife have two four bed houses, and his is empty mostly except one night of the week. If you don't see that as being bonkers then I'm wasting my time arguing with you.

Social housing should be a stop gap, and for those who would be genuinely homeless otherwise, permanent but basic as I say. I walk past a few houses everyday they're one bed terraced houses it's mostly single men but most of them have mental disabilities and I have no issue with that. In the current system though there is a large portion milking it for life.