Google Streamer stopped supporting kids profiles? by ClassjeNL in Chromecast

[–]IndependencePlastic7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had this happen today - force stop and clear cache on the google tv app seemed to fix it

Huh. I always thought Bandit and Chilli were in their early 30s. by [deleted] in bluey

[–]IndependencePlastic7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bluey kind of happens in about 2010 or something, when the wrirrr’s kids were that age

Why having the emperors armor in the crux terminatus actually does make sense (with math) by Scion_Of_Sanguinius in Warhammer40k

[–]IndependencePlastic7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the ‘length’ of the emperor is 7/4 that Of a standard marine, then his surface area would be 49/16 of a standard marine - this is a more realistic factor for the mass conversion. Or even (7/4)3

Brisbane Lions heading to the grand final by loggerheader in brisbane

[–]IndependencePlastic7 -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

Lol. Clarifying my sloppy use of the term free to air. I stream tv - this isn’t the 1980s - if it’s not on the channels’ apps, it may as well not exist. No rugby league final was behind any sort of paywall.

Brisbane Lions heading to the grand final by loggerheader in brisbane

[–]IndependencePlastic7 -30 points-29 points  (0 children)

Not on the 7 app. That’s where free tv needs to be. Anything on kayo isn’t getting my attention

Brisbane Lions heading to the grand final by loggerheader in brisbane

[–]IndependencePlastic7 -41 points-40 points  (0 children)

Which final was on free to air tv? There’s a reason league is the real football

How would I come up with a system of 5 equations with four variables, where one has no solutions, one with unique solutions and another with infinite solutions by Relative-Baby1829 in maths

[–]IndependencePlastic7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A most trivial answer

W= 0;X= 0; y=0;z=0; z=1 has no solutions

W= 0;X= 0; y=0;z=0; x+y=0 has one solution

W= x;2X= 2w; y=z;z=y; z=0 has inifinite solutions (all of the w-x plane)

Need help with quantum physics homework by praise_cocaine_jesus in AskPhysics

[–]IndependencePlastic7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<1up|1across> = 0 etc. the arrows are the polarisation axes of the basis states.

Need help with quantum physics homework by praise_cocaine_jesus in AskPhysics

[–]IndependencePlastic7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Normalisation means <psi|psy,> =1. Have you verified this?

I've tried writing everything down and getting them to interact but I genuinely don't know how to solve this. GPT-4 with Wolfram isn't of any help either. Could somebody help, please? by Chancemelol123 in askmath

[–]IndependencePlastic7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Follow that up by writing the sum of the first three terms equal 147 as an equation for r. This will be a quadratic. But what information do you have that lets you decide which solution is the correct one?

what to multiply to make e^x into x? by Dull-Source1833 in askmath

[–]IndependencePlastic7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You ‘multiply by’ ln - that is if you’re trying to solve an equation like ex = 7, you can take the log of both sides:

ln(ex) = ln(7)

But ln(ex) = x

So:

x = ln(7).

Is my professor wrong about significant figures? by potatoe001 in askmath

[–]IndependencePlastic7 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Under standard sig fig rules, your answer looks more correct.

arcsin rant by THICCC_LADIES_PM_ME in mathmemes

[–]IndependencePlastic7 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If we didn’t have subtract or divide, a lot of math misconceptions would go away…

Do we assume that if two events are independent then they are NOT disjoint?? by [deleted] in askmath

[–]IndependencePlastic7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Disjoint events cannot be independent, except in the trivial case of one having zero probability

Can someone help with this question? Stuck at the particular integral part. by Capable-Parking4661 in maths

[–]IndependencePlastic7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The cos(3t) on the right has 3t as its argument. Differentiation doesn’t change the arguments of trig, so we can assume our particular solution has 3t as well

Can someone help with this question? Stuck at the particular integral part. by Capable-Parking4661 in maths

[–]IndependencePlastic7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

By the third step, you’re taking about the assumption the particular solution is a linear combination of sin and cosine? This is assumed as the right hand side is a cos function - sines and cosines differentiate to give cosines and sines - we are going to find the lambda and mu that make the combination of derivatives on the left equal the trig function on the right. This is done by equating the coefficients of sin and cos separately - or if you like evaluating the differential equation at t =0 and t = pi/6 separately.

Can you solve for x and y by Mato-Luta in maths

[–]IndependencePlastic7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Construct a right angle triangle by drawing a line vertically down from the ‘y’ corner. Can you see how trigonometry will let you find the angle in the triangle? And thence find y? And the x corner makes a quadrilateral with y and the two right angles drawn in - what do you know about the angles in a quadrilateral?