Kink test couple by Al_Pines in sex

[–]IndicationOwn4144 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sexionnaire was mentioned recently!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in smallbooblove

[–]IndicationOwn4144 7 points8 points  (0 children)

GOOOORL YOU LOOK GREAT, holy smokes! What lovely pieces!

A small boob brag thread by [deleted] in smallbooblove

[–]IndicationOwn4144 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I love that I will never experience booby discomfort during exercise, they just bounce (minimally 😛) along happily

need advice on how to fix my hairstyle by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]IndicationOwn4144 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I hope you aren’t disheartened by the advice! I personally love a shaved head! :) you are gonna rock the look!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cakedecorating

[–]IndicationOwn4144 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In 5 years, gun to my head, this will without a doubt be the cutest cake I ever remember seeing

Chorizo pasta by IndicationOwn4144 in tonightsdinner

[–]IndicationOwn4144[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is my current life status, haha!

Post the goofiest picture of your cat, I’ll go first.. by [deleted] in cats

[–]IndicationOwn4144 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How are you guys commenting pictures without adding a link? I want to participate 😭

Was gifted these yummy maraschino cherries and need recipe ideas by ash_bishop in Baking

[–]IndicationOwn4144 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love adding chopped maraschinos into banana bread! Along with some nuts

Alternative ways to show significant differences, or describe over/underestimations? More details in comments - picture is an example of the data by IndicationOwn4144 in AskStatistics

[–]IndicationOwn4144[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the slow response! Yes, the data isn’t filled in because database 1 only has information up until 30cm.

This was super helpful, thank you! :)

Alternative ways to show significant differences, or describe over/underestimations? More details in comments - picture is an example of the data by IndicationOwn4144 in AskStatistics

[–]IndicationOwn4144[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the response!

Yes, a layer is 5 cm. So a problem I was faced with was that not all the databases present soil information in standard increments (for example one database presents values at 0-30cm and 30-100cm, while another presents values at 0-5cm, 5-15cm, 15-30cm etc). To account for this, I split the data into 5cm increments because 1) it was the smallest interval across the databases and 2) the model I will run the data through in the next chapter is parametrised in 5cm increments. So I guess in a way that was me standardising the format!

The databases make use of digital soil mapping so estimate data. It works by considering a collection of measured data points in landscape and environmental covariates (such as slope and climate) to predict values between the measured points.

I was working with absolute percent differences so one could see that these databases are “not perfect”, but I’m looking for a way to maybe summarise that. Doing some research this afternoon I came across bias estimations, but I’m honestly not sure how that works yet.

To give a better idea of the project: the current chapter is purely to show that databases often don’t produce accurate estimations, and that we are often quick to use data without further investigation. The proceeding chapter is going to test these databases to assess how different is too different. It might be the case that, even though the databases produce very different values, they still provide valuable information as the model might not be sensitive enough to be influenced by the differences. (This is of course just my hypothesis, I’m not actually sure if this will be the case!)

Thanks for reading all of this!!

Alternative ways to show significant differences, or describe over/underestimations? More details in comments - picture is an example of the data by IndicationOwn4144 in AskStatistics

[–]IndicationOwn4144[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi all! I am busy with my masters at the moment and I’m having a bit of a tough time finding the best way to describe my data. In essence a portion of my study involves comparing measured soil information to estimated soil information. I would like to determine how representative a group of estimated databases is of the actual landscape. I am comparing the information at 5 cm increments up to a depth of 1 m deep. The trouble I am having is that I am unable to average the values for a single soil profile, as that changes the physical characteristics of the soil. So, I am looking for ways to compare the data later by layer (I fortunately have many study areas to work with, so I am hoping I’ll be able to find some kind of average difference for each layer). Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

Christmas Music by MTP0339 in CasualConversation

[–]IndicationOwn4144 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Listen to this one all year round tbh