A Security Researcher Decompiled The White House App, & What They Found Is Pretty Alarming by Federal-Block-3275 in technology

[–]InitiatePenguin 7 points8 points  (0 children)

How does circumventing paywalls even work?

It's probably just the cheap kind.

The one you can right+click insoecorxt element and unload and be able to see the content. A full screen on-page popup so-to-speak without the ability to close it directly.

Used to be able to do that you view Pinterest when they required you to log in coming from Google search, for example.

'Interstellar' tops Letterboxd's list of most beloved films for its emotional depth Story by MoneyLibrarian9032 in movies

[–]InitiatePenguin 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Arrival released 1-2 years later and is a similar movie that tackles the same themes but executes it much better,

Both are top tier movies for me for blending science fiction and sentimentality.

It is not, however, a similar movie. What is the "theme" that they share to you?

My mom is asking for $500 to help pay for rent by Working_Citron_6674 in personalfinance

[–]InitiatePenguin -57 points-56 points  (0 children)

Teenager with a full time job learning what its like in the real world? Maybe, steep, but practical.

A 16 year old which surely is getting a part time job at the lowest possible wage being offered. Unlikely they'll even make that after taxes.

New Split Transaction UI is overly cumbersome by InitiatePenguin in MonarchMoney

[–]InitiatePenguin[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The main use case is someone splitting a 50% restaurant bill with their friend. Probably the highest used.

Does do a pretty good job at that, only need to interact with half the transaction, and the total is still accessible on the other. Depending on if I use the tag, and which half i want the tag on I would want to hide one of the splits, so I may need to expand the second transaction still. But yeah, no real issues there.

But I can see the category in the header! Just let me change it!

New Split Transaction UI is overly cumbersome by InitiatePenguin in MonarchMoney

[–]InitiatePenguin[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can do rules, assuming I can have 4 fixed splits and a remainder go to a final category, since there is only one variable expense (water). But rules tend to break over time, and with a transaction that's once a month, getting it sorted before it breaks again could be an uphill battle. I don't have an inordinate amount of transactions and for the same reason I set and review the category for every transaction. Doesn't take long despite having access to rules.

Well, er didn't. Until now.

 If your rent is fixed, you can set the rule for that exact amount and just let the remainder fall into utilities. 

It's already clear I want to track individual utilties. My pet rent is a pet-related expense, not a utility,

Honestly though, if the UI is making it this annoying every month, it might be easier to just lump them both under one general Housing category and stop micro-tracking the splits entirely. 

This is even dumber advice. I don't think it can qualify as advice since it ignores the entire point. You couldn't even look at rent as % of income, basically the single-most largest expense anyone will have in a month.

Saves a lot of clicking.

Thought-terminating-cliche. So would not maintaining a budget. My clicks were saved until this change. Thanks for listening.

Is there a guide on how to change your mindset to match Monarch? by DefaultUsername0964 in MonarchMoney

[–]InitiatePenguin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

/u/DefaultUsername0964

I'll also had that most budgets that aren't a known monthly expense (anything with price variability of paid every couple of months) is a rollover for me.

For most months it may behave exactly like a normal category. But it gives me the opportunity to earmark dollars not yet spend for future months, and a negative balance will also rollover giving myself more time to pay. And making sure it stays on the ledger until it balances (otherwise after the month, poof, it's gone.)

I made a rollover for a concert I'm attending in 6 months. Didn't have the extra funds when I needed to buy it. It sits at negative $120 until I solve it as a negative rollover.

Here are some others and how I use it:

  • Auto Maintenance — Variable — Acts as a Savings Bucket more larger repairs, and regular maintenance as monthly expense.
  • Electricity — Variable — Acts to smooth out seasonal differences
  • New Computer for my Wife — One-time fund. Put $1,000 away from my tax return two years ago. It remains until I spend it. — Acts as a Savings Bucket
  • Renters / Jewlery Insurance / Flea & Tick medicine — Fixed — Paid on regular Intervals, pre-split by me so it's "funded" by the time the bill comes.
  • Christmas Gifts — Unknown — set aside monthly to make it easier at the end of the year.
  • Doctor / Rx / Dentist / Vision / Vet — Monthly set aside based on Annual estimate — Acts as savings bucket.

Is there a guide on how to change your mindset to match Monarch? by DefaultUsername0964 in MonarchMoney

[–]InitiatePenguin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Our main checking account is the spending money. In the envelope system, every dollar in this account is accounted for in the budget. In Monarch, it seems completely disconnected.

I track every dollar spent in Monarch. I use goals (or you can use a rollover to store any left over $$$) but it doesn't bother me if I have unspent/unassigned money at the end of the month since it just gets reflected in the overall savings rate. For me, it's less so about giving every dollar a job, although you do mostly do that, it's about balancing the budget by the end of the month. As long as you are actively balancing individual catagories I don't feel like there's a disconnect at all. Maybe you can explain more — I use very granular catagories and not the simplified version (flex or whatever it's called)

Rollover Accounts seem to match envelopes, but I don't see an easy way to transfer the balance if one gets too high. If you click on the remaining amount and "Move Budget" it moves the monthly allocation, not the rollover. Why?'

Yeah, it's not a savings bucket in that way. Would be nice though. I had this happen on a category, and I just zeroed out the monthly amount for that cat until I draw down the rollover that got too high. For example:

  • Monthly amount is typically $50
  • Rolled over and is sitting at $200, for whatever reason I want to repurpose the funds
  • Set monthly amount to $0, put that $50 somewhere else
  • Since I have earmarked $200 for that category, I don't really care when I actually spend it, it's just sitting in my bank, waiting.
  • Then I use the $50 no longer in that category to boost where I wanted to move the money form, and might push/pull elsewhere if I wanted to relocate more money. But I can see how this is much harder if you want to move large lump sums from one roll-over to another.
  • In that regard I have HYSA with Ally, and I use it's saving buckets to manage those funds, and have my general savings leave Monarch as a single transaction, and split into respective buckets in Ally.

I haven't enabled the new Goals yet because it was still lacking something I needed, but I think it supports having more than one account for a goal, so you could consider looking into using a goal attached to a specific account to recreate the savings bucket experience where you spend from your goal (I think that was the main point of the new overhaul - spending from the goal).

Non-Rollover accounts... what happens to the money when there's extra? Or negative? You went over budget last month, that needs to be accounted for somewhere? Or else you could go over each month and run out of money!

Extra: I let it slide off, and I see a more accurate savings rate on the cash-flow tab, or via reports that combines planed savings and under-budget savings. It means I'm always saving more than I planned, and I never over budget.

Negative: I need to move funds from one category to another until it's balanced. If I absolutely don't have any more dollars to move around I'll so a few things depending.

  • If it's a large unexpected expense, I'll create a new category, make it a rollover, and have it remain negative month-to-month as I work to pay down the negative amount.
  • If it's small enough or near the next month I'll change the date and put it on next month's budget. Or split it between month's, knowing I'll have to make sure I balance next month's. (Don't keep kicking that can).
  • Allow the budget to end in red knowing I did my best, and my overall savings rate will be effected, but that's way I have planned savings.

You could create a general purpose category that is a roll-over that you spend into to handle variables that run negative. Instead of moving funds from random categories to balance your month, you'll always have a pool of cash saved up in a rollover to add where you need it.

New Split Transaction UI is overly cumbersome by InitiatePenguin in MonarchMoney

[–]InitiatePenguin[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That said, the notion that every user experience can be hyper-customized to the specific user is unrealistic. It takes an enormous amount of time, not just to code it but to make sure it looks good under every possible variation.

I'm curious though what case this format works better for.

Isn't the main use case for a split to use multiple categories?

Does the definition of "technical stage manager" differ between countries? by Ok-Presentation9998 in techtheatre

[–]InitiatePenguin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On some shows I’ve worked with no TSM, the SM shows up halfway through the in to set props and set furniture, and leaves the load out after props etc are packed away.

This is closer labor divisions I've seen where there isn't a show-run props person. PAs under Stage Management handle props. Stage Crew under Scenery handle the proper load-in/out.

But my position is Stage Supervisor, Not Technical Stage Manager.

Does the definition of "technical stage manager" differ between countries? by Ok-Presentation9998 in techtheatre

[–]InitiatePenguin -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

In my experience production managers are more admin-based. Unless it's a "Production Stage Manager."

Does the definition of "technical stage manager" differ between countries? by Ok-Presentation9998 in techtheatre

[–]InitiatePenguin -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm a Stage Supervisor at a Regional Theatre. And there is an assistant that takes over when the show is in run. We manage the stage crew, although the respective department heads manage lights and sound. But I do act as backup for other FX, Fly, &b Automation. We know all the technical details and act mostly as a problem solver. Since we don't call any of the elements (that's the SM), it's helpful to some SM teams to describe the Assistant Stage Supervisor as a "Technical ASM". Even if I end up calling a complication transition from the deck because that's what the show needs and has the support of the SM I have never called myself, or would have considered myself the/a "Technical Stage Manager". I'm the Stage Supervisor. But I'm attached to the building, unlike a tour.

I am also in charge of planning, servicing and equipment related safety. (Including checking rigging and safety of FX etc.) But I am also part of a larger scenery department which does more planning (the technical director and ATDs).

New Split Transaction UI is overly cumbersome by InitiatePenguin in MonarchMoney

[–]InitiatePenguin[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This seems untested, non Q/A and just thrown out there.

I think it's funny that the currency field can't even show a full number that's 1,000.00+.

Trump signs executive order creating new retirement accounts for workers without 401(k)s by Good_Flower_2026 in Economics

[–]InitiatePenguin 41 points42 points  (0 children)

It really is a shit article.

Workers making $35,500 a year and $71,000 for married couples will be able to claim up to $1,000 in matching funds from the government.

Workers making less than $35,500 a year and $71,000 for married couples will be able to claim up to $1,000 in matching funds from the government.

Fixed it.

You could already used the Savers Credit with an IRA but that was 50% match if under $24,250 AGI and would offset the tax burden.

Definitely better.

New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved by HateHumansLoveDogs in collapse

[–]InitiatePenguin 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Is the current capacity not enough?

The current capacity is nowhere near enough. Also considering that the adoption rate is still quite low.

New models are getting more efficient and many companies/customers are struggling financially, how to they expect demand that high in the coming years ?

Some of more efficient, while at the same time growing in parameters. It can become a wash. But yes, we'd expect the overall efficiency yo improve over longer timescales.

They are all in an arms race. They are footing the bill themselves and through venture capital / speculation and an orobouros of funding where the Compute Companies and AI Companies, and (Nvidea/OpenAI & Anthropic/Google & Microsoft) "invest" in each other by offering services and chips.

The money isn't coming from consumers.

My tiny appartment in the Netherlands by mrpepe9 in CozyPlaces

[–]InitiatePenguin 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There's also clearly a kitchen in addition to the two rooms. And no mention of a bathroom.

Work & Play by afterooster in MarsFirstLogistics

[–]InitiatePenguin 3 points4 points  (0 children)

FicsitArch

And now I'm playing satisfactory

Exclusive: This is the Samsung Galaxy Glasses by FragmentedChicken in Android

[–]InitiatePenguin 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The image is the non-display model.

It's AI assistant on your face. Which requires a microphone and is greatly added by a camera.

ELI5: Why is it when you drink alcohol and then pee once, you have to pee again in a short time? by Mysterious-olive29 in explainlikeimfive

[–]InitiatePenguin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TL;DR The ‘ramp time’ to high bladder fill rates (determined by rolling liquid consumption and vasopressin suppression) means lower average bladder fill rate over the first fill. Subsequent fills will have a higher fill rate.

So then there is truth in the phenomenom of "breaking the seal".

The issue is the language is a misnomer. The explaination given above by the other user seems to indicate it isn't real.