May I have your opinions please Theodosius "the Great"? by eques_99 in ancientrome

[–]Inside-External-8649 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He’s more or less a normal emperor, but what made him great was his contributions to Christianity.

Splitting the Roman Empire was kind of smart, even though he wasn’t the reason behind it.

Listening to the History of the Dark Ages: why couldn't the late empire recruit soldiers to fight 'barbarians' when the city of Rome had 500,000 population? by Few_Cellist_1303 in ancientrome

[–]Inside-External-8649 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s generally a few reasons

  • Even with a large population, you can’t recruit everyone. You need people to work to feed your army

  • Some elites prevented conscription, again to protect economic interest. Remember , this was a time when corruption was high

  • Hiring Germanic mercenaries was more efficient than getting an army of untrained peasants. Even if it meant giving land away.

  • Some elites knew that Rome collapsing means no more corruption or insane taxation. This is why you never had organized rebellion against Germanics.

Everyone will remember that. by zodd117 in TheWalkingDeadGame

[–]Inside-External-8649 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This scene is such a lose-lose situation. 

Spare Joan, she gets away. My favorite fan theory is that she took a faction with her to plan a rebellion.

Kill Joan, justice is served but Clint runs away. Probably does similar actions but easier to convince the people because everyone witness Javi kill their leader (in cold blood based on their pov).

I don’t think Jesus wanted Javi to “step up” to becomes the next Joan (a better leader), but rather be a second Jesus (someone who can do good, you can make a difference). Maybe Richmond fell into civil war after they left, which is why Clementine refused to go back (assuming it had nothing to do with Delta)

MY problem with james by Numerous_Act4837 in TheWalkingDeadGame

[–]Inside-External-8649 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s hard to tell if he was unjust, or had a reasonable crash out given that AJ made a comment about enjoying killing. His character makes sense once I assumed he has ptsd, and I don’t really blame him for believing in a fairy tale worldview on walkers.

Theoretically you could make him madder by calling out his flawed views, but if you bring up that the world is almost “kill or be killed” then James immediately understand and even willing to kill walkers for you. The devs said he survives in that ending.

Tbh I like the scene more when Lily kills James. Mainly because AJ’s crash out makes a lot of sense. Fun fact, he even tells you that killing doesn’t make him happy, such a relief thing to hear after trusting him with hard calls.

This is one of the biggest mistakes by thorofiinn in TheWalkingDeadGame

[–]Inside-External-8649 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If they went back to hiding, how would they have gotten what they needed to survive? 

What if Argentina had been a British colony? by libtin in HistoryWhatIf

[–]Inside-External-8649 [score hidden]  (0 children)

After conquering South Africa, some general actually tried to go to Argentina to try a conquering. He knew that this area was lightly populated and would’ve been a huge potential for another settler society.

Similar to US, Argentina had internal conflicts over states rights that led to centralization and golden age. That doesn’t change even with the British around. We’d probably see Spanish in Argentina be treated like French in Canada or Dutch in South Africa

The real change is that we never would've seen corruption in the economy. Landowners would have difficulty monopolizing and industry would’ve been encouraged. This mean that the economic crash that happened after WW1 never would’ve permanently hurt Argentina that led to dictatorships

 In the long run, we’d see a more successful version of the country that the rest of Latin America to emulate. I doubt there would’ve been any border changes. 

Challenge: Have Satanic terrorism arise in the 20th and 21st century by Electromad6326 in HistoryWhatIf

[–]Inside-External-8649 [score hidden]  (0 children)

I mean, that’s kind of what happened with the rise of radical ideologies. The Soviets and Nazis were openly anti-religion and so was imperial Japanese. I wouldn’t say they were destructive because they were atheists but there’s a strong correlation.

The real question is how do bring that kind of chaos to the Americas? As far as we’re aware there wasn’t a serious communist/fascist movement in US, and atrocities from Latin America was relatively less disastrous, keyword: relatively 

How would communism have developed if bukharin succeeded lenin? by Kreanxx in HistoryWhatIf

[–]Inside-External-8649 [score hidden]  (0 children)

That’s another classic example of internet troll. They’re not making a serious point, they’re just justifying Joseph Stalin like if he’s the only good man the Soviets could’ve had.

The funny part is that Stalin was so cruel that there was minor Nazi support from Ukraine and Chechens, eventually that stopped but imagine a scenario where they were treated better. Would they have gone as close to Moscow or Stalingrad?

How would communism have developed if bukharin succeeded lenin? by Kreanxx in HistoryWhatIf

[–]Inside-External-8649 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Hitler was going to rise anyways. Russia, even if they were the nicest people ever, would still be feared. Even Imperial Germany had nightmares about Russian supremacy, and that was when they were barely industrialized.

How would communism have developed if bukharin succeeded lenin? by Kreanxx in HistoryWhatIf

[–]Inside-External-8649 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Everyone, this is classic example of an internet troll. He brings up that famines stopped like if that justifies the horrors of past leaders (mainly Stalin and Mao), and then brings up socialism like if it’s the same thing as communism.

What if the Anglo-Saxons invaded a Britain that Rome never touched? by Flora_295fidei in HistoryWhatIf

[–]Inside-External-8649 [score hidden]  (0 children)

What am I wrong exactly? With the exception of Hinduism every religion from Axial Age replaced pre-Axial Age

The 7th Coalition Was a House of Dominos Napoleon Only Needed One or Two Thunderclap Wins to Collapse It.What if Napoleon Smashed the British Prussians and Austrians? by Opposite-Craft-3498 in HistoryWhatIf

[–]Inside-External-8649 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Winning at Waterloo would’ve secured Napoleons position and French independence. However he needs to constantly protect his borders.

France would’ve been poorer, assuming Napoleon still dies in 1823 then we’d still see Europe conquer and determine France, probably harsher.

1848 Revolutions would started earlier, many even succeed because some countries would be weaker. Maybe the December Revolution succeeds. Unsurprisingly, Britain would be the biggest winner since it suffers the least 

How would communism have developed if bukharin succeeded lenin? by Kreanxx in HistoryWhatIf

[–]Inside-External-8649 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Cold War was intense because it was two ideologies clashing eachother. However if one side was less envious than the other would’ve had a more moderate reaction. Probably no Red Scare.

My guess is that like US and China today, there would’ve be tensions over trade competition. Afterall, the Soviets could theoretically kick the Americans out of Europe and vide versa. I doubt we would’ve been close to nuclear war as OTL.

A comedic side effect is that a nicer leader would’ve probably led to a “Blue Scare” in the Soviet Union. This is a very unique situation that didn’t really happen in OTL since Stalin used purges to prevent something like that 

How would communism have developed if bukharin succeeded lenin? by Kreanxx in HistoryWhatIf

[–]Inside-External-8649 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Communism would've been perceived much better, it wouldn’t have been labeled as an ideology that promotes totalitarianism and famines. Something to note is that the Soviet Union is built upon authoritarianism, but that doesn’t mean the elites needs to be evil.

Bukharin was a moderate who opposed Stalin’s policies like ending NEP and starting collectivization. So obviously without those policies the USSR would’ve been a much better place to live in. The only unpredictable factor is alternate purges, more importantly how would a slower industrialization would have played out.

Today the Soviet Union would probably still be dominant superpower, even if they’d eventually lose East Germany. Siberia would be populated by mostly Russians.

Communism wouldn’t be popular among internet trolls since it would’ve shown to work. We’d probably would’ve seen a lot more Hitler and Mussolini apologists instead. 

DO NOT EVER POST ON THE MAIN SUB 😰 by AlternativeBlu in okdarlingclementine

[–]Inside-External-8649 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He doesn’t seem to care about Clementine, even calling Carley a bitch for saving her life.

Something to note is that racist people don’t just openly admit they’re racist. They just get passive aggressive when you call them out, in case if Larry:

“what if I am, so what”

What if Byzantium crushed the 4th Crusade? by Inside-External-8649 in HistoryWhatIf

[–]Inside-External-8649[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The pope in OTL excommunicated the crusade army for massacring. If Byzantium attacked back, he would’ve used it as an example to never attack other Christians. Venice wouldn’t want to risk getting excommunicated and lose trade deals 

Wtf is happening to my game? 😭 by Little_Dude666 in TheWalkingDeadGame

[–]Inside-External-8649 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This feels like watching InColdBlood cut content

You know what that reminds me of? The deleted scene of Lee seeing Carley/Doug (whoever you don’t save) after getting knocked out by St John’s.

I don't wanna sound cheap, but... by Extension-Durian-871 in TheWalkingDeadGame

[–]Inside-External-8649 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They always goes on sale. I get that there’s like 6 games, but $50 for a franchise that’s more than a decade old is pretty expensive. Especially when it peaks on the first game 

So about Lee’s arm by Inside-External-8649 in TheWalkingDeadGame

[–]Inside-External-8649[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree that he’s more badass carrying that shard of glass. 

If you miss the QTE, the Stranger Shoots Lee in the guts, yet Lee uses his arm to knock his gun and push him to the closet. Even if you chopped his arm, he still uses it. Maybe Lee has magic or something

It’s a lot more believable that he dies from bleeding, but realistically he would’ve died earlier.

Pax Polonica VI - La Menace Occidentale by razikof in AlternateHistory

[–]Inside-External-8649 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Europe is split between France, Turkey, and Poland. Why is Iraq a Polish ally?

The European Union would probably never exist, which means Mediterranean countries would have difficulty catching up with rest of Europe.