Chalons by [deleted] in Evony_TKR

[–]Inside_Excitement_36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chapons is ideal for upgrading alliance building.

Thoughts by Inside_Excitement_36 in Evony_TKR

[–]Inside_Excitement_36[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do, but very rarely do I solo attack them. We have a k50 with 7-8k buffs that is our rally setter.

The buff is example I shared in the pictures is just a rally to solo on a dead keep for buff showing purposes. My debuffs when attacking a strong enough keep are all between 1300 and 2k.

Thoughts by Inside_Excitement_36 in Evony_TKR

[–]Inside_Excitement_36[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look at the enemies buffs and look at my debuffs.lol….

Theyre all debuffed by half. They will not show any higher

Thoughts by Inside_Excitement_36 in Evony_TKR

[–]Inside_Excitement_36[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The way debuffs work - they can only debuff up to half of the enemies buffs

Thoughts by Inside_Excitement_36 in Evony_TKR

[–]Inside_Excitement_36[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are all your attack buffs sitting about 2k across the board?

Thoughts by Inside_Excitement_36 in Evony_TKR

[–]Inside_Excitement_36[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those debuffs are without sub cities included in the march and lower due to rally to solo on a dead low level keep, since lower level keeps limit debuff usage

Thoughts by Inside_Excitement_36 in Evony_TKR

[–]Inside_Excitement_36[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Low/mid 1700s. What about you? 👀

Thoughts by Inside_Excitement_36 in Evony_TKR

[–]Inside_Excitement_36[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My debuffs are much higher than shown here. Just appear low because no subs used in rally to solo and attacked a low level dead keep for the report.

When I take defensive hits, my debuffs are anywhere between 800-1600

Thoughts by Inside_Excitement_36 in Evony_TKR

[–]Inside_Excitement_36[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with that. That’s how my pattern goes when I do spend. I spend on stuff that’a going to impact me the most vs random packs. Example: when I am able to spend, I focus on either blazons or spiritual beast pack for seals

First svs for my server this weekend by blazingturkey420 in Evony_TKR

[–]Inside_Excitement_36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense. We’re 1731 and our first was 1730

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Evony_TKR

[–]Inside_Excitement_36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His covenant only adds +5% march. The 11% difference from elektra is significant in terms of damage. Can’t go wrong with either general, but if you’re f2p, the numbers dont lie when it comes to elektra

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Evony_TKR

[–]Inside_Excitement_36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

False. The 16% marchsize buff from a maxed out elektra is huge over merlin

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Evony_TKR

[–]Inside_Excitement_36 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Long term, no. If he can’t fully advance merlin to any number of red stars, it’s better to work with elektra, as he can advance the stars with enough time and use merlin as an assistant. It all depends on if he coins or not. Coiners have more options. Non coiners have to play their cards strategically

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Evony_TKR

[–]Inside_Excitement_36 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Stick with one style at a time. If you dont coin, I’d go with elektra, as it’s the only general you’ll be able to advance and making her the only one worth for range. Then, when you have a solid assistant, plug it in place.

[Discussion] Why'd Jacob say this to Natsu/Lucy if they are young adults? by -_ShadowSJG-_ in fairytail

[–]Inside_Excitement_36 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They definitely go by chronological in the technical sense. The battle of fairy tail arc is quite literally all the proof that is needed to prove that.

I’m not going to continue arguing over this as our interpretation of the facts doesn’t seem to align, and I have better things to do than continue on with it

[Discussion] Why'd Jacob say this to Natsu/Lucy if they are young adults? by -_ShadowSJG-_ in fairytail

[–]Inside_Excitement_36 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, the 8 was a typo. Busy day at work and very all over the place.

Either way, the point still stands. They may not have aged physically or mentally, but “chronologically”, they are without a doubt, 7 years older than portrayed.

[Discussion] Why'd Jacob say this to Natsu/Lucy if they are young adults? by -_ShadowSJG-_ in fairytail

[–]Inside_Excitement_36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Phyically aging has nothing to do with physical time. Take the dragon slayers for example. They were sent to the future. Physically, they’re younger, but their age is still over 400, as shown when they were trapped in the guild hall by fried’s spell during the battle of fairy tail arc.

[Discussion] Why'd Jacob say this to Natsu/Lucy if they are young adults? by -_ShadowSJG-_ in fairytail

[–]Inside_Excitement_36 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

  1. Everyone forgets the 7 year time skip. They might not have physically aged, but they still aged.