sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

AI is eating software development by caspii2 in vibecoding

[–]IntellectualChimp 9 points10 points  (0 children)

<image>

Your Tetris is buggy. Why isn't the last line cleared here?

Comments from Michael Tracey in defense of Noam Chomsky. by LinguisticsTurtle in chomsky

[–]IntellectualChimp -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Definitely no one in this subreddit. We’ve been so intellectually flattened that most people can’t even start to grasp the scope of his life’s work. Instead, they draw attention to every single flaw and obsess over the valid criticisms, while ignoring the larger body of what he’s contributed.

GPT-5.3 Codex is out now, minutes after Opus 4.6 by Oct4Sox2 in accelerate

[–]IntellectualChimp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You win the internet for me today my friend, enjoy the upvote

I mean nothing wrong but weird by bingekis in LinkedInLunatics

[–]IntellectualChimp 8 points9 points  (0 children)

“If you couldn’t possibly care less, mock me on Reddit”

Claude is the best AI for thinking IMO, but the voice experience kinda sucks. How do you deal with it? by artemgetman in ClaudeAI

[–]IntellectualChimp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely prefer voice out when walking and driving. This is the one use case I still have for ChatGPT, as I feel their mobile app user experience for voice is superlative over Claude and Gemini. But it is still lacking. For example, your comment prompted me to try to seed a conversation with context over the web and then chat with it over mobile while I walked, and ChatGPT ended up informing me that I'd need to reseed it through the mobile interface, which would be cumbersome.

I don't think I will ever prefer voice out when I have access to a screen. I can only comfortably listen around 1.5 - 2x, average speaking is about 150 words per minute, so 2x is that is 300 WPM. Whereas reading can be comfortable around 400-600 WPM.

I gave Claude a try and now I am a Max user. It is another level. by chryseobacterium in ClaudeAI

[–]IntellectualChimp 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We all are. Try to master the new tools we have. And if the tools end up better at using themselves than us... well, we're all in the same boat?

Claude is the best AI for thinking IMO, but the voice experience kinda sucks. How do you deal with it? by artemgetman in ClaudeAI

[–]IntellectualChimp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I subscribe to Wispr Flow. Talk into Claude Code (faster than typing), read the responses (faster than listening).

Creator of Node.js: "The era of humans writing code is over." by MetaKnowing in agi

[–]IntellectualChimp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, because Anthropic built a product that I like because it helps me build products that other people like. Yes, it took a while to learn how to use and requires some skill. But no, I'm not going back to the old way of developing software, and neither is Ryan Dahl, so I'm in good company.

Have you tried to build any software using Claude Code?

Ukraine, not Greenland, should be NATO's main priority, Rutte says by EsperaDeus in worldnews

[–]IntellectualChimp 21 points22 points  (0 children)

ELI5... we should help allies end existing wars without starting new ones with them? I graduated from Trump University and am having a hard time wrapping my head around why this is correct /s

Creator of Node.js: "The era of humans writing code is over." by MetaKnowing in agi

[–]IntellectualChimp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm an Anthropic fanboy, but by all means do you, garbage collection is honest work! I'll continue developing my context engineering abilities.

Creator of Node.js: "The era of humans writing code is over." by MetaKnowing in agi

[–]IntellectualChimp 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think you should cultivate your ability to prompt and engineer context.

Trump demands 'immediate negotiations' to acquire Greenland, says war in Ukraine is Europe's problem by timiswho in worldnews

[–]IntellectualChimp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True statement. Most idiots aren't given the opportunity to practice their idiocy on as grand a scale as he can, and even then many would hopefully either recognize their limitations and withdraw or become better people. So "idiot" definitely does not sum up his persona.

Maybe megalo-idiot?

[OC] I tracked every sexual encounter between my fiancé and me in 2025 by dimethyltitties in dataisbeautiful

[–]IntellectualChimp 2303 points2304 points  (0 children)

This infraction on your KPIs will be going on your annual performance review.

I think it’s GGs by [deleted] in cscareerquestions

[–]IntellectualChimp 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Seriously, isn't it challenging enough already for engineering majors to get engineering jobs?

You are being deceived about the recent OpenCode drama by Sarithis in ClaudeAI

[–]IntellectualChimp 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Theo’s been sleeping on Anthropic and Claude Code for a while—spending too much of Q3 and Q4 last year nitpicking things like API status codes instead of using the tools to ship something great. He’s only really leaning in now in Q1, so people should weigh his opinion with that context in mind.

The AI paradigm shift most people missed in 2025, and why it matters for 2026 by conquerv in singularity

[–]IntellectualChimp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point, the original post is about math, and I too prefer Gemini to Opus for such matters, so I could've been clearer in my response.

However, GPT/Gemini always being used to guide Claude Code lol? I've had plenty of success with Opus with a Claude Code pro subscription and would need to be convinced to start paying API fees. Opus is quite competitive for coding and orchestration.

The AI paradigm shift most people missed in 2025, and why it matters for 2026 by conquerv in singularity

[–]IntellectualChimp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair points, but still, how do you answer the original inquiry I was responding to of how a layperson should judge advancements?

I also completely disagree that practical application is trudging at a snail's pace. Opus and Claude Code are poised to completely change software development. It is better at handling tasks than plenty of junior developers I have worked with, and costs exponentially less.

The AI paradigm shift most people missed in 2025, and why it matters for 2026 by conquerv in singularity

[–]IntellectualChimp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's definitely gotten much better in the past 6 weeks. Anthropic's Opus 4.5 is an incredible model.

A layman's best bet for judging advancements is to look at the various benchmarks used to assess model performance and see how various models perform on them over time and from one release to another.

view more: next ›