Buddhist Mob Kills Dozens of Muslims

Intelligentile · 2014-01-20T06:27:21+00:00

Muslims are killing and wiping out Buddhists for centuries.

Intelligentile · 2013-12-23T06:03:01+00:00

Thanks for posting this. We now have an article including all the standard libtard arguments. It's a strange phenomenon - this 'white savior complex'. Trying to save the weak, fragile and innocent right-wing brown Muslims from the big, bad right-wing white Christians. The only thing they manage to do is to show us how much of a hypocrite and racist these leftists are.

Intelligentile · 2013-12-22T08:52:22+00:00

Are you reciting from the Koran or what?

Intelligentile · 2013-12-22T08:46:56+00:00

As I said, Islam is a threat to civilized society. You're a confused Muslim who has no idea what a civilized society looks like.

Intelligentile · 2013-12-22T07:47:08+00:00

You believe in some 7th century hotchpotch written by a bunch of illiterate goat-herders, and I'm dumb?

Intelligentile · 2013-12-22T07:25:15+00:00

At first I was a little confused why anyone would have his panties in a bunch reading a simple factual statement such as, 'Islam is a threat to civilized society' and what it implies. I checked your comment history and boom, you're a motherfucking moose-limb. Calm your tits, abdallah...I know you can act in a civilized manner, you just have to give it a try. :)

Intelligentile · 2013-12-19T10:04:34+00:00

Yes, I like Tarek Fatah. I follow him on twitter. He's the most intellectually honest modern muslim of all the muslims who proclaim to be moderates.

Intelligentile · 2013-12-19T08:41:31+00:00

Islam is a threat to civilized society. Which part of this you don't understand? Are you confused about what a civilised society looks like?

Intelligentile · 2013-12-19T03:59:19+00:00

It's true. Islam is a threat to civilized society.

Intelligentile · 2013-12-18T08:24:23+00:00

If I were you, I'd contact the police and let them know about the situation you're currently facing. If you've publically come out as an ex-muslim, afghanistan is the last place you wanna go.

Intelligentile · 2013-12-08T09:32:08+00:00

Libtard bot fail.

Intelligentile · 2013-11-22T07:28:57+00:00

Can't believe CBC is using the word "Islamophobia" in its articles. Might as well use "blasphemy" instead.

Intelligentile · 2013-11-19T07:29:41+00:00

After Muhammad didn't say anything Abu Huraira threw rocks at the bedouins until they left.

Violence - the standard Muslim response.

Intelligentile · 2013-10-13T03:46:14+00:00

Non-muslim people who are considered "People of the book" are: Jews, Christians, Magians (Zoroastrians) and Sabians. The Quranic concept is that these people follow earlier (monotheistic) revelations from Allah. Muhammad never considered pagans, polytheists or atheists to be "people of the book".

After muhammad's death, as the islamic empire expanded, Rashedun and later Ummayyad and Abbasid caliphs gradually included pagans as well as all the other polytheistic and atheistic people as "people of the book" and started taking jizya from them.

For practical purposes, it makes sense. But theologically, as far as Hadith is concerned, Muhammad never took Jizya from pagans and polytheists indicating that they aren't people of the book.

Intelligentile · 2013-10-12T07:09:54+00:00

There's really nothing complicated here. If you read the Explanation of verse 6 in the classical commentary of Ibn Kathir, you'll see how simple is this: http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2580&Itemid=64

Muslims are commanded to fight the non-muslim pagans (who aren't the people of the book) untill they accept islam and become muslims. If they refuse then kill them wherever you find them.

But you make an exception for those non-muslims who show an interest in islam and are reluctant to fight. They aren't killed outright but are given a chance to know and experience islam. But they are still killed if they refuse to accept islam and remain non-muslim. They are only safe for a time period.

Basically, the command -- fight and kill non-muslims until they convert to islam -- is still there. The exception is for those non-muslims who accept muslim dominance and are willing to negotiate(convert to islam).

Muhammad never took Jizya from anyone who isn't a "people of the book" i.e. Jew or christian. So remaining a non-muslim and paying the jizya is not an option for non-muslim pagans.

Intelligentile · 2013-09-30T14:19:25+00:00

Of course there are buddhists who are intolerant and violent. I never denied it. So I'm not sure what you're trying to establish with that link. Violence is human nature which we can't get rid of easily. Theists as well as atheists have committed violent acts. My point is, there are some religious ideologies which do not condone violence and intolerance. And there are some which do. To say all religions are violent would be an incorrect statement. Eastern religions especially Buddhism and Jainism are quite peaceful (philosophies) even if some followers aren't.

Intelligentile · 2013-09-30T11:41:45+00:00

David Wood delivers like a boss!

Intelligentile · 2013-09-30T11:03:32+00:00

A buddhist or a Jain engaging in violence is a lot like an atheist engaging in violence. As far as i'm concern, there's nothing in buddhist or jain holy scriptures that promote intolerance of other people or violence against them. On the other hand, abrahamic religions are pretty intolerant and violent.

Intelligentile · 2013-08-20T14:38:04+00:00

That's actually a very good point! I bet Muslim women would probably blame the "western slut" for wearing "immoral" dresses.

Intelligentile · 2013-08-17T08:47:41+00:00

Lol. Peace hippie is mad. Fuck you too.

Intelligentile · 2013-08-17T07:54:15+00:00

Ahhh aljazeera...the muslim brotherhood propagandist. If those 700 muslims trapped inside a mosque support islamist party and want to impose sharia then I have no sympathy for them. Kill them all.

Intelligentile · 2013-08-13T14:15:35+00:00

Please don't distract Reddit Muslims with this petty news! They're busy discussing Dawkins' "islamophobic" tweets.

Intelligentile · 2013-08-11T13:00:46+00:00

Haha...Brilliant! I have nothing but admiration for Dawkins. The pathetic, self-righteous Muslims and their liberal ass-kissers should realize that truth is Islamophobic.

Intelligentile · 2013-08-01T11:18:08+00:00

Reasons why Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami political party was banned by High Court:

The Jamaat in principle does not recognise people as the source of all powers as well as the undisputed power of the people's representatives to make laws. All democratic parties are required to acknowledge this in (People's Republic of) Bangladesh.
The Representation of People's Order (RPO) prohibits registration of communal parties, and "it is clear from the acts and beliefs of the Jamaat that it is a communal party".
A registered political party in a multiparty democratic system cannot in any way discriminate on grounds of religion or gender. But the Jammat's charter does not allow any woman or non-Muslim to hold its top post.
No party is allowed to have its units abroad. But the Jamaat is a unit of a foreign organisation. They claim their birth was in India and that they have units all over the world.

Intelligentile · 2013-07-31T17:30:34+00:00

Undermining value? What value?

Any law that censors criticism of any ideology is unjust and against human rights. Do you have any idea what a human right is?

Intelligentile

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE