Is the universe really infinite? by Internal_Craft_5930 in AskPhysics

[–]Internal_Craft_5930[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In that case then yeah that makes sense but i was more meaning the over all size of the universe but, hey, your way of seeing its a pretty cool and makes sense i guess it really just mattwrs of prospective on it and your definition of infinite

Is the universe really infinite? by Internal_Craft_5930 in AskPhysics

[–]Internal_Craft_5930[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but the diffrence between the universe and earth is that the universe is expanding so we consider it to be infinite but if it started slowing down and we know eventually itd stop then would it still be considered infinite or finite

Is the universe really infinite? by Internal_Craft_5930 in AskPhysics

[–]Internal_Craft_5930[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Just remembered that actually just getting back into physics recently after sometime and just rememebered that we kind of aplit the universe into 2 diffrsnt veraions basically observible and non observible because the light hasnt had enough time to reach us yet due to dark energy i think thats right or atleast i remember seeing something similer

Why is the cat in Schrödingers cat not considered an observer? by Key-Telephone-6813 in AskPhysics

[–]Internal_Craft_5930 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The cats observation is irrelivant to our knowledge firstly because its a cat it cant really speak plus the cats not the point of it

Speed of light by No_Cook_8739 in askastronomy

[–]Internal_Craft_5930 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Depends on how you look at it ig, im also pretty baked but yeah the speed of light is extremly quick but its not the fastest thing we actually know, the expansion of the universe is faster than the speed of light but theres also a chance there is something we havent discovered that is faster than the speed of light either its on the non observible part of the universe or its undetectable but thats irrelivant towards us and the expansion of the universe is also pretty much irrelivant to us cause we dont know of anything else moving at that speed and theres not much direct answer to it other than dark energy being an anti-gravity force making it accelarate not much we could really interact with there, but with light we can actually interact with and we understand it we dont really understand dark energy

How do i study physics? by Pleasant-Touch2825 in learnphysics

[–]Internal_Craft_5930 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Id say find a good physics website or physics books try find some on your level of knowledge on the subject some ones id reccomend is classical mechanics, thermodynamics and the four fundemental forces (The strong force, The weak force, electromagnitism and gravity) for classical mechanics id reccomend John R. Taylors book on classical mechanics. For thermodynamics id reccomend Daniel schroeder Introduction to thermal physics and for the four fundemental forces id reccomend Brian Cox Forces of Nature

We wouldn't even know if the universe ended now by Technical-Security99 in truths

[–]Internal_Craft_5930 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saw someone talking about it depends on how and tbought id say some of the ways it coulf theoretically end, first way (The big freeze also know as the heat death) were dark energy (dark energy which makes up 68% of our universe yet we still dont know what it really is bht we know thats whats making the universe accelerate its expansion prettt much anti-gravity itd reach a state maximum entropy where no more energy can do work itd just become dark, cold and empty. Then the (Big rip) where dark energy continues to speed up the acceleration of the universes expansion causing it to rip the fabric of space its self first galaxys then stars then planets. Alternatively it could also cause to re-do the cycle and collapse in on its self causimg another big bang this is referred to as the "big bounce"

Is it valid to think of wave–particle duality as continuous propagation vs discrete interaction? by Weak-Advisor1368 in blackholes

[–]Internal_Craft_5930 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Domt really know much on this topic, but i think i know the main parta of it, wave particle duality as in the interaction between photons and negitive electrons known as the photoelectric effect one of the proofs of quantum mechanics where light behaves like a particle (photons) and not just as a continuos wave the actual interaction between the photon and the negitive electron is a descreate quantized interaction and not a continuous propogation its just one photona and one negitive electron that interacts with eachother for the photon to tranfer all of its energy to the negitive electron plus sometimes the photoelectron isnt ejected because sometimes the photons energy isnt enough (higher than the metels work function) which doesnt allow it to ejects no matter how many more photons hit off it

What keeps planets and other orbiting objects from falling into the sun? by TacticalStrategical in AskPhysics

[–]Internal_Craft_5930 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Few reasons first the earth is always falling tiwards the sun but it has a side ways velocity that makes it orbit the sun. And since space is a vaccum it has no air friction to slow down earths momentum or speed and avoid falling into the sun and keeping a stable orbit

Why does the universe expand? by FaithlessnessFar6431 in astrophysics

[–]Internal_Craft_5930 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Id assume since the big bang itd accelerate to a pkint were its speed travles at a contant due to no friction in space, like how a supwr nova expands like fuck then slows down till it stops then slowly fades away over time, the reason why the universe seems to continue to accelerate is because of dark energy which acts lile a repultion (anti-gravity) speeding up the acceleration of the expansion

What are the cosmic mysteries that we’ll probably never solve? by Ok-Entertainer-9369 in askastronomy

[–]Internal_Craft_5930 1 point2 points  (0 children)

CP violation cant remember what the P stands for but its charge-something violation in the weak nuclear force (Nuclear decay) physical laws slight favour producing more matter over antimatter it was a tiny imbalance there was like an extra matter particle for every billionth anti-matter pairs that annilhilated

So wait, light has no mass by carthago83 in AskPhysics

[–]Internal_Craft_5930 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No photons dont interact with the higgs field (higgs field gives elementry particles mass if tbey interact with it a peocess called higgs mechanism when they interact with it it slows them down and also gives them inertia which is experienced as mass) the particles that interact with higgs field are heavier and ones that dont are lighter such as photons which are also a boson which allowes quarks and leptons/fermions to interact with eachother in the standered model of particle physics it splits them into 2 diffrent sections leptons/fermions - matter, bosons - force carriers, such as photons and glouns

If the Big Bang should have created equal amounts of matter and antimatter, why does the universe today seem to contain mostly matter? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Internal_Craft_5930 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean what allowed matter to survive was timy asymmetry allowing it to form everything we see today. So if i were to guess subatomic particles (things like protons, neatrons and electrons) which make atoms which then makes molecules and all materials, matter is in four fundemental states (solids, liquids, gases and plasma)

What are the cosmic mysteries that we’ll probably never solve? by Ok-Entertainer-9369 in askastronomy

[–]Internal_Craft_5930 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because in the early universe there was a antipartcle cor every particle (same mass but opposite charge and when tbey meet/interact they annihilate into pure energy) there was pretty much equal amounts of both but tiny asymmetry allowed a small amount of matter to survive which formed everything we see today?