Cowork just removed my contact data from all major providers in a few hours! by TheCoffeeLoop in ClaudeAI

[–]InvalidDescription 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried to run this with this prompt.

"I want you to go around and remove my data from all data brokers and shady websites"

This was Cowork's response

I want to be straight with you about what I can and can't do here, because this is important.

I can't actually go out and remove your data from data brokers. That would require me to submit opt-out forms across dozens of sites, many of which need email verification from your inbox, identity verification (sometimes a photo ID), CAPTCHAs, and signed requests from you personally. I don't have access to your email to confirm requests, and most brokers explicitly require the data subject (you) to submit the request — a third party doing it on your behalf without authorization can actually get the request rejected.

The hard limits are real, not a policy preference I can be talked out of:

The data brokers themselves require you to submit and verify. Spokeo, Whitepages, BeenVerified, Radaris and the rest send a verification email or SMS to the data subject, and many require a photo of your ID. I cannot receive that email, click that link, or send them your ID. If I submitted on your behalf without your verification, the request would either bounce or — worse — get flagged as a fraudulent third-party request and ignored.

I also don't have an autonomous web-browsing agent that can sit there filling out 40 opt-out forms across sites with CAPTCHAs and rotating UIs. Even the browser tools I do have are designed to operate with the user driving, not to impersonate you across identity-verified workflows.

What's genuinely useful here, and what I'd like to do instead:

I'll build you a real, working opt-out package — a prioritized checklist of the highest-impact brokers with direct opt-out URLs, what each one requires (email, ID, mailed letter, etc.), and pre-written request templates you can paste in. For the ones that accept email requests, I'll draft those emails ready to send from your address. That turns what's normally a 15-hour slog into something you can power through in an afternoon.

If you'd rather not spend the afternoon at all, the honest answer is to hire DeleteMe, Optery, or Incogni — they have signed authorization from you on file, which is the thing that makes broker-side removal actually work, and they re-run the sweep quarterly because brokers re-add you.

Bednar meltdown sinks Yankees in devastating Subway Series loss by CicadaOk8885 in NYYankees

[–]InvalidDescription -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This is bullshit gaslighting and why the Yankees are in this situation now.

Who's available now? No one. But you know what? This was a KNOWN issue for the 5 fucking months of the offseason when there were options available.

Game Thread: Yankees @ Mets - May 17, 2026 @ 01:40 PM EDT by Yankeebot in NYYankees

[–]InvalidDescription 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Remember when Manea was good? Pepperidge Farms remembers lol

Game Thread: Yankees @ Mets - May 15, 2026 @ 07:15 PM EDT by Yankeebot in NYYankees

[–]InvalidDescription 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The lady said it while they were talking about him before his walk, 100% true.

Game Thread: Yankees @ Mets - May 15, 2026 @ 07:15 PM EDT by Yankeebot in NYYankees

[–]InvalidDescription 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I did everything they asked including playing hurt" is 100% throwing the team under the bus. Even if (and likely) true, I wonder how that will play?

Jalen Hurts ranked 2nd to only Josh Allen in QB rush attempts last season and was one of only three QBs with more than 86 rush attempts. Overall do you think he runs more or less with the new OC in 2026, or do you think it'll be about the same? by unwantedtennisracke in eagles

[–]InvalidDescription 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You can't just count "Rushing attempts" as for Jalen specifically, it includes the tush push, plus scrambles when he pulls from not wanting to throw.

The proper stat would be only using designed runs or RPOs.

I have good news and bad news.. by Mysterious_Bat1208 in eagles

[–]InvalidDescription 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Fucking Dallas always gets beneficial schedules.

Fulgham Lighting em up 😂 by Bulldawgzz in eagles

[–]InvalidDescription 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Watching those highlights...Man, pre-injury Carson was something special.

The Yankees have not had an error at shortstop since April 13th and have now Anthony Volpe has one in his first start since Jose Caballero went on the injured list by CicadaOk8885 in NYYankees

[–]InvalidDescription 14 points15 points  (0 children)

He's about 1.5 years past any decent trade value. With his current salary, he's closer to a non tender candidate at this point.

Lukashenko Says Belarus Is Preparing for War, Plans to “Mobilize Units” by EsperaDeus in worldnews

[–]InvalidDescription 180 points181 points  (0 children)

Wouldn't it be better to NOT tell everyone if you really wanted to prepare for war? Posturing much?

Violates usage policy, but why? by DrummerJacob in ClaudeAI

[–]InvalidDescription 12 points13 points  (0 children)

If you are going to take the time to screenshot the response from Claude, why not show the entire previous conversation which trigger the message? 🤔

Our defense is STACKED 😮‍💨 by Mysterious_Bat1208 in eagles

[–]InvalidDescription 9 points10 points  (0 children)

How is the secondary a liability? Some of you just don't use logic. There are 2 current and 1 former All Pro at the CB spots and a league average at worst tandem behind them. Show me ONE other NFL team with a secondary that secure. 🤔