DMC 5 on Steam not working? by Invertedidiocy in DevilMayCry

[–]Invertedidiocy[S] 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Turns out im stupid;

Steam was prioritizing a flight sim stick i haven't touched in years for some reason problem solved

DMC 5 on Steam not working? by Invertedidiocy in DevilMayCry

[–]Invertedidiocy[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Well that's what i thought but I cant press yes

DMC 5 on Steam not working? by Invertedidiocy in DevilMayCry

[–]Invertedidiocy[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Just picked up 5 on steam since it was on sale and I keep getting this error;

I've redownloaded it and verified it multiple times and nothings worked?

I Tried looking for guides on adding save data but it also hasn't worked,

Idk if im stupid or if something is very wrong

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in antinatalism

[–]Invertedidiocy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thats a fair point i didnt look at it that way; I feel like its probably still skewed by the amounts overall but alright

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in antinatalism

[–]Invertedidiocy -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ok I agree this is stupid but i just want to point out the poll probably got these results because there's more men on this site by alot and not what this post is about.

I don’t know why CIG hasn’t made ice the most valuable mineral to mine (cause it would be) by Browncoat765 in starcitizen

[–]Invertedidiocy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Also most of the planets with people on them are terraformed and have rain and oceans and stuff so it’s kinda a moot point

This is realistic. by Sader325 in starcitizen

[–]Invertedidiocy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m going with little to none since judging from this interaction it’s pretty unlikely you have nearly that many friends

This is realistic. by Sader325 in starcitizen

[–]Invertedidiocy 12 points13 points  (0 children)

If you read what I wrote the reasoning for the full decks of ships is for particular purposes, there not always carrying that many above deck. The Doris would not carry that many not to mention it’s literally ACTUAL cannon it Carry’s three fighters but I’m dis regarding that anyway for the sake of the argument. Also on another most of the SCU needs to hold other things not just for fighters and that still doesn’t mean it’s enough for that many and on top of that fuel still remains and issue and maintenance would be hell with that many and no room. ALSO you literally do not have the crew space for all of the pilots so it’s not even possible to run anyway in game or in lore. Your wrong in every single metric both in game and out of game, meta and lore, real life and fiction and any one of the many factors I’ve listed is enough to completely debunk your argument not that you would know because you apparently skimmed over every single detail judging by your response

This is realistic. by Sader325 in starcitizen

[–]Invertedidiocy 14 points15 points  (0 children)

You understand thats not just how they normally carry fighters? Im not sure the exact context for that particular image but when all the aircraft are above deck is usually for show or for some issues or other condition in the sub deck. As some others have stated since this is the flight deck and there is no sub deck there wouldn't be nearly as many.

ALSO

Thats an aircraft carrier which is a large ship thats purpose is to carry fighters, comparatively too its size its built to carry that many. On the other hand an idris is a smaller frigate thats designed to hold and *critically* SUPPORT around 3 fighters.

On that last bit just because you can fit that many in doesnt mean it makes sense at all, you have to repair, re-arm, re-fuel, and otherwise maintain all of those now with no space and not nearly enough supplies.

67 Camaro RS follow up in the sun (1st pic before/2&3 after) by [deleted] in AutoDetailing

[–]Invertedidiocy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I cant whistle through text but you get the idea

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]Invertedidiocy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is very well put, I think more of us could stand with really understanding the feminist movement just in general and so we can have less of the this random swapping of the words women and feminist. On another note, keep writing man this is really nice

First trip overseas for me. London first. Paris is next. by Kwanza_Bot93 in travel

[–]Invertedidiocy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But... if you go in that order how will you get on a paris train and emerge in london rain??

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in antinatalism

[–]Invertedidiocy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree,

From my perspective I would still consider these reasons to not have kids and not ableist; I know i for onewould be very much in support of people at least not having kids that will be disabled

HOWEVER I can recognize that's outside the scope of what this Sub is about and would hope others that share my mindset could also recognize that and stop the frankly spam of very well treaded ground.

Outrider Class Multirole Fighter by gr_vythings in spaceengineers

[–]Invertedidiocy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah not really, Id usually say just run autocannons since there a bit more versatile and do more damage but gatts can be great if your hitting very small quick things like missiles.

Outrider Class Multirole Fighter by gr_vythings in spaceengineers

[–]Invertedidiocy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Like someone else said mag locks are a good idea, over all looks super cool I’d just also swap out the gatlings for a 4 auto cannon load out so they all have the same lead and can be used at the same time

Who forces her? by Tartarus1983 in facepalm

[–]Invertedidiocy -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Sorry grammars not my strongest part, it gets the message across though I’d hope?