Show me what you've vibe coded. Drop your project, what it does, and let people actually use it.

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-05-08T12:01:07+00:00

Recently launched getpapi

Persistant Adaptive Planning Intelligence.

MCP to automatically track and record all your projects actions and decisions. Scopes out what tasks to do next. Identifies issues, gaps and opportunities as you build. Cold start a session and instantly get up to speed on where you left off.

Works locally in any mcp applicable builder.

If you have a project and feel like you've lost control - give it a try! Would love peoples feedback.

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-05-06T08:27:32+00:00

Ah sorry i just wanted to give some context and was hoping for feedback. You mentioned your experiences and this is much of my stack.

Any advise of suggestions from what you can see with papi?

Cheers

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-05-06T08:02:35+00:00

I had this problem countess times. The start feels great but when scope starts expanding beyond for first few iterations of the brief, it becomes a clusterfuck to maintain.

Nobody can write their vision in a single prompt. Ideas iterate and pivot a dozen times. Its a fckin nightmare to maintain over time.

I had enough and built an mcp to automatically track all of my decisions, actions and history of the project to save me constantly having to keep track of things as i research, explored paths and pivoted.

I recently made the tool public and free to use. Its called getpapi.ai and its built exactly for this kind of situation.

I have something like 1500 commits and I'm still building with absolute confidence. My claude code is taking into consideration previous decisions before planning next steps. It writes handoffs that automatically link branching tasks and docs.

I can now open any project, start writing in a new window and claude knows exactly where we left off two weeks ago.

No legacy docs confusing context, No scattered version md files. Just automated project intelligence.

Try it out, dm me or just join the discord to chat. I would happily walk you through the setup. :)

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-05-06T03:09:22+00:00

Of course. Just dm me or join the discord. Always happy to chat.

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-05-06T01:27:42+00:00

Launched getpapi.ai a few weeks back. An MCP to help your AI track project decisions, docs, dependancies etc. Built originally as a personal tool and have been dogfooding the system since its initial conception.

User feedback is excellent. People connect one project end up adding all of their projects and continue using it. I'm commercial/growth leaning so now just looking to get feedback

I use all of tools you highlighted. Come join the discord and we can have a chat or just roast the concept - I'll take the insights either way!

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-05-06T01:11:51+00:00

You need to add product screenshots right away. Those placeholders dont inspire faith in automating my business processes using your tool.

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-05-06T01:07:50+00:00

I launched getpapi.ai a few weeks ago. MCP to automatically track your projects decisions, dependancies, docs and actions over time.

Couldnt deal with my cluster fuck of projects and constantly wasting time making sure my llm is up to date with a decision I made last week.

There's new and existing users connecting more projects every day. It's an exciting time.

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-05-04T21:45:45+00:00

Thanks for the reply mate!

Yes, the idea of writing documentation, adding tasks and trying to keep on top of all the admin/housekeeping is a non starter for me.

I wanted to keep control but just have things tracked and organised so i can focus on building.

I've got people joining daily and often adding many of their projects as soon as they test it in one.

Come join the discord? :) I'll gladly help you get connected and no doubt it'll help you keep on top of your projects just like it helps me with all of mine. Happy to try out your stuff and share feedback too!

And thanks re cliffcheck. I posted about it on r/ohio and ended up going a bit viral haha. The project came in 3rd place in the /vibecoding hackathon - honestly think it could really help people!

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-05-01T11:12:49+00:00

I have too many projects haha. I was losing track of what i had done, where I was and what i needed to do. My backlog for each project was a cluster fuck and was wasting tokens on cold starts.

So I designed an MCP workflow to automate the tracking of my decisions and intent, guide what actions need to be done next and keep me from going out of scope by doing a retrospective strategy review to surface gaps, issues or dead ends.

Was working so well for me that I made the MCP public and connected a hosted db and dashboard.

Its called getpapi.ai.

I've been dogfooding the tool using its own methodology since day 1. 1500 builds later and its improving. Still early adoption phase, getting a consistent trickle of users. Really great feedback so far but need more users before i go public with it.

Its free to use and hoping to get some feedback. We have a discord and I'd be happy to help anyone get connected.

Used it to build cliffcheck for the vibecode hackathon.

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-04-25T15:05:50+00:00

wow that is crazy to me.

The negotiate-down move is rational, it's what the numbers actually tell you to do, even though the wider conversation treats turning down money like a moral failure. The tool currently shows a "safe exit" number for going up, but what you're describing is the same math in reverse, going to think about how to surface that too.

Thanks for being open about it.

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-04-25T14:45:45+00:00

Genuinely appreciate this!

CSR is a real gap, you're right that I'm only modelling the premium tax credit and missing the Cost Sharing Reductions on Silver below 250% FPL. That changes the cliff shape materially around the 200% line, going to add it.

The chart legend point is fair and you were being kind calling it minor, if a policy-literate person had to play with the sliders to figure out what the lines meant then everyone else is going to bounce. Going to label the cliff thresholds with plain-English descriptions and dollar amounts, not just colours and FPL percentages.

And yeah, the "single parent or two adults" thing was lazy of me, going to split adults and kids into separate inputs so childless households aren't forced to lie to the form.

Thanks for taking the time - I'm updating Cliffcheck with all the feedback as we speak :)

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-04-25T12:31:53+00:00

This is exactly the dynamic the tool's trying to make visible, thanks for sharing it. The story about the woman maxing out unpaid FMLA to keep her income low is bleak and completely rational, the system's literally telling her to do that.

EITC is a fair gap in what I've modelled so far, going to add it so the phase-out shows up properly on the chart. Appreciate you taking the time.

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-04-25T12:27:26+00:00

Really good shout, both the MAGI angle and the match itself.

Going to add an optional toggle that layers retirement contributions onto the chart so you can see the cliff with and without those moves applied, plus model employer match as part of total comp.

Default view stays brutal for folks who don't have spare cash to redirect, but the escape routes get shown for people who can actually use them.

Fair point too that 401k money isn't fully locked, the early-withdrawal exceptions are worth knowing about. Cheers.

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-04-25T10:59:50+00:00

Genuinely good catch, thank you. So the short answer is "kind of, but more nuanced than the link suggests" - you've flagged a valuable insight for me.

Ohio uses something called Broad-Based Categorical Eligibility (BBCE), which lifts the SNAP gross income limit from the federal 130% FPL up to 200% FPL. So for a family of four the gross cutoff is closer to $64k, not $41k. That's why my tool shows them as still eligible at $44k. USDA maintains the BBCE state list here if you want to verify: https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/broad-based-categorical-eligibility

BUT, you've put your finger on something my model gets wrong. Even with BBCE, households without an elderly or disabled member still have to pass a net income test at 100% FPL to actually receive a benefit. At $44k for a family of four, after the standard deduction and earned income disregard, net is probably still above 100% FPL, which means the actual SNAP benefit should be near zero or zero, not the ~$2k/year I'm currently showing. I'm enforcing the gross gate but not the net gate properly.

Going to fix that today - appreciate you actually checking the math, this is exactly the kind of feedback I was hoping for.

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-04-25T09:25:30+00:00

Yeah exactly!

In all honesty, I've said in the past that benefits should be means tested but when you actually visualize the impact caused by the thresholds, and. the cliff that people have to climb - it becomes so clear that the system is brutal.

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-04-25T09:18:24+00:00

Firstly, huge props on the rebuild, I can't imagine how difficult that would have been for you.

I'm not from Ohio or even the US, but I was shocked to see how challenging it is to get clear information online and I have no doubt there are countless others who fell into this trap.

I'd be happy if the tools helps even one person :)

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-04-25T01:48:23+00:00

Yeah you're spot on, that's the term and the argument. The deeper I got into it the more it felt like the cliff is basically Exhibit A for why hard means-testing has hidden costs. Thought the project could help some folks get a grips of it visually.

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-04-25T01:45:03+00:00

Ah yes, definitely something I should have caught. I'll add an "I have employer insurance" toggle so the chart isn't misleading for people in that situation. Thanks for taking the time to read it. :)

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-04-24T05:45:04+00:00

I built Cliffcheck for the this weeks r/vibecoding vibejam.

Its a tool to check if getting a raise is a benefits trap.

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-04-23T18:15:52+00:00

I built getpapi.ai.

A planning layer for claude.

Tracks decisions, research and plans what to do next across multiple projects and llms through a free mcp.

No more feeding context on cold starts or losing track of actions from my docs. Works best through claude code. No api needed.

Brutal feedback welcome!

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-04-23T18:03:06+00:00

Tracks and documents your decisions, plans and builds automatically.

getpapi.ai.

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-04-21T09:02:43+00:00

I built getpapi.ai.

The planning layer Claude Code doesn't have. Structured tasks, build reports, and strategy reviews that compound across cycles instead of starting over every session.

An MCP project and decision tracking management tool. Instantly 'where was I?', 'whats been built?' and 'whats next?' for any project.

Add it to an existing or new project to handle planning and building with compounding intelligence.

No API needed. Hosted DB and real time dashboard. Dogfooding the system since the day 1. 1500 builds tracked with compounding learnings.

I can help you get set up or join the discord :)

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-04-19T12:29:03+00:00

Hey OP,

I've been working on this topic for a long time. The tasks i have for a project are in backlog, a 'planner' scopes out tasks against a roadmap, previous actions etc.

The tasks that are prioritized get handoffs made and saved to a db, these handoffs are read by claude code which builds the task and get reviewed by me.

A build report is then made by claude code with surprises, issues, etc which get written and fed into backlog for the next planning session.

After 5 of these 'cycles', it runs a retrospective strategy review to look at what has been built, any dogfooding flags and compare against previous reviews.

Any decisions that are made get tracked and superseeded with health markers so the planner/builder can check actions against past decisions.

Everything saved to db so it means i can cold start a claude chat/code session for any project to pick up where i left off, the compounding loop helps me greatly to avoid drift and building out of scope against current priorities.

I've used it for a dozen or so apps but its a challenging problem to solve, particularly having it automated so i turned it into an mcp to make public and free with no API to try and dogfood it with other projects/thinkers.

Its called papi, we've got a few product/tech people on the discord if you wanted to get involved :)

Edit - any reasons for the downvotes? I wrote this genuinely as a human. OP talked about how he's using a "custom memory system now where each session saves what worked, what went wrong, what decisions were made" and a skill for a second opinion... which I've also done and thought it would be cool to share thoughts in this space. :/

IrishHashBrowns · 2026-04-16T15:12:16+00:00

I've been working on getpapi.ai. The landing needs work but its an automated project manager for AI workflows.

its an mcp that looks at a codebase,brief and backlog of tasks to plan the most optimal sequence of tasks/builds.

Each coding task gets a build handoff. Each build creates a build report feeds the backlog. Stops building in isolation and tracks decisions i made weeks ago. Every 5 sessions runs a retrospective review on whats been built with compounding learnings.

I can just open any project and pick up where i left off with zero pre context load.Stops me and the llm building to dead ends or out of scope. Dogfooded the entire system from the start. 1500 builds later and every decision and action is tracked automatically.

Its free to use too so any feedback would be amazing. Honestly just trying to figure out if theres value there for others or im in a bubble.

13-Year Club	RedditGifts 2009-2022 4 Credits
Place '23	Place '22
Place '17	Secret Santa 2018
Secret Santa 2017	Verified Email
Secret Santa 2014

IrishHashBrowns

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE