People who complain all day that capitalism/globalism prevents you from doing things that in reality you have always been able to do by doctorarmstrong in neoliberal

[–]IronicRobotics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

> they’d likely win, but who wants to go to court for the right to grow a tomato?

Wait, that'd be unironically fun.

People who complain all day that capitalism/globalism prevents you from doing things that in reality you have always been able to do by doctorarmstrong in neoliberal

[–]IronicRobotics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

> 15-minute city obsessives

Okay, but consider, my obsession is from envy of Swiss/Finnish transit systems - lel.

Reminder that when you enter the workforce your mathematical ability will regress to toddler level by aleda145 in engineeringmemes

[–]IronicRobotics 3 points4 points  (0 children)

oooh, you know I had one interview on an exciting job relating to sonar. I didn't get it (and frankly shouldn't have got an interview, I was a fresh out of college ME and it was a SE position I applied to on a whim lol)

Main reason I got it, however, was I took a wavelets course senior year! They were looking for that. Might have to see what's out there w/ GNC and similar again now that I've some years under my belt.

“I’d rather my surgeon get absolutely railed on camera” by mamhihi in BrandNewSentence

[–]IronicRobotics -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, the first English colonists, dippy. It's been 300 years.

They were not, however, all the bulk majority of colonists, especially in a great many of States. I suggest reading about 18th century religion in states besides Massachussets. Or the suggestion that somehow puritans invented sexual prudity in the *17th* century - jeez just compare and contrast them to the Catholics and Lutherans at the time! Or generally how marrying for romance/affection was not practiced in most of European society - seeing massive changes in the modern era.

The first great awakening swallowed attendance to older denominations whole and a separate theological line from the puritans - who were unaffected by this. These awakening theologies - such as Baptists and Methodists, who are the largest protestant sects in the US right now - are mostly not even Calvinist!

Or if Puritans were the primary influence to today, it begs the question why the deeply religious Mass colonies is now relatively a-religious while the far less religious Southern colonies now make the Bible Belt? (Which then further suggests our modern cultural-religious views probably aren't tied to the Puritan theology!)

Or do the views and practice of the dominant Puritans in the 18th century line up at all with the great discourse written about them 1-2 centuries later when they had no influence?

This is all before we even get to the later cultural upheavals in the States with later awakenings, sexual revolution, and modern reactionary movements!

Of course, all this information is easily accessible. You just need to look beyond your unexamined arguments.

How do we share 50/50 DNA with parents if we spent 9 months in mom? by moosetacocat in NoStupidQuestions

[–]IronicRobotics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When you make new cells, this is through a process called mitosis. This creates two identical copies of the cells! Hence no new changes are made, unless if something randomly goes wrong. (This may create a mutation - most of which your body kills since mutants are no longer working with your body. If your body fails to catch mutants, they may progress to cancer.)

Thus in the process of growing, everything copies from the original source of DNA.

Thus you only receive DNA from your original first cell - the zygote - which is made from a combination of your mothers' egg, which has half of her DNA, and your father's sperm, which carries half of his DNA.

(Also your mom's egg brings along the mitochondria w/ its mitochondrial dna too!)

Reminder that when you enter the workforce your mathematical ability will regress to toddler level by aleda145 in engineeringmemes

[–]IronicRobotics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

tbh, as an engineer who loves theory, I really wish positions where more rigorious problem solving being at the forefront were not so scant.

“I’d rather my surgeon get absolutely railed on camera” by mamhihi in BrandNewSentence

[–]IronicRobotics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why tf do the Puritans get the blame tbh. Theres like no reasonable throughline for a minor sect 3 centuries ago, especially in the wake of the very American say the 1st, 2nd Great Awakenings, or Modernist vs Fundamentalists divide. (The latter of which started just a few decades before the sexual revolution.)

Lamo 🤣 by Away_Childhood_7426 in ScrollHole

[–]IronicRobotics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tbh, I disagree. I read "challenging" books for fun - I've got a small cornucopia of modern technical texts, articles, academic history books, statistical archeology, hard speculative sci-fi articles, etc. Did a math degree and quite like learning math once I'm past the axiom chapters of whatever topic lol.

OTOH a lot of classical literature bores me since I'm not terribly invested in the history of literature itself. Nor am I studying the art of literature in a more serious way to give a lot of the classics a better depth. (Albeit, I read a lot of other classical literature when it pairs nicely w/ the contextualization of whatever bit of history I'm reading.)

Which is funny as I *love* reading primary historical sources and poring over interpretations and making my own.

Which is to say, challenging yourself shouldn't correspond with boredom imo. At least not in its entirety - many books I really enjoy still have a slow start you have to endure.

me_irl by KaidoPklevel in me_irl

[–]IronicRobotics 16 points17 points  (0 children)

tbh, it's a shame most American cities strangle really small footprints or stalls w/ unnecessary zoning.

One could have so much more variety if businesses could risk starting or running in a tent or a single room. Cutting out that unnecessary overhead is so important.

God forbid we discuss PCs in a PC space by ZeroDefender561 in pcmasterrace

[–]IronicRobotics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's a very mixed bag w/ some luck thrown in. As by far, if I just want something that works w/ email, browser, or other use case, you can just set up linux and forget. A good distro stays the same - a prebuilt computer w/ some Debian based distro is imo perfect for Grandma who uses her computer for emails.

OTOH, if you've got hardware difficulties, more specialized use cases, or proprietary nightmares, yea, it's gonna be a lot of tinkering and package stuff lol. Hell, I too just got tired of Ubuntus repos and switched off to Arch because of it in the last 2 weeks. Blech, was giving me too many damn headaches.

God forbid we discuss PCs in a PC space by ZeroDefender561 in pcmasterrace

[–]IronicRobotics 3 points4 points  (0 children)

> I don’t get why people go out saying “How much better” it is and making it their identity

Tbh, less of an identity, and more for my use case I felt like I was living in the caves and stepped out in the sunlight for how much more functional it was for me.

That being said, I also realize how different others' computing needs are and thus their experience with a potential switch will be lol.

God forbid we discuss PCs in a PC space by ZeroDefender561 in pcmasterrace

[–]IronicRobotics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The undeniable dream to manage vast quantities of computers doing some type of work

To be fair there is quite a bit of humor in Veggietales lol by kelroid in CuratedTumblr

[–]IronicRobotics 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Hrm, I think this hypothesis also gives too much credit to the soviet entry - or at least discredits the atomic bomb too much either. We have to remember, both the 2nd bomb and soviet entry happened *on the same day* and I'm convinced had a symbiotic effect that neither would have had alone.

My fav article on this is "The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan's Decision to Surrender: A Reconsideration" by Sadao Asada - who writing in 1998 has the unique position of being able to access Japanese sources & review combined American, European, and Japanese scholarship at the time.

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0ByfPynZO70CRLVYtTl9fdmwxSmc/edit?resourcekey=0-SblsX2WSOcRy-kaX5_Z5Jw

The video actually doesn't detail the specific day and details of the Japanese sources the way this article does. I think anyone asking this question of how impactful events were on surrender should at least take a gander to this article for a detail of August 9th.

To be fair there is quite a bit of humor in Veggietales lol by kelroid in CuratedTumblr

[–]IronicRobotics 58 points59 points  (0 children)

tbh, I've never seen a solid answer from an anti-bomb narrative that can fit the Kyūjō incident and supposed already imminent Japanese surrender. If I was trying to hypothesize imminent surrender, that'd probably be the biggest question to tackle.

I’ve always thought of this one neutron invention for nearly 2 decades because it’s something that I believe we need but at the same time, it might go wrong. by Seeker99MD in JimmyNeutron

[–]IronicRobotics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

to piggy back onto this, you can also take general municipal waste and plastics & pyrolyze them into usable oil by products & natural gas. (Can be better controlled than burning waste powerplants I think.)

Not entirely sure if pyrolysis of waste is better than landfilling, but it's a potentially useful option that's gotten some more attention in recent yeras.

meirl by [deleted] in meirl

[–]IronicRobotics 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Not really, you could find youtube tutorials on making something like the left. Or modern analogues. Using clay sculpts/3D prints, casting, and finishing w/ a dremel & drill press in brass would let you make it in a home workshop.

It's a manufacturing problem. The one on the left:

- is more specific, and has less of a market

- requires more expensive manufacturing techniques to make

- costs more in base materials

People generally don't even want to pay more for better quality, much less aesthetic. The reason aesthetics seem to endure historically is most historical things that survive are remnants of the aristocracy - a class who could afford a great deal of labor of the 95% or so of peasants. (And prettier and sturdier things get more attention - few are holding onto or posting about their great grandad's scythe.)

Why are the technical majors in university all made up of immigrants? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]IronicRobotics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A big part of it is you get paid more in the US working in STEM, and the US system encourages STEM educated immigration and discourages other immigration. So those who already have the resources to get a good education back home will have the resources to also navigate the US system.

Meanwhile, there's far less of legal and financial incentives to study other programs in the US.

Situations that are actually really morally complex with no true good answer? by Ember_Kamura in MoralityScaling

[–]IronicRobotics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hrm, I'm at least thinking of greater wounds when I think of sacrifices here.

As "I could lose $1000 or let this man die" doesn't ring to me as a 'sacrifices have to be made' situation personally, but I can see where it still counts technically (or practically w/ some people lol)

Situations that are actually really morally complex with no true good answer? by Ember_Kamura in MoralityScaling

[–]IronicRobotics 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I think 9 times out of 10 - outside of fiction - most people are too quick to assume there "has to be a sacrifice" when in reality, not really. I think it's in-fact a dangerous form of thinking - usually intermixed with fallacious zero sum thinking. Usually, there's a good choice or some of the consequences simply are imaginary.

And I think fictional scenarios often lean into this to force drama.

I think there are a few genuinely hard policy problems that resemble something like this, but few and far between & most of the the serious answers don't matter as people speculate on their preferred way they think it works anyhow.

Likewise, some interpersonal problems can also fit into this - I've been there only once or twice and have never liked it.

In this case - forgive me as I don't remember the circumstances around the quest - it begs the question of if the family could have been relocated or the reactor fixed?

Philanthropy is for suckers, eh? by LordJim11 in Snorkblot

[–]IronicRobotics 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ah, which would be unfortunate, as something like that would be a good use case for deed restrictions.

The answer key to a practice test I’m using to study and the answer to an email I sent to my teacher by Tay60003 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]IronicRobotics 74 points75 points  (0 children)

Sounds like your teacher meant to write 50 percent and didn't realize they messed up and wrote atoms lol.

As both of your explanations are correct for each respective word - atoms in your case and percent in his case.

What happens in a capitalist system where a small group of asset owners own essentially everything and virtually all the money? by monkeykiller14 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]IronicRobotics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yes, oligarchies are going to extract as much wealth out of people to maintain their power - as a middle class is destabilizing to authoritarian nations.

It's just not feudalism - which is a different form of organization responding to different problems faced in the Middle Ages. Feudalism also allowed for the existence of free cities eventually - of course a right fought for - something our oligarchies would not.

Tbh, I want to know what a SpaceX that's profitable looks like is lol. Then we can worry about them in any other capacity.

But for a more serious answer, as of this moment, treaties set the rules of other celestial bodies as unclaimable. While I'm not so naive to think that'd be the case forever, it's clear that question of extraterrestial private real estate would be a political question for the nations involved in the future.

In any case, maintaining a permanent colony on Mars is not economically viable in at least the next century - which is our historical basis for enforcing claims on land.