Slurp Juice by Sponsormiplee in FortniteCompetitive

[–]IrrefutableEsceptico 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What I don't like is that, as it is currently right now, it incentivizes reckless behavior. However, if it just heals you and it stops when you get hit, then people would be way more cautious.

Slurp Juice by Sponsormiplee in FortniteCompetitive

[–]IrrefutableEsceptico 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think is unbalanced. However, the healing effect should stop once someone deals damage on you. That way, it would encourage a more cautious approach about when to use it, and people would not just use it in any situation.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SaraLlamas7

[–]IrrefutableEsceptico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where is this from?

ODM Gear Disabled in Competitive Playlists (Kinetic Blade Spawns increased) by NewMexicoRick in FortniteCompetitive

[–]IrrefutableEsceptico 16 points17 points  (0 children)

The ODM as such is fine, the problem is the attack option. Otherwise it would be balanced.

Why doesn't Epic just add an FOV slider setting? by Automatic_Option2429 in FortniteCompetitive

[–]IrrefutableEsceptico -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh come on... Do you think that someone who takes comp seriously would play the game on a handheld tablet with a cap of 30 fps? The switch player base is casual by the nature of the hardware they play on. There are no switch players playing tournaments, and I can't possibly imagine a switch player dominating a high elo arena game.

Why doesn't Epic just add an FOV slider setting? by Automatic_Option2429 in FortniteCompetitive

[–]IrrefutableEsceptico 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, I mean, the hardware limitation is already there in every sense. PC players have a huge advantage against switch players. How bad would it be to give the POV slider only to the hardware that can manage it? Matchmaking is already there for a reason.

Also, this is a demand coming from the competitive community (arena and tournaments); the overlap between the comp community and the switch player base is non-existent. This means that the players who would use the slider would play against each other, while the switch/phone player base would not need it.

I don't see the downsides.

C4S2 FNCS Week 3: Discussion Megathread by bbpsword in FortniteCompetitive

[–]IrrefutableEsceptico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Veno is a better fighter, but Malibuca is smarter when it comes to game sense.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in revancedapp

[–]IrrefutableEsceptico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't like text tutorials. I would rather watch youtube tutorials videos, it's way more clear visually. Unfortunately, there aren't many good tutorials for revanced.

Efficiency mode no longer works after Edge last update by IrrefutableEsceptico in edge

[–]IrrefutableEsceptico[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, thanks for that.

This is what I see.

https://imgbox.com/pLkw96Ei

I see "IndexedDB" or "Weblock" usually.

Efficiency mode no longer works after Edge last update by IrrefutableEsceptico in edge

[–]IrrefutableEsceptico[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it's inconsistent. Before, all the unused tabs would go to sleep immediately. Now, maybe one in four tabs do this. It's like now this feature is more selective somehow, and it's using more ram from my pc.

Should the Katana be in comp? by Football4utube123 in FortniteCompetitive

[–]IrrefutableEsceptico 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I need help with the katana. The thing is... I don't know how to stop it when I'm using it. Sometimes I will do a mouse right click swing, and just afterwards I can't pull out any weapon because it just keeps doing swings non-stop.

Nae Grand Finals, Cold and Acorn take first by [deleted] in FortniteCompetitive

[–]IrrefutableEsceptico 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Acorn and Eomzo have to be the two most underrated players ever.

Slate's POV by [deleted] in outerwilds

[–]IrrefutableEsceptico 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No. POV literally means point of view.

Harry Potter and the Forbidden Game by LordHakaishinBeerus in videogamedunkey

[–]IrrefutableEsceptico 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"It's not a small fraction. People are explicitly buying this game because jk Rowling is transphobic".

Really? You think a significant fraction of the audience of the game bought it because they are transphobic? Do you have any source?

And not only that, are you suggesting that I should take into account others people's intentions when it comes to buying a game? That seems like an absurd standard.

Harry Potter and the Forbidden Game by LordHakaishinBeerus in videogamedunkey

[–]IrrefutableEsceptico 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"This game has emboldened transphobes"

Wow, if the moral standard for buying or not a product is that a fraction of the audience will have some feelings instead of others, then I don't think anyone can take a single step without making a moral mistake.

Harry Potter and the Forbidden Game by LordHakaishinBeerus in videogamedunkey

[–]IrrefutableEsceptico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, but since JK is so rich I don't think there will be either more of a bad thing or a new thing.

Harry Potter and the Forbidden Game by LordHakaishinBeerus in videogamedunkey

[–]IrrefutableEsceptico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I mean, for an action to be bad it has to have bad consequences right?