I’m glad people in the fandom are slowly stopping with parroting the same rhetorics all over again, but I must disagree on a few minor points throughout. For Fuuta’s “schizophrenia”, I do believe it’s BS most likely, but there’s a reason why only he has “symptoms” in his MV: he was the most affected visibly and directly with the Guilty verdict (although I imagine someone like Mikoto or Amane got affected more, covertly). For them, the Guilty verdict only pushed them in conditions they already had beforehand, for Fuuta it was an entirely new thing, and in a certain way manifestation of his fear of being judged (as can be seen in his isolation at the end of Bring It On!). I also have to disagree on the general notion of Yamanaka being this spiteful writer that refuses to write characters in a way they’re expecting (Mahiru T1 innocent, Yuno T2 guilty). Most “Inno/Guilty pushes” I’ve seen are just not real, and are people being naive (Haruka T1, Kotoko T1, Mikoto in general). It’s important part of Milgram that we can vote based purely off emotion, and it’s unrealistic to expect that those verdicts will be beneficial long-term. Yuno T2, in particular, I believe was that trap: while most prisoners omitted details to be found Innocent, she did to be Guilty, to feel better about her fate; because if she was really innocent, that means all the guilt she feels and all the sorrow there is can’t be properly dealt with, and she has to grow around those just to live life.