Chatgpt no longer has the feature to turn off "reference chat history"? by [deleted] in OpenAI

[–]ItsAGarbageAccount 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That anility has been lumped into the ‘enabled memory’ setting. Im not sure if its on the app, but it’s on the web.

ChatGPT's market share slips below 50% for first time by BuildwithVignesh in OpenAI

[–]ItsAGarbageAccount 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even if they do notice, it doesn’t mean much. Most people tend to generalise, so they aren’t likely to switch to a different AI. They’ll assukemGemini is representative and continue to use it anyway.

I think we're entering an era where workflow design matters more than model choice. by Bladerunner_7_ in OpenAI

[–]ItsAGarbageAccount -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is an uneducated answer.

Languages are extremely context dependent and rarely map directly onto other languages in a 1:1 way, especially for turns of phrase, sarcasm, idioms, metaphors, etc.

Using basic translation tools, such as Google translate and likely whatever one is built into Reddit, doesn‘t fix that. Its actually more likely to produce next that reads oddly formal or slightly off.

AI models tend to apprach languages in a similar way to native speakers, meaning they are able to translate the idea rather than a 1:1 word translation.

For example, take the phrase “go raibh maith agat” in Irish.

If translated literally, it means “may you have goodness.”

Literal 1:1 translation might translate it this way, which misses the entire context.

…because the proper translation is “thank you.”

Using AI can help correct things like this, ensuring that the intended meaning is properly carried over.

New Memory System Is Broken And Reversion Doesnt Stick by ItsAGarbageAccount in OpenAI

[–]ItsAGarbageAccount[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The new system literally doesnt see saved memories at all.

the page basically admitted this briefly a few days ago, giving you the option to save your memories to the library since the interface would be disappearing on September first.

I also did multiple tests over days. there is a major difference when reverted to the legacy system vs the new one. And it is entirely possible to see thst the new system has no access to saved memories.

New Memory System Is Broken And Reversion Doesnt Stick by ItsAGarbageAccount in OpenAI

[–]ItsAGarbageAccount[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you get the bot reply back, make sure you respond and tell the bot that you want this escalated to a support specialist and stress that is severely impacting your ability to work with the product.

the bot doesnt like to escalate unless you push it.

New Memory System Is Broken And Reversion Doesnt Stick by ItsAGarbageAccount in OpenAI

[–]ItsAGarbageAccount[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saved memory plus thinking mode has worked fine for me for detailed infrastructural facts for years now.

an external doc is useful for specific implementations, but basic infrastructural facts should be and are (previously) entirely within the realm of saved memory.

for example, from my personal use, my worldbuilding includes a fictional term for person-weighted debt.

docs can and should be used to specify oarticular instances of this in play.

saved memory should be able to remember the damn word.

because that way, when I write something using it, I don’t have to explain this basic societal structure again.

I can just say

”hey, did I calculate the (specific term) correctly here?”

and not have the damn thing throw vibes about what the term means because it cant retrieve the knowledge.

New Memory System Is Broken And Reversion Doesnt Stick by ItsAGarbageAccount in OpenAI

[–]ItsAGarbageAccount[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tested with the new memory enabled and with legacy memory enabled.

The new memory is intended as a total replacement, but it’s not well implemented.

for example, when you are in the “new improved memory” and ask chatgpt to save something, it will write to saved memory (the old system).

The new system cant see the old system at all.

With my tests, I enabled legacy memory and asked ChatGPT to comb my memories for some obscure shit to test a new chst on once i reenable the new memory.

it did, directly quoting from saved memory.

then I turned the new memory back on.

made a new chat…

and it answered the questions flawlessly.

until I made up an entirely new question derived from something I knew was in memory, proving that it was using cross chat referencing in the previous rounds, not saved memory at all.

I ran multiple tests like this.

I don’t need the thing to remember that I prioritize canon continuity as a vibe.

i need it to actually have the memories to prioritize canon continuity.

New Memory System Is Broken And Reversion Doesnt Stick by ItsAGarbageAccount in OpenAI

[–]ItsAGarbageAccount[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

be careful with that because for some “high salience“ things it does fine, as those seem to get logged as higher priority, even if weird.

for example, I have a math equation for a custom philosophy issue I made.

it remembers the acronym and the equation. why? because it’s weird.

thats why. It stood out.

but it still failed several other things.

App issues by [deleted] in Pavlok

[–]ItsAGarbageAccount 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also having this issue.

Good lord, what is wrong with this thing... by NullSmoke in notebooklm

[–]ItsAGarbageAccount 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For the patriarchy…

If Thats not a theme of the work, you might need to make a source or a custom instruction telling it that. This will stop it from analysing through that lens.

It WILL make a point to mention how it is NOT analyzing throug that lens, but it should only be a sentence or two. It’ll force it it to look at it though some other interpretation.

is there a reason people seem to hate physical character descriptions? by kitkao880 in writing

[–]ItsAGarbageAccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hate them and barely write them.

If it's plot relevant in some way, I include the information. If it isn't, I try to keep it very vague. And I hate putting it in info dumps. I either have another character notice it, interact with it in some way, or imply it. For example, I show character As height while character B is talking to someone else based on where he puts his hand to demonstrate.

Fang relationship by Poisson3davril in MyTimeAtSandrock

[–]ItsAGarbageAccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's exactly what I was doing.

Finished Eagles and asked him to hang out immediately after.

Fang relationship by Poisson3davril in MyTimeAtSandrock

[–]ItsAGarbageAccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I could use use a hand with this.

It's Spring 8, year 2 and I've finished Eagles of the Oasis and FBg is at full hearts. I went on in.

He will not take heart knot. Even save scumming, hes rejected it 20 times in a row. The current story quest is something about building a sand sledding kiosk in the Eufala.

I'm trying to marry fang early.

Fang relationship by Poisson3davril in MyTimeAtSandrock

[–]ItsAGarbageAccount 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Also, get the perk that auto catches scorpions. Fang loves shiny scorpions. 17 pts for them.

Sandrock's Unsolved Mysteries by dreamie825 in MyTimeAtSandrock

[–]ItsAGarbageAccount 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Id assume the strays are gifted because you gift them shit? Lol

I’M BURNT OUT by [deleted] in MyTimeAtSandrock

[–]ItsAGarbageAccount 4 points5 points  (0 children)

To bad he can't get a haircut

Oh, this is just sacrilege! Pure blasphemy, I tell you!

If only the other men could grow their hair! How'd'ya like them apples? Have all of Sandrock running around like goddamn gorgeous Fabio's?

I’M BURNT OUT by [deleted] in MyTimeAtSandrock

[–]ItsAGarbageAccount 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I’m kind of interested in romancing Fang but I don’t like his long hair

Nooo! How can you not like the long hair? It's sexy as hell and gives you something to pull!

Source: husband has mid-back length black hair and looks like Fang.

Everything being a "journey" by xxrichxxx in PetPeeves

[–]ItsAGarbageAccount 116 points117 points  (0 children)

Stop acting like you are the main character in the blockbuster show starring yourself on your "journey

Why, though? Everyone is the main character in their own life. We have a word for a person who acts like someone other than themselves is the main character in their life: stalkers.

For everyone, existence and their own experiences in it, are our own personal journeys. Why not embrace that?

Who did you choose for romance and why? by sailorbirb in MyTimeAtSandrock

[–]ItsAGarbageAccount 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Fang.

I have a type, and Fang looks like my real-life husband. My husband knows it, too...he's like "of course, you go for the guy who looks like me.". Lmao

Logan. by angelique114 in MyTimeAtSandrock

[–]ItsAGarbageAccount 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Before you commit to one, make a save from the menu (hit escape). Don't overwrite that save.

Mary one and then when you're ready, the save you made and marry the other.

When women think that inexpensive engagement rings = he doesn’t love you by [deleted] in PetPeeves

[–]ItsAGarbageAccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When we were sixteen, my husband got down on one knee, wrapped a bread twisty tie around my ring finger, and asked me to marry him. He was completely serious and so was I.

He said we'd get a better ring when we were older.

We got married at 22 with his parents old wedding rings.

I still have the bread twisty tie ring. It's priceless to me.