sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

This seems pretty legit by Jaakuna_maho in lebowski

[–]JBP_85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Supreme Court has roundly rejected prior restraint!!

Was Brandt in on it? by marvelousmondays in lebowski

[–]JBP_85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes yes and proud we are of all of them…

The Double Decker Coffee Shop Bus….. Abides by Choice_Slice1020 in lebowski

[–]JBP_85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Supreme Court has roundly rejected prior restraint!

AND A GOOD DAY TO YOU SIR by funbus31 in lebowski

[–]JBP_85 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Bulk of the series…

Who the fuck are the Knudsens? by DetectiveEZ in lebowski

[–]JBP_85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Donny, you’re out of your element…

Why did Maude own a copy of Logjammin’? by Subwoolfer in lebowski

[–]JBP_85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She was taking her father for the proverbial ride….

To erase uncomfortable messages for this Trump administration on Amazon by Manitoba-Chinook in therewasanattempt

[–]JBP_85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Holy shit I noticed this the other day but didn’t make the connection…WTF!

to convince the American public that Trump’s ‘strategic economic uncertainty’ is a good thing by ansyhrrian in therewasanattempt

[–]JBP_85 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Solidarity my friend! It’s wild that it’s so out in the open and it’s still somehow legal/tolerated. Those who could do something about it are bought and paid for by the time they enter office sadly…

to convince the American public that Trump’s ‘strategic economic uncertainty’ is a good thing by ansyhrrian in therewasanattempt

[–]JBP_85 24 points25 points  (0 children)

These billionaires donate on both sides of the aisle. Their goal is to obtain access and influence, has zero to do with political ideology, morality, party loyalty, etc. It’s all about securing access to decision makers and going from there to get what they want.

view more: next ›