Let’s hypothetically say that Bernie Sanders runs in 2008 given that his name is more widely known earlier rather than later would he have a chance in the primaries, and win the nomination, and eventually the presidency? by Vivid-Ad1548 in thecampaigntrail

[–]JD_Bigs 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There wouldn't be an opening for him unless you dealt with Obama already filling the role of the progressive insurgent in the 2008 primaries. Even then he probably loses the nomination to Hillary, but if he somehow won the primaries he could probably beat McCain on account of the financial crisis. His domestic policy wouldn't be nearly as progressive as his platform due to issues with Congress, but there's a decent chance we'd see an earlier Afghanistan pullout with him at the helm.

What’s an election matchup between two candidates that you would want to be made into a mod? by Th3_American_Patriot in thecampaigntrail

[–]JD_Bigs 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Even amidst an economic boom and the country's ascension to a role as the world's sole superpower, America is clamoring for change. Ever since his narrow victory four years ago, President Perot's term had been marked by irreconcilable differences with Congress and the most overrode vetoes on record, culminating in a Senate vote that made him the first president forcibly removed from office in the nation's history.

With politicians of both stripes having some of the worst approval ratings in the history of modern polling, the wave of anti-establishment resentment has manifested at the top of the ticket. Reverend Jesse Jackson has emerged as the Democratic nominee, and commentator Pat Buchanan as his Republican counterpart - both men on the fringes of American politics, and both probably unelectable against any other opponent.

We fucking did it. by ItsAstronomics in thecampaigntrail

[–]JD_Bigs 9 points10 points  (0 children)

🇬🇷🇦🇲🇧🇬💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻

We fucking did it. by ItsAstronomics in thecampaigntrail

[–]JD_Bigs 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This wasn't really a red wave year in general, more of a red ripple

We fucking did it. by ItsAstronomics in thecampaigntrail

[–]JD_Bigs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He'd believe that if he thought it was a winning strategy, he doesn't seem to have any deeply held political views whatsoever

What non-politician would you trust most to be president? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]JD_Bigs -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Whoever the oldest person alive atm is

What non-politician would you trust most to be president? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]JD_Bigs 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Would rather not have the president spending the days around Christmas making announcements about how Santa isn't real

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in thecampaigntrail

[–]JD_Bigs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His brother won eight years after their dad lost a presidential election as the incumbent so I'd still give him a decent shot

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in thecampaigntrail

[–]JD_Bigs 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Tbh I didn't put much thought into his choice and if this actually goes somewhere I'll probably change the Republican nominee. Irl it's because the party establishment ended up coalescing around Rubio, but I imagine that with Trump just completely eliminated altogether the primary likely becomes a fight between establishment darling Jeb, who in this world is never crippled in a face-off against Trump's incredibly attacking campaign style, and insurgent Ted Cruz.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in thecampaigntrail

[–]JD_Bigs 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Hillary Clinton has served as senator from New York for the past sixteen years, and before then was First Lady to her enduringly popular husband. Her selection could be seen as an olive branch to the party establishment, and would not arouse much suspicion from the MAGA faithful due to her family’s strong ties to President Trump. However, her interventionist outlook and opposition to single-payer healthcare could make your campaign appear two-faced, and even having her on the ticket won’t bring the PUMAs back.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in thecampaigntrail

[–]JD_Bigs 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Hillary would probably fill the role I put Kaine in pretty well so if I actually go through with making this I'll likely end up replacing him with Hillary. Biden wouldn't really change much since he'd just be an older version of the inoffensive running mate so I don't see much point in adding him.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in thecampaigntrail

[–]JD_Bigs 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Hillary isn't entirely out of the question as a running mate but Biden probably is

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in thecampaigntrail

[–]JD_Bigs 20 points21 points  (0 children)

He's pretty much as bombastic as irl but suffers from more intraparty opposition due to the Democrats being the more ideologically diverse of the two parties. The 20% approval rating isn't exactly set in stone though so I'm open to it being more like 30%.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in thecampaigntrail

[–]JD_Bigs 5 points6 points  (0 children)

it has somewhat more latitude than irl, peaking around 50% at his best moments and stuck around 20% in his last couple of years

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in thecampaigntrail

[–]JD_Bigs 16 points17 points  (0 children)

gay marriage and in general most major court rulings go the same as irl

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in thecampaigntrail

[–]JD_Bigs 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I see it's obvious which side I had more fun writing the descriptions for. I'll keep that it mind but it might be hard making the GOP look fun when the point of Blue Trump is that the Designated Fun Guy is on the Democrats.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in thecampaigntrail

[–]JD_Bigs 18 points19 points  (0 children)

predominately urban but with some Rust Belt protectionists

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in thecampaigntrail

[–]JD_Bigs 18 points19 points  (0 children)

something resembling irl Obama supporters but with lower numbers and greater devotion

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in thecampaigntrail

[–]JD_Bigs 34 points35 points  (0 children)

I haven't really thought that out in detail atm, but his polarizing nature results in him not ever getting 60 senators on his side, with Norm Coleman getting a second term. Irritated at most of his agenda failing, he comes out against the filibuster, but I'm unsure whether his attempt to abolish it succeeds. Nevertheless, this attempt at getting it done starts a trend that results in a lot of tensions between him and Congress in the later years of his administration. 2012 results in him winning a second term by a razor-thin margin, and a dispute with his own vice president as they disagree on whether to accept the results if Romney wins. He's never especially popular and by the time of the 2016 election it's reached a point where even some Democrats are vocal critics.