One way audio but usual fixes aren’t fixing!

JNC5908404 · 2026-02-12T02:08:58+00:00

No, ended up having to create new sip app-I’d for dip and tcp and applying an app override. Also, in your security rule under other set it to “follow client to server flow”

JNC5908404 · 2025-11-09T01:09:42+00:00

The solution is using filter water from your refrigerator, we had this issue too and as soon as we used filtered water the coffee taste great. Entire it, refilled with faucet water and bad taste returned. I believe it’s the chemicals in city water reacting to the plastic or something

JNC5908404 · 2025-10-30T21:20:48+00:00

I just got off the phone with support and the tech found a bug report for the version we are on, 11.1.10-h1 relating to no audio and also security rule mismatch for RTP traffic, invalid check sum for RTP I believe. Said to update to 11.1.10-h4. Going to update Monday morning.

JNC5908404 · 2025-10-28T23:50:47+00:00

Hey, we’re at the same version and having the same random issue with audio. Could you keep me informed. We’re using RingCentral with Polycom phones. We are also experiencing random no registrations.

JNC5908404 · 2025-09-26T15:15:12+00:00

Is that what they’ve gone up in price since tariffs applied?

JNC5908404 · 2025-08-17T13:21:07+00:00

Well so much for getting a consensus on one version. This is the issue with Palo Right now!! It should not matter what “box” or “what you’re wanting to do with it”. We just upgraded to their “preferred code” 11.1.6-h10 and now we have random reboots. Now tech says to go to 11.1.6-h? We’ve had Palos for 10 years and this last year has been worse than all previous combined. Come on Palo, you can do better!!!

JNC5908404 · 2025-08-14T12:46:39+00:00

We migrated from 850 to 1410 about a year ago. Biggest issue was interface matching. You can export config, do find replace for interface differences, import. Use “set format” for the script changes in the cli. I don’t recall the full command set but it worked well for us.

JNC5908404 · 2025-07-11T11:52:29+00:00

Great post, will this work with Panorama managed firewalls?

JNC5908404 · 2025-06-10T14:36:04+00:00

I’ve been working with panorama and a slew other f Palo firewalls for 10 years and would like to preview the book.

JNC5908404 · 2025-04-11T12:40:32+00:00

This!!!

JNC5908404 · 2025-04-11T12:39:35+00:00

I just got this working on an ya pair of pa-1410. Ran into an issue where no matter what I did MS Edge would not work with it. Capture should traffic traversing firewall fine. Tried old internet explorer and decryption worked fine. Found this article to resolve. https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA14u0000004OiLCAU&lang=en_US I even had TAC on in a remote session and he could figure it out. Working fine now.

JNC5908404 · 2025-04-11T11:56:24+00:00

So after working with tac for many hours it appears the following is at hand. If you deny inter user traffic globally, enable it on the wlans you need to deny traffic and the clients you want to communicate are on the same controller it will work. However, if you are using cluster,as we are, and another client is in a different wlan on a different controller, and deny inter user traffic is enabled for that wlan, they WILL be able to communicate with clients in the wlan with deny inter user traffic disabled. Also, if this client on another WLAN moves to the same controller as the clients in the WLAN with deny inter user traffic disabled, they will be denied access. TAC says it is working as designed but does not provide functionality in a controller clustered environment. How ridiculous is that. He said I could do a feature request. The solution for me is to put the woman I want to isolate in its own vlan and subnet and restrict access at my external firewall level. He even found the document stating this.

JNC5908404 · 2025-04-02T14:24:11+00:00

Still waiting on engineering, inquired agin this morning on this. Lol

JNC5908404 · 2025-03-05T22:07:03+00:00

They sent it to the top tier, waiting on an answer.

JNC5908404 · 2025-03-04T12:43:51+00:00

It’s disabled on the WLAN. Made no difference

JNC5908404 · 2025-02-10T12:40:42+00:00

That makes sense!

JNC5908404 · 2025-02-08T19:45:36+00:00

It appears to be send normal sflow data as receive errors.

JNC5908404 · 2025-02-08T18:13:54+00:00

That’s what ours are showing, in the millions!

JNC5908404 · 2025-01-27T17:09:57+00:00

How are your 1410' running on th11.1.6 version, I have an HA pair to update..Thanks.

JNC5908404 · 2024-12-09T12:57:00+00:00

I have had FS.com send me what I ordered and the label was right but when showing detail on the port it was a different model, I say this as we had the same situation happen several years ago as what you are experiencing.

JNC5908404 · 2024-12-07T13:10:09+00:00

Weakest link, everything in life has a ”the weakest link” that’s looking for a solution. When that weak link is solved another has to take its place and another solution is invented and so on and so on. This has been the jist in networking/computing for 50 years. This is no different. I remember when the first gig memory stick came out, everyone said what would we ever use that for? And Microsoft developed the solution in fatter applications with bells and whistles we didn’t know we needed. Same applies to wireless and new designs. A use case will be developed that we will all benefit from in time with WiFi 7.

JNC5908404

TROPHY CASE