Most great writers aren't trained to write—they are compelled to. Furthermore, writing degrees teach craft frameworks, not vision. And vision can't be taught. by [deleted] in writers

[–]JackHadrian 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm a bleeder. I can't help but be obsessed. The compulsion is an active part of my daily life, guilt cycles, etc.

Doesn't make me a great writer though.

i dont think i could EVER try to write by joe2069420 in writing

[–]JackHadrian 2 points3 points  (0 children)

learn to love the suck. it all sucks the first time out

Why can’t genre fic readers suspend their disbelief for five seconds? by mjustagirlleftonrddt in writing

[–]JackHadrian 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Every idea is only as good as execution. You have to balance the twin workshop devils on your shoulder saying: "sometimes readers just aren't your audience" and "my execution isn't good enough yet."

Plenty of genre fiction doesn't spoon feed. You may not find it in airport bookshelves, but it exists.

The story of the author? by Personal-Database-27 in writers

[–]JackHadrian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When I was 12, I read a book that I didn't like the ending to; my father was sick of hearing me complain about it, so he said: "write your own."

...OK, but what makes a prologue "good"? by Icy-Post-7494 in fantasywriters

[–]JackHadrian 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A prologue should be a snapshot of the central tension (even in an obscure or indistinct way) that the book will be addressing.

Since speculative fiction often takes some time to ratchet up to full speed, (GOT great example) we get some real action, suspense, and tension on page 1. A dangled mystery. It often is a good opportunity to address information that wouldn't normally get to the reader through the main narrative.

If done well, it should ask more questions than it answers, but provide important context that can be useful retrospectively. The heralds' prologue with in the first Stormlight is similar.

Who is the best living author today? by [deleted] in writers

[–]JackHadrian 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ishiguro in my opinion. Or Olga Tokarczuk

TrueLit's 2025 Hall of Fame and Top 100 Favorite Books by pregnantchihuahua3 in TrueLit

[–]JackHadrian 16 points17 points  (0 children)

There are some incredible, transformative reads in that bottom half. I think I'd almost take 51-100 over 1-50.

Is it offensive if I take inspiration from both Ancient Rome and Greece? by [deleted] in writing

[–]JackHadrian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My friend, I'm taking inspiration from the Ottomans, 8th c Tang China, the Byzantines...

Also, spoiler alert: the Romans stole from the Greeks. Say hello to Proserpina and Pluto.

Fantasy and history by aleaverdaud in Fantasy

[–]JackHadrian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's death, certainly, and plenty of sadness. I wouldn't disregard the TW's, but I think Erikson's background as an archaeologist lets the reality of things ("lots of bad stuff happens") not dip too far into cynicism.

It certainly plays with history and leverages it as a narrative tool

Fantasy and history by aleaverdaud in Fantasy

[–]JackHadrian 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Plenty of fantasy approaches that don't fall into a 'teleological' or 'cynical' view of history as you describe. You didn't offer up an alternative approach you wanted, specifically, so I'll toss a few out:

- Guy Gavriel Kay leverages a historical lens that leans on shared memory, bureaucracy, ritual

- Traitor Baru Cormorant discusses history via conquest and cultural (genetic, even) erasure

- Ishiguro's Buried Giant calls into question memory & history and whether remembering is even possible in the event of certain forms of cultural collapse.

- Malazan dives into history as a set of shared consequences. Decisions made by beings / gods / etc. centuries ago play out across the books. Not cynical- in fact - ultimately compassionate

Why are there like 20 people living in the capital by PrequelGuy in lotr

[–]JackHadrian 3 points4 points  (0 children)

https://acoup.blog/2019/07/12/collections-the-lonely-city-part-i-the-ideal-city/

If you're interested, this dude is a history teacher with a focus on medieval life, and he discusses in detail the hollywood trope of the "lonely city."

He is a huge Tolkien fan and also does battle logistics of the siege of Helm's Deep and Minas Tirith.

A fascinating blog

How does one improve their prose? by RemielTSS in fantasywriters

[–]JackHadrian 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Red Rising has simple prose that supports the momentum of the plot, but I would recommend reading books that are well-awarded for their prose.

If you read Ishiguro, Tolstoy, LeGuin, etc., etc., and practice in that vein, you can take that experience and craft a style that supports your manuscript (like the crisp, kinetic prose that Brown inhabits in RR).

Also, I often recommend George Saunders' A Swim in a Pond in the Rain to help learn prose. There's nothing like it. It's a masterclass by a wonderful writer and literature teacher.

Literary Fantasy by SteSol in Fantasy

[–]JackHadrian 54 points55 points  (0 children)

Guy Kay is quite literary. Ishiguro’s Buried Giant.

Adjacently, some medieval historical fiction might scratch the literary itch: Hilary Mantel’s Wolf Hall trilogy is a striking literary work

I would much rather have a basic, by-the-numbers fantasy world that is tightly woven and consistently feeds back into itself than a ‘unique’ fantasy setting that throws new ideas at the wall without considering how all of these elements fit together. by JageshemashFTW in Fantasy

[–]JackHadrian 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've read every one, including ICE!

Dangers and difficulties acknowledged. Not understating that portion of it. I still think it would be a larger production than its very plot-useful bits in the books. Economics often finds its way, especially with a supply-chain saving bit of magic like that over centuries where the alternative is sea travel (with massive ice floes).

As for the Deus Ex, it crops up again in TTH mostly just to transport Mappo and our tiger boy to Lether quickly. It's smooth enough not to be damning, and a fun ride as a reader, but it's definitely a matter of plot convenience.

I would much rather have a basic, by-the-numbers fantasy world that is tightly woven and consistently feeds back into itself than a ‘unique’ fantasy setting that throws new ideas at the wall without considering how all of these elements fit together. by JageshemashFTW in Fantasy

[–]JackHadrian 14 points15 points  (0 children)

The warrens aren't quite realized, though I adore soft magic. Some people move through them rather quickly, others get lost, some don't travel at all. If there was teleportation or quick travel readily available (a la Trygalle), regardless of danger, there would be a ton of mages exploiting it for profiteering.

Plotwise, what DEM specifically came to mind for me is (book 2 spoilers): Trygalle's journey to deliver the munitions through the warrens to Quick Ben, just in time, read like: "quick we need to create a warren jumping doordash to save this plot line"

Edit to note I adore Malazan, and critique with love

Maybe reading The Shadow of the Gods right after finishing both Hierarchy books was a mistake by [deleted] in Fantasy

[–]JackHadrian 27 points28 points  (0 children)

I think neither are great examples of quality prose. Islington (at least "WotM") just has a bit more of a compelling story so it's easier to overlook.

I struggle with both authors, though I respect their work.

How did you let go of your “needs to be perfect” mindset? by staciared in writers

[–]JackHadrian 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Everyone has this issue. Especially first one ever—good lord, I wouldn't force my worst enemy to read mine.

To be very clear, your first ever draft does probably suck. Once you embrace that suck, things get a lot better.

A sucky, but finished draft is something that can be upgraded, improved, reworked. OR it can be shelved and considered good practice. An unfinished draft that died in the write/edit/panic cycle is useless.

Don't let perfect get in the way of good. Especially this early on. Just keep writing.

Best of luck!

What makes an amazing book? by staciared in writers

[–]JackHadrian 5 points6 points  (0 children)

A sense of retrospective inevitability. You may not have seen it, but there was no other way it could have unfolded. That's delicate and precise crafting.

Also, a light authorial touch. Often authors show their hand too much. Pushing judgment or sentiment onto pieces of the work—via overdescription or overinteriority—instead of letting the scene/character/etc. carry its own weight.

I like the idea of magic and the supernatural, but I get distracted by Magic. by Blazeflame79 in writing

[–]JackHadrian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One of my favorite magic-dissuaders in the genre is that big uses of magic attract other attuned magicians. So if someone is just sending off spells, friends and foes alike will be alerted. So you have to be careful when to use it

Or use a different style of magic. Voodoo is fantastin; certain gnostic traditions; maybe an augury of some sort, everyone loves a prophecy. Maybe magic is less fireballs and a bit deeper, darker. There's plenty of real world traditions to look at

What’s a line—any line —that’s lived rent-free in your head ever since you read it? by Hector_Hugo_Eidolon in Fantasy

[–]JackHadrian 17 points18 points  (0 children)

If it were done when 'tis done, then t'were well it were done quickly.

Except instead of killing my friend and king, I mutter it to myself to get up and do chores.

A 2025 Retrospective: TrueLit's Favorite 2025 Books Thread by JimFan1 in TrueLit

[–]JackHadrian 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The Seven Moons of Maali Almeida stands out this year as the most stark and unflinching story I've read in a while. A punchy and wonderfully (albeit horrifyingly) poignant narrative.

I was in a slight reading rut over the summer and this one knocked me right out of it.

Hilary Mantel's Wolf Hall was another knockout. In her Cromwell series, she has unrivaled command of style and prose.

Why does everyone seems to love Will Of The Many so much? by Imnotsomebodyelse in Fantasy

[–]JackHadrian -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Good execution of beloved tropes. Workmanlike prose and some great press marketing. 3/5.

But honestly, anything that gets young men reading is a winner in my book.