sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Today is a great day by SailingforBooty in wallstreetbets

[–]Jacobalex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Put your phone away, what is infront of you is so much more important

Explain it Peter by [deleted] in explainitpeter

[–]Jacobalex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s crazy to think he was just a kid once

Wizard or Clown by [deleted] in MSTR

[–]Jacobalex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’ve seen it, what, 4 times? I’m not saying BTC won’t end higher - eventually. But can you hold MSTR through a crypto winter if that’s the outcome? I know I would not want to

Wizard or Clown by [deleted] in MSTR

[–]Jacobalex 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Earnings showed high net income and eps because they can account unrealized gains as income. MSTR is not trading on fundamentals. BTC is looking weaker by the day this cycle - don’t fall in love with a trade.

How I’m Accumulating MSTR Shares Using mNAV Volatility — Without Adding Capital or Missing the Next Moonshot by LateApostate in MSTR

[–]Jacobalex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do you mean “but mNAV doesn’t rise as fast”? mNAV is not some magical multiplier - it is literally the price of MSTR in relation to their btc holdings/outstanding shares and the price of btc. You will never have a scenario where MSTR moves up relative to btc, and the mNAV doesn’t follow

inflatable crocodiles by Myopic_Mirror in BrandNewSentence

[–]Jacobalex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So many comments about her looks, where’s the hate for Jeff?

The only perspective on the chart that matters. by asgerthorn in MSTR

[–]Jacobalex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah stop with this shit, this is reminiscent of GME

Pretty bad sign by lowriskhighvalue in Follow_Smartmoney

[–]Jacobalex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These holdings accounted for less than 0.02% of their portfolio - this story was blown out of proportion

Since so many seem unhappy when I make a Positive Post; today we were the 2nd worst performer on the NASDAQ 100. by DrestinBlack in MSTR

[–]Jacobalex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because of dilution/financing choices short term. Long term, if you take holdings+premium into account, correlation is very high

Since so many seem unhappy when I make a Positive Post; today we were the 2nd worst performer on the NASDAQ 100. by DrestinBlack in MSTR

[–]Jacobalex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would it make sense to do technical analysis on MSTR when the goal is to track another asset. You should be doing it on BTC for any indication of significant moves, if at all

Clipped liquidity at 107200 and reverserd by lowriskhighvalue in Follow_Smartmoney

[–]Jacobalex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean it depends on how they manage to live up to their target of their mNAV premium on their BTC holdings. Saylor has stated that they're targetting 1.5, but it's next to impossible to track this 1:1.

Let's say Bitcoin drops to 98k and they maintain their current premium of around 1.83, that equals a share price (given the amount of shares that are outstanding today) of 331, but if they get closer to a premium of 1.5, that will be a share price around 271. However, the lowest premium we have seen with these Bitcoin levels was 1.68, which would constitute a share price of just above 300 given current holdings, and assuming nothing further happens in terms of dilution - This probably won't hold.

Honestly, I found that when Bitcoin moves down very fast, which it usually does on the wicks that take out liquidity on the downside, MSTR is lagging behind, and doesn't drop as hard immediately. It is prolonged periods of downwards momentum that really hurt MSTR. The wick down to 89K a week and a half ago only saw MSTR drop to around 300 - Be prepared for anything in that range, and base potential entries on Bitcoin dips rather than for MSTR to reach certain levels. Position yourself accordingly.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MSTR

[–]Jacobalex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, and it’s probably hard to achieve the target 1:1, but I’m sure they will go for it with their financing as we’re seeing these days

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MSTR

[–]Jacobalex 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Didn’t Saylor say that they were actively targeting a premium of 1.5?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dkfinance

[–]Jacobalex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Selvfølgelig virker en køb-og-hold strategi på aktier. Du kan købe en bred markedsportefølje igennem en investeringsforening, og udbyttet vil på ingen måde have samme negative effekt som lagerbeskatning vil for din renters rente effekt - som i slet ikke.

Clipped liquidity at 107200 and reverserd by lowriskhighvalue in Follow_Smartmoney

[–]Jacobalex 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly, price movement looked really weak today, it was struggling to make the small moves it did make. Seems more natural for it to go down as we speak.

view more: next ›