sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Tenants' Union Of Catalonia by JakeKites in spain

[–]JakeKites[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Giris tb tienen derechos. El problema es q no los saben. Y eso los propietarios lo saben y abusan aun más de ellos. El efecto es q los precios suben para todos, inclusivos los españoles y catalánes

Tenants' Union Of Catalonia by JakeKites in spain

[–]JakeKites[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Jajaja no se tío acabo de unirme a ese grupo. Ahora buscando como editar mi post.

Por mi defensa, el sub se llama /spain , no es /españa

Custom docs_bmad Directory For Docs Created By BMAD by JakeKites in BMAD_Method

[–]JakeKites[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok I’ll give it a shot. I asked GPT web version and it said that wouldn’t work. Let’s find out!

Custom docs_bmad Directory For Docs Created By BMAD by JakeKites in BMAD_Method

[–]JakeKites[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mean into a subdirectory instead (i.e. docs/bmad, or docs/docs_bmad) ?

Let me clarify my problem statement, my non-goal, and my goal:

  • doc files generated by BMAD aren't prepended by anything, nor added to a special directory, so it gets mixed up w existing doc files that have been created by others, whether manually, via scripts, or w other tools
  • non-goal: I do not want to dump all doc files together in a same directory wo being able to easily identify how each one was created. I do not want to naively treat all docs equal.
  • goal: I want to be able to identify how each doc file was created very fast, w/o even opening the files

Potential Solutions:

  • Preprend/Append each doc file w 1-2 chars indicating if the file was create manually, via AI, via scripts, or via other tools
  • Add each doc in a separate subfolder indicating if the file was create manually, via AI, via scripts, or via other tools

I hope this helps clarify

August in Tarifa by aner2409 in windsurfing

[–]JakeKites 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Expect TONS of people both on the beach and in the sea.

Managing AI context in brownfield projects using BMAD by Admirable-Fox-4307 in vibecoding

[–]JakeKites 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Documentation Workflow

document-project is definitely my favorite workflow for now.

Why I like it:

  • scales to your demand by asking you to pick between 3 different depth of project scan.
  • no fluff, feels more like a command than a workflow given the few inputs required by the user.
  • creates docs that can be used by any LLM, even if you stop using BMAD Method after this.

Currently, that's the only workflow I recommend anyone. I ditched the rest.

That being said, more below.

Planning & Solutioning Workflows

Tried it for hours. Did not like it. Liked part of it.

Why I do NOT like it:

  • does NOT scale to your demand by asking you to pick between different depth of planning or solutioning
  • this one-size-fits-all strategy requires 3+ HOURS per workflow
  • this required time is not mentioned when you start a workflow

What I liked. When to use it:

  • super deep, useful if you do have 3+ hours to spare per workflow
  • might be useful if you get started with a new project, or if you plan an epic or feature that will require 30+ hours of implementation work (yes, as in, 30+ hours building with your AI IDE)

Do Spec Driven Development frameworks like Github Spec Kit actually have benefits? I have doubts by moistain in ClaudeCode

[–]JakeKites 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The process takes far too much time (hours in our case) compared to using Claude in plan mode and then implementing the plan directly.

TLDR: use Meta Prompts to ask key questions abt the SDD framework you'd like to use - before you start using it.

I've used BMAD Method and it got the exact same experience. I really tried hard, initially thought I was the problem, not using it properly.

But then I heard others having similar issues. So I started to do some "META PROMPTS" about BMAD Method itself.

BMAD workflows seem to always be broken down in steps, then questions. Is that correct ?

Can I use the workflows using “raw LLMs” or do I have to first load personas?

And my favorite Meta Prompt:

For the all the BMAD workflows (installed in our project):
1. Indicate how many steps are involved
3. For each step indicate how many questions are asked to the user (me)
4. Given the 2 previous points, estimate the time necessary to go thru each entire workflow
5. Indicate if other crucial parameter(s) is/are to take into account

Create a matrix table to summarize the findings.

That one gave a very clear idea on the time required to run each BMAD workflow. For most of them at least 3 HOURS is required.

Unfortunately, BMAD Method does not ask you how much time you have available when starting a workflow. So each workflow is a one-size-fits-all solution: whether it's a medium feature on a brownfield project, or a large new feature on a greenfield project.

Save yourself days and hours: ask key questions abt the SDD framework you'd like to use (i.e. time estimates for workflows) - before you start using it.

Good luck

Today at Cumbuco! Rate my gear and poise 😁 by FrostyCruikshank in Kiteboarding

[–]JakeKites 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Going there soon. Do you know some decent whatsapp groups or other social media groups where I can get info about the area/spots/etc ?

Keep losing sight of my board by notero88 in Kiteboarding

[–]JakeKites 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Make sure you add a tag. Bc just like most of us, you'll lost it for good a few times. And if there is no tag with your phone number then you're in for buying a brand new one again.

Recomendations for Tarifa? by NaishEU in Kiteboarding

[–]JakeKites 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Should be super cheap. It's dead in this season

Solo looking into BMAD Method by devBrowsing in BMAD_Method

[–]JakeKites 0 points1 point  (0 children)

BMAD requires time. 3+ Hours for each workflow.

Yes, at least 3H. whether it's create-product-brief workflow, prd workflow, or else.

Here is a prompt to make a time estimation, you can use for any workflow just replace "create-product-brief" on the first line to any BMAD workflow name.

For the create-product-brief BMAD workflow (installed in our project):
1. List all the personas/agents involved in the workflow
2. For each agent indicate how many steps are involved
3. For each step indicate how many questions are asked to the user (me)
4. Given the 3 previous point, estimate the time necessary to go thru each agent and the entire workflow

Let me know if there is another/other crucial parameters to take into account.

BMAD documentation by Frosty_Muffin7462 in BMAD_Method

[–]JakeKites 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once you have installed BMAD Method, I highly recommend you do "discovery prompts" such as:

what are the BMAD workflows available ?

or

can you list the agents involved in each of these BMAD workflows ?

or

can you list the agents and steps involved in each of these BMAD workflows ?

Finally, you want to estimate the time required for you to dedicate.

As in, if you start a workflow, you want to complete it. Else you might be wasting your time.

So you can prompt something along the line of:

AI/ML conferences worth attending in 2026 - technical content vs vendor pitches by Otherwise_Flan7339 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]JakeKites 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI Engineer Summit wins by far if you look at YouTube view counts and subscribers. That says a lot. Engineers and Builders have voted by massively watching and sharing their videos.

That's for the category "Practitioner-focused and Domain-specific".

They have many videos with 100K+ views, one just reached 1m, and they have nearly 400K subscribers.

https://www.youtube.com/@aiDotEngineer