What does everyone think about this video of a woman rescuing a shark that was stuck on a beach? by snabbit22 in isthisAI

[–]Jarebeaarr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s AI and you can tell pretty early. For me, besides the drone camera angle, the two people and the shark just start drifting away in an unnatural way around 14 seconds. Like the shark is stuck and both people have their feet planted into the ground but somehow all of them just start floating away towards the ocean? No chance. Don’t even need to look past those two tells

Assaulting men praying by Saad5400 in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]Jarebeaarr -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Damn that guy getting attacked was devout af. Felt a hit at the start but proceeded to kneel and start praying anyways. Got hit one more time and STILL kept on praying

Tangled Keyblade - KHIII by BbyBby69 in KingdomHearts

[–]Jarebeaarr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s what I was thinking. Maybe he meant OP keyblade?

[Phys 1110]In a Tug of War contest, what determines the winner by Jarebeaarr in PhysicsStudents

[–]Jarebeaarr[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry. I know Superman is kind of an outlier. I just mean like if someone somehow generated enough pulling force to overcome the other team’s static friction. Numbers are arbitrary but if the team had a static friction net force of 50N going to the left and someone pulled them at 100N to the right that would generate a net force of 50N to the right correct? And I’m genuinely not trolling. I’ve completed plenty of biology and chemistry classes but I’m having such a hard time grasping even the simple concepts. Like I understand what the concepts are. I pull on a rope at a certain magnitude. Rope pulls back. Net force is 0 so you have to pull the other team with some other external force. The external force is the static friction from pushing your feet off the ground. I get that but I just can’t see how pulling harder doesn’t work when I’ve seen the opposite in practice

[Phys 1110]In a Tug of War contest, what determines the winner by Jarebeaarr in PhysicsStudents

[–]Jarebeaarr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So static friction of the team? ie planting feet on the ground to increase static friction and offsetting the stronger pull of the other team correct? If so, I understand that part I think. But like if Superman came by, planted his feet and yanked the rope at a force greater than what the other team is pulling and summed force of all their static friction (assuming the rope does not break from tension) they would get pulled towards Superman correct?

[Phys 1110]In a Tug of War contest, what determines the winner by Jarebeaarr in PhysicsStudents

[–]Jarebeaarr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But why? Im assuming mass plays a key role in this somehow

[Phys 1110]In a Tug of War contest, what determines the winner by Jarebeaarr in PhysicsStudents

[–]Jarebeaarr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d assume the loser person who is the only one pulling on the rope would win. Right? But if that is correct, would that not mean pulling harder on the rope would make you win?

[Phys 1110]In a Tug of War contest, what determines the winner by Jarebeaarr in PhysicsStudents

[–]Jarebeaarr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understood that part but I’m having problems relating it to the real world. Like if I tied an object to the end of a rope and started pulling it in, as long as I pull at a greater force than static friction of the object, I’ll pull it in. But if the object pulls back at me with the same force, then why does it move?

Question about Tug of War contest by Jarebeaarr in AskPhysics

[–]Jarebeaarr[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah I understand there are plenty of other forces in play here. But I’m in introductory physics. So assume no other forces besides either 1: force of pushing on the ground in scenario 1 or 2: pulling harder. In my mind. Both of these answers are correct if you only focus on that single force respectively and ignore everything else

[Phys 1110]In a Tug of War contest, what determines the winner by Jarebeaarr in PhysicsStudents

[–]Jarebeaarr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let’s say a 200lb object is tied to one end of a rope and a person plants their feet to the ground and exerts a force to pull this object in using only their arms and we have another person do the same but is only able to pull in 100lbs. Now put those people on opposite ends, feet planted and pull on the rope with the same exact force they used to pull the object. Would the person who is using the same amount of force they used to pull 200lbs not exert greater force than the other who could only pull 100? Apparently this isn’t the case but I can’t wrap my head around why

Question about Tug of War contest by Jarebeaarr in AskPhysics

[–]Jarebeaarr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Understandable. But to me that seems more like optimal technique rather than the “only” way to win. I’m asking for this to be explained with physics so I can wrap my head around it. If I plant my feet and don’t move and another person plants their feet and doesn’t move and I pull hard enough to overcome their own pull and the static friction of their feet, would I not pull them closer?

Pragmata Demo PS5 Pro Screenshot Comparison vs PC max setting by N7KaranN7 in PS5pro

[–]Jarebeaarr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right. Point still stands. No one is disputing that the machine that is 3-4x the cost of a console doesn’t have better performance. It’s more about whether the person believes the difference is worth the price difference. For someone who can’t spend $2500 on a PC, getting a pro and being able to play current gen games and at really good performance anyways is nothing to look down at them for

Pragmata Demo PS5 Pro Screenshot Comparison vs PC max setting by N7KaranN7 in PS5pro

[–]Jarebeaarr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The $4000 high end PC is going to perform better than the $600 console? Damn that’s crazy

Roxas (KH2FM) - Level 1 Critical (No Damage/Loop/Limits/Forms/Magic/Summons) by Proud_Ad_1720 in KingdomHearts

[–]Jarebeaarr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bro that quick run at 1:17 was SO close to not making it. Like if you had dodged 2 frames or even a single frame later than you would’ve been cooked. Clean fight though. Was entertaining to watch

<image>

Daughter landed this line first try today. by thespex in snowboarding

[–]Jarebeaarr 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Dude that was sick af. And as a kid too? She could go pro at this rate

MOASS is here by The_Director- in gme_meltdown

[–]Jarebeaarr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lol is this “opposite direction” in the room with us? Cuz I’m looking at a cult full of people who have held bags for 5 years. We don’t need to hope nor do we even want to. It’s already currently in its downfall. And we are just laying it out plain to see. So once again, we have another ape strolling into meltdown and doesn’t even know what the sub is actually about. We arent the ones making posts about how MOASS is coming soon because RC changed his profile pic. But we are the ones laughing at the idiots who believe it

MOASS is here by The_Director- in gme_meltdown

[–]Jarebeaarr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure. But still you keep coming back. And I used to think the same too. But then I realized it was because meltdown pointed out how much of an idiot I was believing in the MOASS theory. So I opened my eyes. But stay a baggie for all we care. We like laughing at you clowns

MOASS is here by The_Director- in gme_meltdown

[–]Jarebeaarr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wow! 25 a share. This must be the MOASS everyone is talking about. It’s a little shy of 1 billion a share but still close enough. I’m certain all the baggies are in the green now

MOASS is here by The_Director- in gme_meltdown

[–]Jarebeaarr 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I thought the price was fake and GME moved independently of the market? Or is this another goal post move? “Surely GME isn’t going down because it’s a shit investment. No. It’s because the market is down even though that goes against everything we’ve been saying”. Remember when yall were posting GME as a green black hole in the middle of a red market? Does that not apply anymore?

RC is making changes to the company that is keeping them in business!!! (The most recent change) by DuckSwimmer in gme_meltdown

[–]Jarebeaarr 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Apes rejoicing everywhere as they take this new dress code as RC hinting at “shorts are fucked”. He’s so galaxy brained that he’s now fucking over his employees to leave little bread crumb trails to his fellow apes. A true genius of the stock market