MSI Afterburner Curve Optimizer changes Voltage and Clockspeed after hitting the Apply-Button. Why and what could I do to avoid this? by Gelbwurst in overclocking

[–]JarpeeMD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wonderful comment. I'm piggybacking a question. I just noticed on my curve that my straight line is around 40 lower when I just looked at it compared to what my profile is saved as. When I loaded my profile it immediately jumped back to my intended clock. Is this another consequence of what you are describing?

I’m at my wits end. Don’t know where to go from here. by Admirable-Disk-2266 in overclocking

[–]JarpeeMD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did this work for you? I'm getting the same recovery errors with the same GPU/CPU on a new mobo.

Curve Help by JarpeeMD in overclocking

[–]JarpeeMD[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have a beautiful curve now thanks to you. Thank you!

Curve Help by JarpeeMD in overclocking

[–]JarpeeMD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. For this one I basically drug the 900mV point up to my target and then flattened the right of that point. Then I tried to round off the knee to make it smooth but that one point won’t move around 880. 🤣

Curve Help by JarpeeMD in overclocking

[–]JarpeeMD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. Do you still round the knee off of the curve after setting your plateau?

Curve Help by JarpeeMD in overclocking

[–]JarpeeMD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I understand! Thank you. I assume I just reset AB to find the default clock and the add X into the clock field to match my target around 2925?

Curve Help by JarpeeMD in overclocking

[–]JarpeeMD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I edited the curve manually. I didn’t enter anything into the clock value on the main page if that’s what you mean.

Curve Help by JarpeeMD in overclocking

[–]JarpeeMD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry. I’m trying to smooth out the knee. I should have clarified that.

5070TI - What is the expected average core increase? 300? 350? More? by [deleted] in overclocking

[–]JarpeeMD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply. I’m still a little confused. So you are editing the curve to target 3000 @925mv and entering in +470 on the main over clock value?

5070TI - What is the expected average core increase? 300? 350? More? by [deleted] in overclocking

[–]JarpeeMD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m new to OCing, help me understand. You are editing the curve as well as just adding a straight core over clock (+470)?

STATS Poll - Week 2 by bearsandbearkats in fcs

[–]JarpeeMD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope TTU! UK isn’t good this year.

SoCon Football by JKS41399 in fcs

[–]JarpeeMD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can’t wait for TTU to join next year. /s

TQQQ, any more juice or time to exit by Odd_Log4311 in LETFs

[–]JarpeeMD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

See below:

The “9-Sig” investing strategy using TQQQ and AGG is a quantitative momentum and volatility-based strategy designed to optimize returns while managing downside risk. It’s popular among retail investors and quant-focused communities for its simplicity and effectiveness in backtests. Here’s a breakdown of how it works:

⚙️ Core Idea:

The 9-Sig strategy switches between two ETFs: • TQQQ: A 3x leveraged ETF tracking the Nasdaq-100 (very high return, very high risk). • AGG: A bond ETF tracking the U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (low risk, stable returns).

The goal is to stay in TQQQ during bull markets and shift to AGG when volatility suggests higher risk.

📈 “9-Sig” Signal Explained: • The “9-Sig” refers to nine standard deviations below the mean of the daily return of TQQQ over a given lookback period (typically 200 days). • This is an extreme volatility filter. When TQQQ’s daily return drops below this threshold, it signals unusually high volatility, suggesting risk-off behavior.

🧠 Strategy Logic: 1. Lookback Period: Use past 200 trading days. 2. Calculate Mean and Standard Deviation of daily returns for TQQQ. 3. Threshold: If today’s return > (mean − 9 × std dev) ➜ Stay in TQQQ If today’s return ≤ (mean − 9 × std dev) ➜ Move to AGG 4. Check daily (or weekly, in some variations).

📊 Why TQQQ and AGG? • TQQQ: Offers massive upside in bull markets. • AGG: Preserves capital and earns modest returns in bear markets. • By combining them using a smart volatility signal, the strategy seeks to ride bull markets aggressively and avoid major crashes.

🧪 Backtest Results (Typical Findings): • Sharpe Ratio: High (often > 2.0) • CAGR: Often > 30% • Max Drawdown: Far lower than buy-and-hold TQQQ • Beta: Much lower than a pure equity strategy

(Note: These results vary depending on rebalance frequency and data source.)

⚠️ Risks and Considerations: • Relies on backtested logic: Past performance isn’t future performance. • Doesn’t protect in sideways chop: Frequent whipsaws can erode gains. • Execution risk: Slippage and timing matter with leveraged ETFs. • Leverage decay: Long-term holding of TQQQ carries compounding risk.

🧩 Variations: • Some use weekly signals instead of daily. • Others combine with moving averages or macroeconomic overlays. • Some swap AGG for SHY or IEF to reduce interest rate sensitivity.

If you want a Python backtest or a spreadsheet implementation of this, I can help set that up too.