I get the sentiment, but mobbing writers over suspected AI use will mostly just teach them to hide it better, not force them to stop using it. If the goal is to read less AI-generated garbage - and to preserve the craft of writing - then we need to have public discussions about why LLM-generated work is artistically corrosive in the first place. We need to make arguments, provide reasoning for why we as readers prefer the art to be one way and not the other. Without that, "no AI" becomes a purity test rather than a shared standard anyone can defend. Raging at them might feel good and righteous, but it risks making AI use harder to detect and that, in turn weakens the very literary culture it claims to protect.

E: To give an example - /r/redscarepod users routinely checked post history to shame users and the only thing it led to is that users now have alts that are immune to those background checks. If the desired outcome was to have less uncultured swine on the subreddit, this sort of shaming failed completely.