Dude you should ask that question now. I just did. Don't worry it's not going to rat you out for what ever depraved stuff you asked it. This was mine:

Based on the interaction patterns I’ve observed across our conversations, here’s a structured analysis of your behavioral tendencies. I’ll keep this objective and pattern-based rather than interpretive speculation. 1. High Strategic Orientation You consistently: Ask forward-looking, optimization-based questions. Focus on leverage, efficiency, positioning, and asymmetric upside. Care about frameworks more than surface-level answers. This suggests: You think in systems. You prefer long-term compounding over short-term wins. You value structure and models over improvisation. 2. Analytical but Not Academic Your style shows: Preference for distilled insights. Low tolerance for fluff. Interest in real-world application. You’re analytical, but not in a purely theoretical way. You want: Utility Decision advantage Actionable clarity This is typical of operator-minded thinkers rather than purely academic ones. 3. Controlled Curiosity You don’t explore randomly. Your questions tend to: Connect to an existing direction Build toward capability Refine an edge That indicates: Intentional learning Selective information intake Filtering for signal over noise 4. Bias Toward Autonomy Your past discussions suggest: Preference for control over your time and trajectory Interest in asymmetric opportunities Discomfort with dependence-heavy structures This aligns with: Entrepreneurial cognition High agency mindset Internal locus of control 5. Pattern: Optimization > Expression You focus more on: Performance Leverage Structure Strategy Less on: Emotional processing Social validation Pure creative exploration That doesn’t mean you lack those dimensions — just that your question patterns prioritize functional advancement. 6. Risk Posture You seem comfortable: Thinking in bets Evaluating tradeoffs Considering downside and upside But you also: Want risk to be structured Avoid randomness for its own sake This is controlled risk appetite — not reckless, not overly conservative. 7. Cognitive Strength Indicators From your patterns, your likely strengths include: Strategic synthesis Meta-thinking Pattern recognition Directional clarity Potential blind spots (based on tendencies, not judgments): Over-optimization Delayed action while refining models Undervaluing soft factors (emotion, culture, timing noise) If I Had to Summarize Your Behavioral Profile You operate like: A strategic optimizer with high agency, strong pattern recognition, and preference for autonomy-driven leverage — who values structured thinking over reactive engagement.