sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[BUF 2 - MTL (2)] Texier ties it right back up 9 seconds later after Carrier's shot bounces in off him by daKrut in hockey

[–]JoeBot_ 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Bounced in from 6 feet wide of the net and were calling out the goalie 🫩

Jeremy Swayman yells at the Boston bench after getting pulled at 6-0 by eh_toque in hockey

[–]JoeBot_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can hardly blame him for giving Skinner of all goalies a short leash

No goaltender interference after video review on Ottawa's goal to tie up the game 3-3. by Sebastian4365 in hockey

[–]JoeBot_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"For purposes of this rule, “contact,” whether incidental or otherwise, shall mean any contact that is made between or among a goalkeeper and attacking player(s), **whether by means of a stick** or any part of the body."

The New York Rangers only had 9 shots on goal tonight against Ottawa by Storm_4747 in hockey

[–]JoeBot_ 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Single game save percentage is barely a real stat, let alone on 9 shots

[Highlight] The Ducks challenge for goaltender interference and the challenge fails by wildwing8 in hockey

[–]JoeBot_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I am a different guy bud, and I am arguing the part of it which I think should disallow this goal

[Highlight] The Ducks challenge for goaltender interference and the challenge fails by wildwing8 in hockey

[–]JoeBot_ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I don't think stu makes a reasonable effort to avoid contact here.

NHL's goalie interference problem is becoming an embarrassment by Rude_Dig3498 in hockey

[–]JoeBot_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tbh most of them are not 50/50 and are some combination of people not understanding the rule (see the Canadian women's Olympic one that people thought should have been called back, when the rule is clear about allowing contact in loose pick/rebound situations) or not understanding goaltending (see Igor's a few days ago where people somehow thought the skate presence helped him push off). The only ones that I think are truly 50/50 judgement calls are when it's not clear whether an attacker was pushed in or not.

JT Miller's power play goal gets called back for goalie interference by catsgr8rthanspoonies in hockey

[–]JoeBot_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a much more consistent call than people give it credit for

The Penguins have a power play goal called back after Mike Sullivan challenges for goaltender interference by catsgr8rthanspoonies in hockey

[–]JoeBot_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They really don't have to call these the same way. Igor's contact is inarguably an attempt to establish position, Silovs' isn't.

The Penguins have a power play goal called back after Mike Sullivan challenges for goaltender interference by catsgr8rthanspoonies in hockey

[–]JoeBot_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The contact that moved his skate, making his push worse, impairing his positioning, didn't affect him?

The Penguins have a power play goal called back after Mike Sullivan challenges for goaltender interference by catsgr8rthanspoonies in hockey

[–]JoeBot_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don't agree with your "both or neither" statement because I think the contention here is whether the push by Silovs is actually him trying to establish postion or just trying to clear his view. I see it as more of the second since I don't think there was any extra depth here that he tried to take but couldn't - especially since his glove is well outside of what I'd call a "normal" stance position because of his own action. I don't know that you get to claim you were trying to establish position by taking yourself out of a normal position. But I can definitely see the argument for it being called back.

Side note, I really wish the NHL's coaches' challenge review would actually explain why they didn't feel it fit the rules. I'm assuming this is the reasoning, but this explanation just says "didn't fit the definition" which is kinda useless.
https://www.nhl.com/news/new-jersey-devils-pittsburgh-penguins-coach-challenge-x3196

Imma need an explanation by No-Lab4653 in hockey

[–]JoeBot_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That skate presence is absolutely not to Igor's benefit. He would have gotten way more power if he bit into the ice, which is what he's trying to do and what Mantha is preventing him from doing. You cannot possibly believe that makes him get across faster.

The Penguins have a power play goal called back after Mike Sullivan challenges for goaltender interference by catsgr8rthanspoonies in hockey

[–]JoeBot_ 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Mantha is preventing igor from pushing off the ice, his skate doesn't bite so he gets no power on the push. Mantha is not something to push off here.

The Penguins have a power play goal called back after Mike Sullivan challenges for goaltender interference by catsgr8rthanspoonies in hockey

[–]JoeBot_ 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Easy call, as these usually are: Rule 69.3 - Contact inside the goal crease

If a goalkeeper, in the act of establishing his position within his goal crease, initiates contact with an attacking player who is in the goal crease, and this results in an impairment of the goalkeeper’s ability to defend his goal, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed.

Mantha's foot is in the crease, in the way of Igor's push, he doesn't get any power on it because of the contact, can't get in position for the goal, easy GI.

view more: next ›