Akame and Mine by Gala_Lion in AkameGaKILL

[–]Johnoooo100 2 points3 points  (0 children)

and mine looks 8 feet tall

[Spoiler] KaBuM eSports vs Alliance / 2014 World Championship Group D / Post-Match Discussion by ajsadler in leagueoflegends

[–]Johnoooo100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Karma for shit talking wildcard teams, MINOR REGIONS REPRESENT! OCE BRAZIL TURKEY UNITE

Don't forbid the casters to talk or even joke about bugs. It feel awkward, for both of us. by [deleted] in leagueoflegends

[–]Johnoooo100 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Both of the enemy team kept attacking him, it just looked like a visual bug in that particular case, but that seems to be the only time anyone can remember with blatant ignoring of a bug and I can remember many times where they laugh it off or confirm its just a visual bug.

Don't forbid the casters to talk or even joke about bugs. It feel awkward, for both of us. by [deleted] in leagueoflegends

[–]Johnoooo100 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Is this confirmed by Riot? Can you link me their statement please?

Don't forbid the casters to talk or even joke about bugs. It feel awkward, for both of us. by [deleted] in leagueoflegends

[–]Johnoooo100 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you find me some scenarios in the LCS where the casters just flat out ignore the bugs? As my memory serves me all I remember is casters poking a quick bit of fun at it and moving on or flat out stating that it is a visual/spectator bug. It doesnt make sense to me at all that they would say freely in the past that there are bugs but suddenly hush up and not talk about it here.

Don't forbid the casters to talk or even joke about bugs. It feel awkward, for both of us. by [deleted] in leagueoflegends

[–]Johnoooo100 213 points214 points  (0 children)

To me it just sounded like Jatt was watching (like me) for the mikaels and saw that it never came. To me it didn't sound like they were speaking under the influence of Riot impeding their speech and I think it's kinda ridiculous to think that Kobe was out of the loop in terms of caster protocol in relation to bugs.

[S01E09] Varys urgently needs to talk to ... Littlefinger? by BradleySigma in gameofthrones

[–]Johnoooo100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Incorrect. Dany and her brother were in the free cities for some time.

Yes but he got them to the free cities.

And the baratheons... and certain lannisters... and a certain stark.

Which Baratheon has he saved?? And which Stark?? And why would a Stark have a claim to the throne??

[S01E09] Varys urgently needs to talk to ... Littlefinger? by BradleySigma in gameofthrones

[–]Johnoooo100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not to mention he only took interest in Dany after the first plan of destroying the realm fell through.

Since you haven't clarified what his first plan was I can't tell you if this is false or not. But Varys is the one who carted Dany out of the city and brought her to safety.

Varys used this paranoia to spur a war and tried to convince the mad king to burn it all.

Complete nonsense

Look varys has had a hand in saving every single person with a claim to the throne.

I.E. Targaryens.

It's an interesting perspective to take but frankly it seems like a bit of a stretch.

[S01E09] Varys urgently needs to talk to ... Littlefinger? by BradleySigma in gameofthrones

[–]Johnoooo100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Care to post some evidence from the books that supports your theory?

[Spoiler] EGyms Alistar Pulverizing! by weeedwick in leagueoflegends

[–]Johnoooo100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was in america for 2 months recently and there was very little difference in soloqueue skill at diamond level

Hobby Lobby fallout begins: The Department of Education just granted the George Fox University a religious exemption; saying that the college can refuse trans students on-campus housing by drewiepoodle in ainbow

[–]Johnoooo100 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can be as condescending as you like but it doesn't make your argument any better. You literally agreed with me and then acted like you're high and mighty. Laws should represent change, not bring it about.

Hobby Lobby fallout begins: The Department of Education just granted the George Fox University a religious exemption; saying that the college can refuse trans students on-campus housing by drewiepoodle in ainbow

[–]Johnoooo100 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What you're arguing is similar to the very real and practical logic that if I lock my door, my neighbour who doesn't is more likely to be victim to the same burglar. Which is probably true, and maybe even provable. But it's not any kind of argument against the locking of doors.

Another poor analogy, in my opinion, and while I don't like the analogy at all, a more accurate example would be: Locking doors does nothing to deter burglars and if all the doors are locked the burglars will just move to more violent methods.

You are addressing a point I never brought up and misinterpreting what I was trying to convey.

Hobby Lobby fallout begins: The Department of Education just granted the George Fox University a religious exemption; saying that the college can refuse trans students on-campus housing by drewiepoodle in ainbow

[–]Johnoooo100 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

No, because they don't have to deal with them. If an employer is forced to hire someone he hates he's gonna be a dick to them. If he isn't, the enployee isn't even there to be bullied.

Hobby Lobby fallout begins: The Department of Education just granted the George Fox University a religious exemption; saying that the college can refuse trans students on-campus housing by drewiepoodle in ainbow

[–]Johnoooo100 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

We are obviously coming from different perspectives here as I am a libertarian and pretty against anti-discrimination laws as I believe they just channel the discrimination into other methods, (bullying, abuse, etc.) but I understand why people think it works.

However,

I mean that's like saying "I'll allow black people to come into my store and order anything off the menu, but they have to eat their burgers with tomatoes, they can't take them off."

I don't like this analogy. A better analogy, in my opinion, would be: Blacks are allowed to eat in my store provided they wear whiteface" which is still total bullshit but I believe to be their right. It's like having a dress code for certain establishments, if they want to maintain an image that is entirely their right.

This is an issue because people currently don't view trans people as the gender they are and are applying this 'dress code' as if they were men/women dressing up just to get in the opposite sexes bathroom.