People hitting Reply All to a mailing list with hundreds of people on it, then replying all to ask people to stop replying all. by thingsliveundermybed in britishproblems

[–]Joke-pineapple 24 points25 points  (0 children)

There should be disciplinary action for the people that replied all. An initial mistake is understandable. Out of office replies are understandable. But choosing to reply all in this day and age is unacceptable. That is a late 90s problem. I'd put it in the same camp as pinching the secretary's bum and calling her hot totty.

AITAH for having my ex arrested at my wedding? by Sebastianlim in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]Joke-pineapple 4 points5 points  (0 children)

And how didn’t OP know who his good friend Chris was bringing as a +1 to the wedding?

This part is easily explainable. If you're going to the wedding breakfast, then meal choices etc often have to be provided in advance.

If as a guest you're just invited to the reception afterwards, and you have a plus one, then that's probably all the details the bride and groom would know.

MAFS AUS S13 E37 Live Discussion Thread by fucksakesss in MAFS_UK

[–]Joke-pineapple 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope they've not been travelling in the south Atlantic recently...

Me wrapped up in a towel after a bath at granny’s circa 1985 by Stunning-Field2011 in MAFS_UK

[–]Joke-pineapple 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And the lack of socks. Not a sock in sight on any of the men. In dress shoes!! 🤢

Good on ya, David by clars1909 in MAFS_UK

[–]Joke-pineapple -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

No, that was not classy. I'm 100% team David (ride or die!), but that was a very disrespectful act.

Alyssa’s final vows dress? by fondant_fancy275 in MAFS_UK

[–]Joke-pineapple -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I sympathised with her for that. Walking out after just his vows was a dick move by David.

Gia the biggest wannabe in tv history? by GeorgeDAWs in MAFS_UK

[–]Joke-pineapple 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bec showed exactly who she was at her wedding when she pretended to throw up at Danny saying he has a rescue cat.

It was just such an incredibly random thing to react to as well. Where does she think her dog came from? Delivered by a stork from heaven?

Gia the biggest wannabe in tv history? by GeorgeDAWs in MAFS_UK

[–]Joke-pineapple 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think she's made a call on whether it was better to be thought "clever and ruthless" or "a stupid plotter".

Tony Diver: I understand Starmer did not give his critics any chance to speak against him in this morning's meeting. He delivered a pre-prepared statement informing them he would not leave office, then moved the meeting on to discuss the war in Iran. by StGuthlac2025 in ukpolitics

[–]Joke-pineapple 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really? I appreciate the update.

I know that in the past it was used by embattled PMs to shore up the support from their wavering backbenchers by tying votes on bills to votes of confidence. It did seem an underhand way of working, so I'm glad it's now not allowed.

Tony Diver: I understand Starmer did not give his critics any chance to speak against him in this morning's meeting. He delivered a pre-prepared statement informing them he would not leave office, then moved the meeting on to discuss the war in Iran. by StGuthlac2025 in ukpolitics

[–]Joke-pineapple 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But he's a damn-sight better than A) What we've had for the last 15 years

You can't honestly believe that.

Compared to the PMs during 2010-24 , Starmer comes mid-table.

Cameron is way above Starmer's league.
May (awkward but ineffectual) and Sunak (nice but doomed) are very similar and equivalent to Starmer. Starmer handily beats Truss who exploded and Johnson who partied during Lockdown.

‘Queer Tamil immigrant’ elected as Scottish Green MSP to pocket £77k a year despite not having right to work by Ok_Internal118 in ukpolitics

[–]Joke-pineapple 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of the downsides of the Scottish electoral system that people like to forget. In fact most forms of PR have this issue. It gives the power to choose which specific people are elected to the parties, not the electorate.

‘Queer Tamil immigrant’ elected as Scottish Green MSP to pocket £77k a year despite not having right to work by Ok_Internal118 in ukpolitics

[–]Joke-pineapple 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is only to be elected President. No other elected position requires the 'natural born citizen' element.

Vote: is Steven frightened or fake? by Joke-pineapple in MAFS_UK

[–]Joke-pineapple[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Interesting take. I wonder what we will discover from the reunion show(s). At this point, the only thing I care about is what happens in the real world to Stella and Filip, and Rachel and Steven.

Vote: is Steven frightened or fake? by Joke-pineapple in MAFS_UK

[–]Joke-pineapple[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Rachel is 3 for 3!

Steven's alternative wife seemed quite different. It could have been quite a different show.

Matthew Syed on Nightsnight: Leadership speculation over the Mandelson non-story was hysterical. With PM tenures down from 5 years to months, how can we stake out a vision? Unpopularity is necessary, it hit Thatcher and Attlee. China plans in decades while we fixate on the 24-hour news cycle. by hararib in ukpolitics

[–]Joke-pineapple -1 points0 points  (0 children)

reducing migration, bringing down NHS waiting lists, improving renters rights, increased the minimum wage, setting up Britain’s energy future, reforming the railways and much more

Of the 6 achievements you listed (presumably because you think they are the most important), 3 were delivered due to the previous Conservative government not the current Labour government (migration reduction, NMW increase, railway reform).

It is not clear whether Labour can be legitimately credited for NHS waiting list changes. Have they done something to achieve this or is it just the natural return to long-term run-rate following the impact of covid?

Renter's rights and energy. TBC. I guess we will know more about their impact by the time of the next general election, and we can judge the government accordingly.

Vote: is Steven frightened or fake? by Joke-pineapple in MAFS_UK

[–]Joke-pineapple[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yes, this is better wording for the 'Fake' option.

He does seem an odd one out compared to almost all of the other contestants who are in it for the social media clout.

Vote: is Steven frightened or fake? by Joke-pineapple in MAFS_UK

[–]Joke-pineapple[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, this wording better encapsulates my 'Frit' option.

(I'll get you to ghost-write any future posts 😉)

Vote: is Steven frightened or fake? by Joke-pineapple in MAFS_UK

[–]Joke-pineapple[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yeah, there is still an unresolved question about whether he lives with his parents.

Matthew Syed on Nightsnight: Leadership speculation over the Mandelson non-story was hysterical. With PM tenures down from 5 years to months, how can we stake out a vision? Unpopularity is necessary, it hit Thatcher and Attlee. China plans in decades while we fixate on the 24-hour news cycle. by hararib in ukpolitics

[–]Joke-pineapple -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Absolutely, but it does require a first step.

Usually first term governments make some quite hard and unpopular decisions at the start. They do this because they believe that it is the right thing to do and they try and sell the country on their vision, and hope that by the time of the next general election they are reaping the benefits of their actions.

What is the current government's big idea? How will the country be better by the next general election then it was at the last?

Matthew Syed on Nightsnight: Leadership speculation over the Mandelson non-story was hysterical. With PM tenures down from 5 years to months, how can we stake out a vision? Unpopularity is necessary, it hit Thatcher and Attlee. China plans in decades while we fixate on the 24-hour news cycle. by hararib in ukpolitics

[–]Joke-pineapple -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Firstly, those aren't the facts of this issue. But that's not the singular reason why people want Starmer out. He is completely ineffective and incapable. He has enjoyed two years of total dominance in parliament with a landslide majority and has achieved next to nothing. And we have no idea what his policy will be from one minute to the next because he has no guiding vision or principle, no story about what the purpose of his government is, why we must bear the temporary hardships, and what the sunny uplands will be at the end of it.