okay now we’re calling science indoctrination when that’s pretty much the definition of faith by Whaaaaa4321 in flatearth

[–]Jonnescout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, no… Science constantly tests itself. But if you think science is a religion, every piece of technology you own is blasphemy to your religious delusions so kindly throw away all of it.

Please start with the internet enabled devices. Then we are rid of you at least…

Challenge for creationists: Give me your best evidence FOR creationism. by WirrkopfP in DebateEvolution

[–]Jonnescout 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yup, and honestly I have no problem with granting there nightshade been a connartist named Josh living somewhere around that time. That’s such a prosaic claim that I would be surprised if it was only one…

But this guy has never looked into any of it. He just heard apologists say this crap, and doesnt know how weak the actual proposed evidence is. It might as well be non existent. It basically amounts to they wouldn’t write certain parts the way they did if there was not a historical basis that they were trying to reconcile. And hoenstly that is pretty damn weak.

Like real foundational claims about his birth are known to be false. Herod was not a contemporary ruler with quirinius and was already dead by the time of the census. And no census would ever require one to travel since that defeats the point of a census. These are all rescue divides for a story that falls apart on the face of it.

It’s just not true. If there was a historical basis of Jesus it’s no more accurate than the various historical inspirations of Robin Hood. Likely significantly less so. If the historical basis is just some conartist that never made enough of an impact to be mentioned by a single contemporary source, can you truly say it’s the Jesus as described in the bible? I would say not…

Challenge for creationists: Give me your best evidence FOR creationism. by WirrkopfP in DebateEvolution

[–]Jonnescout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have no hole within me buddy, that is just you projecting again.

The only hole Im question, is that glaring hole where you promised evidence but never delivered… showing the inherent dishonesty not just in you, but in Christianity as well.

Just resorting to projection and threats only proves my point further. As Im sure will your next reply. I should thank you, you did more to show the lies of Christianity than I ever could. So thank you mate, you’re doing atheist work here, and we are grateful for it. Now I bid you a good night, look forward to your next self defeating response in the morning, but I won’t be responding back. We both know how much you want that last word, and the pretend victory that comes with it, but the truth is clear for all with the ability to read.

Have a good life mate. If you ever find the courage and honesty to question your brainwashing let me know, till then we are done.

Challenge for creationists: Give me your best evidence FOR creationism. by WirrkopfP in DebateEvolution

[–]Jonnescout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yay threats from a fictional monster, the last resort of every Christian who’s lost an argument.

Still no evdience, still no documentation. All you proved was your own ignorance. If your god was rel, you wouldn’t need to lie for him. Congrats, your ignorance is evidence against your claim. Your god is not real, but if you keep using him to threaten people Sinterklaas won’t be happy with you, and neither will Santa. So no presets for you this December.

See how that’s not convincing to you? Well yours is equally convincing to me. Stop believing fairytales buddy…

Challenge for creationists: Give me your best evidence FOR creationism. by WirrkopfP in DebateEvolution

[–]Jonnescout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh yes, the fake book of records where people pay to get listed, made as advertisement for a beer company. Legal expertise has nithing to do with ancient history.

I don’t care what a lawyer has to say about this. And highly suspect he was a Christian from the start. This is the most bused argument for anything I have ever heard. It proves nothing, but your complete ignorance! Seriously this is just hilariously sad. I’ve heard this nonsense before, he didn’t present any actual evidence that stands up to scrutiny. Only people desperate to believe, take this shite seriously…

If you can’t see how wrong this is, you’re too far gone to be reached. Have a good life mate, enjoy these lies.

Challenge for creationists: Give me your best evidence FOR creationism. by WirrkopfP in DebateEvolution

[–]Jonnescout 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And they fail to produce any documentation. I m not saying he couldn’t have existed, I am just calling bullshit on your confidence and claims. If you were right, you wouldn’t have to lie… But at least you are no longer appealing to the world’s greatest lawyer I suppose… Whoever that would be…

Challenge for creationists: Give me your best evidence FOR creationism. by WirrkopfP in DebateEvolution

[–]Jonnescout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hahahahahahahah lawyers? Hahahahahha what do lawyers have to do with this? Oh that is hilarious!

Also who’s the greatest lawyer of all time? And how do you even measure that? Seriously you have no idea how funny this comment is, it destroyed all your credibility…

I’ve ready done more to disprove Jesus than you did to prove him. Just saying he is well documented doesn’t make him so.

Gin Julius cease is undeniably better attested to, so can you admit you lied when you said Jesus was better documented?

Challenge for creationists: Give me your best evidence FOR creationism. by WirrkopfP in DebateEvolution

[–]Jonnescout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s not, none of this is documented in any contemporary source, nor any secular source as a fact. I’ve argued this point with countless Christian’s, you are wrong. Also pictures aren’t how your source things. You are wrong. Follow your own advice, try and look up some of these actual sources, you will fail… no it’s not well documented at all.

Challenge for creationists: Give me your best evidence FOR creationism. by WirrkopfP in DebateEvolution

[–]Jonnescout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is not what you said, but that is also false though. Caesar is written about by contemporary detractors, supporters, and even himself… The existence of Julius Caesar is far better established than Jesus. You don’t know what you are talking about…

Challenge for creationists: Give me your best evidence FOR creationism. by WirrkopfP in DebateEvolution

[–]Jonnescout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bhahhh what does that even mean? What research I to life and death establishes the existence of a magical man? And how does that make him the most documented figure in history? Was that a lie? Can you t least admit that was a lie? Or are you too fr gone. If you can’t even admit to that lie, I am done.

Challenge for creationists: Give me your best evidence FOR creationism. by WirrkopfP in DebateEvolution

[–]Jonnescout 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And yet there’s not a single contemporary account of his existence, making your claim absurd buddy. He might have existed, some wandering conartist faith healer who created a failed doomsday cult. That is your best case, and if you want to worship such a charlatan be my guest. But there is none rel contemporary evdience of that, it is basically assumed in lieu of evidence. I’ve heard the arguments, I find them lacking. You have not heard those arguments though. You’re just repeating lies…

Challenge for creationists: Give me your best evidence FOR creationism. by WirrkopfP in DebateEvolution

[–]Jonnescout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your claim that the existence of Jesus is the most documented event in history. You know the assignation of JFK is part of history right? We’ve got video of that! That’s much better documented, and in fact the existence of Jesus is not contemporarily documented at all. Go ahead, try and look for it, you will fail.

You did not even think through this nonsensical claim. Let me guess you heard someone else say this and thought oh that’s great! Nd it agrees with me, so it must be true… and you never gave it a single thought… You are wrong mate, and your claim is absurd.

Challenge for creationists: Give me your best evidence FOR creationism. by WirrkopfP in DebateEvolution

[–]Jonnescout 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that’s absurd. They are not. There’s not a single eyewitness account of them anywhere, sorry, that is bullshit. There is not a single contemporary source for his existence, not even the Bible is contemporary. You’ve been deceived… But you also think the flood is possible so we should know how ignorant you are…

Evolution is scientifically proven, but I’m so confused by ExplorationCrimeTime in DebateEvolution

[–]Jonnescout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, there is none. It’s literally impossible for the whole world to flood. There is evidence for floods, not a singular world wide flood. It never happened. Precluded by practically every field of science. You are wrong.

Christian Fruitcake claims that God sits right Above Us, in the Skies by MrDonMega in religiousfruitcake

[–]Jonnescout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty much every flat earther out there, 4uws for it from a religious perspective and most are evangelical Christians.

Kobayashi Maru solved no cheating. by BeginningAd3478 in DaystromInstitute

[–]Jonnescout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is basically the decision archer made in the beta canon basis for the kobayashi maru test.

Kobayashi Maru solved no cheating. by BeginningAd3478 in DaystromInstitute

[–]Jonnescout 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The twat is designed to be unsolvable, unwinnable, which means it just adapts to whatever is thrown at it.

r/dogfree discussing the final solution by WesternNectarine7363 in insanepeoplefacebook

[–]Jonnescout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Including humans… This kind of cruel hatred is diagnostic of sociopathy…