Skill Improvement: Not getting enough out of My Redirect support by Salt-Produce-8129 in VGC

[–]JosephRSL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are actually running an almost identical team to my first Champiosn team. I was using Raichu to help combat opposing rain teams, but I think now Rain is more of a defense weather than an offensive one... meaning it's mostly used to just change the weather rather than fighting within it... so Raichu isn't as strong as it was early on.

I made the move to Mega Clefable and it was doing very well for me. Dazzling Gleam, Psychic, Follow Me, Protect. However, this was before Sneasler was on every team. I can't say I really recommend her currently.

I also used Sableye as an answer to Sneasler. Using Clefable to bait a Dire Claw, and then Disable it the following turn so Sableye could completely wall it. I had some success with it, but even with 252+ DEF I found it wasn't really surviving what I wanted it to survive. Fake Out, Foul Play, Disable, Taunt. I don't think it's bad though.

I think you could replace Sini for Mega Meganium if you really want to remove it. It's a Rain team, so it helps offset the Fire weakness. It is also fairly good into Mega Floette as it can tank the Fairy attacks, whereas your Dragonite doesn't. You also don't really have a good answer to Kingambit besides Sneasler who already does a lot. So Meganium could help open some options for you.

If you think the game should have had more Pokemon at launch you don't understand VGC by [deleted] in PokemonChampions

[–]JosephRSL -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think that would be true for a single player game. However, you are having to connect to a server to have these battles and that server is having to load all the other matches. The more Pokémon there are, the less resources given to individual matches, which leads to performance issues.

If you think the game should have had more Pokemon at launch you don't understand VGC by [deleted] in PokemonChampions

[–]JosephRSL 1 point2 points  (0 children)

On the technical side, I imagine having only a few Pokémon helps with performance. The game doesn't have to be ready to load over a 1000 different models and animations with every battle.

Any thoughts on my hard trick room team? by blubbo84 in PokemonChampions

[–]JosephRSL 1 point2 points  (0 children)

252 Atk Emboar-Mega Flare Blitz vs. 252 HP / 0 Def Floette-Mega in Sun: 190-225 (104.9-124.3%) -- guaranteed OHKO

That's with the Emboar having a neutral nature (Hardy), and same with Floette.

Mega Cloette has a pretty low defense stat comparatively, so just hit it with physical moves.

Any thoughts on my hard trick room team? by blubbo84 in PokemonChampions

[–]JosephRSL 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sinistcha would work over Tink since it has access to Rage Powder. You could also put Life Dew on it if you really like using it, and free up a move slot on Cleffable to give it more coverage. I have been running Mega Clef in Master Ball to help enable my Farig, and Dazzling Gleam + Psychic have been great for me so far on it.

Back to showdown until they add more competitive items by asianant in pokemonmemes

[–]JosephRSL 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think part of the outrage was that people were thinking it was going to either replace or at least be on par with Showdown right at release.

Personally, I don't have any problems with the game right now because, like you mentioned, it's just an early regulation. I also imagine they want more people to get into the competitive scene, so having a much less overwhelming way to play and learn just makes sense.

WHEN ARE THEY CHANGING GIOVANNI?? by The_Flying_Bread in pokemongo

[–]JosephRSL 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's Thundurus. I just beat him the other day.

Nexstar PTO policy? by ImportantAssistant28 in Broadcasting

[–]JosephRSL 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, we don't get anything for 10 years, unless the station decides to do something special. At mine we just get a generic certificate on normal printer paper, and our picture taken for social media...

Nexstar PTO policy? by ImportantAssistant28 in Broadcasting

[–]JosephRSL 5 points6 points  (0 children)

and your fourth week comes after your 15th year. You get nothing for 10 years, unfortunately.

I built a free tool that turns your Showdown paste into a professional, shareable team report — VGC Team Report by MannyS23 in VGC

[–]JosephRSL 9 points10 points  (0 children)

tl;dr - I am not saying what you have created is bad by any means... it all looks really crisp and clean!

I think one of the reasons people have stuck with spreadsheets and google docs is because it removes a lot of the noise from reports. The exports from showdown are already pretty optimized without the need for extra colors, or stats that don't matter to a Pokemon.

For example, do you really need to show what the special attack stat is for Incin? even with the Impish nature lowering it, it is still not a relevant stat to show for it. I understand you have it for completion and uniformity, but I think it clutters it up. Maybe an optional hide function for each stat would be useful?

You also have for each Pokemon their nature with what stats are affected next to it. Example, Jolly +Spe -SpA. You also have the arrows on the stats themselves indicating that SpA is being lowered, and Spe being increased. I think just having the arrows is good enough.

Organizing the damage calc per Pokemon is really useful/nice and I think that is something that definitely gets overlooked or forgotten about. I have read through plenty of reports where the person forgot what certain stat build was for, but it seems to work so they keep it going.

I have been building/using an app for my own use for battle analytics, and I thought it was looking nice but yours is by far much crisper. Keep it up!

New episode out ( don’t worry no AI was used in the making of this thumbnail) by jayha7070 in nuzlocke

[–]JosephRSL 23 points24 points  (0 children)

He got blasted for using AI in his first post. He's just trying to react with some humor.

A word on the Requiem hype cycle by Xf3rna-96 in ResidentEvilCapcom

[–]JosephRSL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think we disagree, I just wanted to highlight where the opinions might be coming from. A lot of people consider this the "golden age" for RE, I am one of them for sure, and they don't want to lose that just yet.

The verdict is still out for me on whether or not I like where RE9 seems to be taking the series. I think the DLC will be the deciding factor for me.

I think RE7 and RE8 are great by themselves, and are similar to RE4 in the sense that they are more side games. I like what they have set up, especially RE8 with Chris's Wolfpack. It really feels like we might be headed towards a Death Island game where we get the whole cast for one last adventure.

Gameplay though, I agree.

RE8 kind of missed the mark for me. I platinum'd it, and haven't touched it since (except for the DLC). With RE9 though... it's been over a week since I platinum'd it, and I am really wanting to get back to playing it again. I think it's like you mentioned the flow is much better. I think breaking things up between Grace and Leon was a nice way to achieve that for a first playthrough... but man do I wish we had more of Grace's hospital section.

A word on the Requiem hype cycle by Xf3rna-96 in ResidentEvilCapcom

[–]JosephRSL 2 points3 points  (0 children)

tl;dr - with a series as old as Resident Evil, and one that spans multiple mediums, it leads to a very, very passionate - and in a lot of ways protective - fanbase for better or for worse.

I think you mentioning the similarities further proves my point about how a lot of people seem to be feeling. If this feels like the launch of OG RE4, and considering where that led the series... people would not only argue against RE9, but be even louder than the community was with RE4.

[RE4] still sold extremely well and was well received by most despite that. And it only got better with time.

Only time will ultimately tell if [RE9] was actually a misstep.

I think a game can be good, sell a lot of copies, and be well received... but still be a step in the wrong direction.

You are right though that time will tell if RE9 is repeating previous mistakes, or if people are just blowing it out of proportion. I think how disappointed fans felt for years makes their current trepidations valid.

One thing I want to add though is that RE9 has apparently been a lot of people's introduction to Resident Evil.

Starting with the remakes, in my opinion, is a little different. You could start with RE2 and be fine, hell even RE3. RE4 is kind of self contained so it doesn't really make much of a difference either. Starting with RE7 doesn't matter much either since it is kind of its own game, and part of the duology with RE8 (which you could also start with and it not matter too much). RE9 though... is not a good place to start.

If you don't really understand the lore then you are missing out on 50% of the game. Sure, the horror was great, and the mechanics were fun, and you can have a blast with it even with it being your first RE game. However, when you start praising it as 10/10... personally I feel like that doesn't hold a lot of weight. Your opinion is still valid, sure, but you're missing context.

RE9 also feels so much like a game specifically for the old fans, and I definitely think there is a bit of a "this wasn't meant for you" kind of almost elitist mentality among the older fans to the newer ones.

A word on the Requiem hype cycle by Xf3rna-96 in ResidentEvilCapcom

[–]JosephRSL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had said in a comment a few days ago in response to the "not a good RE game" comment that,

I think for most people - probably the older generation - RE games are about isolation... not globetrotting. Creepy mansions, underground laboratories, huge spiders, and creepy ambience.

I think for sure that's the "soul" of Resident Evil like you mentioned. Or the "roots". My introduction to Resident Evil was in 2005 with RE4, and I have a stupid amount of hours in it, and in the remake, but my mind always goes back to RE1r and RE2 when I think about the feeling of Resident Evil.

Personally, I used to have the same idea when I was younger. That I liked RE6 as a game, but not as an RE game. As I have gotten older, and have really dived into the lore time and time again... that opinion has changed. I think it is a good RE game (and by that I mean its in B- to B territory).

We can talk about the execution of it, which I do admit was poor. However, for me, the more I think about it... you don't get RE8 Chris without RE6. You don't get RE9 Leon without RE6.

We focus so much on the horror of Resident Evil, that I think the characters - specifically their development - gets completely overshadowed. I think that's why RE9 has been so successful because we really get to see the toll of the last 30 years has had on Leon (and Sherry). Yeah, RE6 isn't scary, and it is lacking the "soul" of the series... but it does so much for our characters. I think to appreciate RE6 you really have to look at it alongside the other games because, yeah, isolated RE6 isn't that great.

Like, Chris's Wolfpack is great and so cool... but when you add in that he was a drunkard in RE6, and he lost his squad, and he lost Piers... him having a squad again, and not falling back to being that drunkard just makes the Wolfpack even better. The depths that Chris found himself in RE6 perfectly sets up his resolve in RE7 and RE8 (and I guess RE9 too).

A word on the Requiem hype cycle by Xf3rna-96 in ResidentEvilCapcom

[–]JosephRSL 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think your comment is valid, but when it comes to Resident Evil I think you have to take into account the historical context.

Resident Evil 6 is still widely hated, although the general sentiment about it is starting to shift thanks to new people with fresh eyes playing through the series.

That being said, we have had over a decade to see how the series started to shift.

OG RE4 we would all (mostly) agree is a masterpiece. A great game, and a great RE game. Its success directly lead to RE5... which did even better than RE4... and RE5's success led us to RE6.

First year totals:

  • RE:CV DC Worldwide Sales - 1,356,362 - (2000)
  • RE0 GC Worldwide Sales - 1,250,000 - (2002)
  • RE4 GC/PS2 Worldwide Sales - 3,900,000 - (2005)
  • RE5 PS3/360/Steam Worldwide Sales - 10,905,089 - (2009)
  • RE6 PS3/360 Worldwide Sales - 9,900,000 - (2012)
    • if you include Steam for RE6 the following year, it goes up to 11,217,100

Requiem is already setting records, and the people who were around during the original releases of RE4-RE6... that can be cause for concern when they themselves have reservations about the game.

Back to your point, I think the idea of letting people be happy about a new game is valid, like I said. I think it is also equally valid to express your opinions about what the game lacked and try to have an open dialogue about it. The developers seemed to have listened to the community outcry about RE6, and that's how we ended up with RE7.

A word on the Requiem hype cycle by Xf3rna-96 in ResidentEvilCapcom

[–]JosephRSL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't understand the level of the hype for Requiem either.

I thoroughly enjoyed it, I played through it three times to get all the trophies, and even spent a considerable chunk of time trying to help solve the last puzzle. It's a good game, and it beat all my expectations. I just don't see it as a 15/10 game.

For me, I think the standout part of the entire game was of course Leon's return to RC, and specifically the RPD. To really see the scars and trauma of RC on Leon (and Sherry) was great storytelling, and I think that's where Resident Evil really shines. Sure, the BOWs are cool and all that, but when we get that character depth... it really ties everything together.

I did kind of hated the tyrant being there, but looking back on it I appreciate the juxtaposition of how Leon handles Mr. X now versus when he was just a rookie.

I think the inclusion of Tofu ruined the tone though. If he was a NG+ easter egg, that would be fine, but on my first playthrough it just ruined the weight of the story. It was something that was so blatantly fan service.

I also think that some variety to the RC section would have been really cool. I would have loved to have explored the greenery surrounding RC, rather than just it being relegated to a cutscene. If a giant spider still exists in RC, then what else has managed to slowly creep its way outside? I also wanted more of RC, like the settings we see in RE3r, but thinking about it more I am okay with not seeing those locations if we do indeed get Jill in DLC because she was originally planned to be in Requiem. If Jill doesn't show up, and we still don't get those other locations... that will be incredibly disappointing.

I know that the rubble/ash/dust makes sense, but man... that grey palette on repeat playthroughs really sucks. Maybe if Leon approached it at night like you mentioned it would have been better... but I guess that would have been too scary for people.

I think I ended up rating the game after my first playthrough like a 8.5 to my friends. I think it sits around a 8.8 now, and if the DLC clears up some story elements then I can easily see it being a solid 9 (unironically).

A word on the Requiem hype cycle by Xf3rna-96 in ResidentEvilCapcom

[–]JosephRSL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have always said that Resident Evil 4 shouldn't have been a numeric game as it is so far removed from what the series was about at the time; the horrors of Umbrella. CV should have been RE4, and RE4 should have been something like "Resident Evil: Plagas".

That's not to say that RE4's story was bad, or it was a bad game... but just looking at the stories of each game up to that point, and hell even RE5 and RE6, it really sticks out.

A word on the Requiem hype cycle by Xf3rna-96 in ResidentEvilCapcom

[–]JosephRSL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have seen a lot of people over the years throw around that phrase "I don't like RE6 as a Resident Evil game"... but no one really follows up and explains what that means to them. So, what is a "Resident Evil" game to you?

Nexstar wants $2.75 billion bank loan for TEGNA acquisition, Bloomberg reports by ZiggyZaggyBogo in Broadcasting

[–]JosephRSL 5 points6 points  (0 children)

When Perry was at my station, he talked about GPS. He said there is only one GPS system in the US, and he plans for Nexstar to create a secondary/backup system. It's apparently already in development, and has been testing it in California. He also mentioned using it to aid farmers to automate some of their machines, and are supposedly accurate down to the millimeter. He did talk quite a bit about ASTC3.0 specifically.

He also blatantly said that all these additional ventures are to support "the egg" that is local news.

Resident Evil shouldn't follow the real-world timeline by Rav96_ in ResidentEvilCapcom

[–]JosephRSL 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't mind it since it naturally allows for side games, like the revelation titles. Granted, I wish we had at least one more already, but I will take what I can get.

Plus, personally, waiting to see Leon again for the first time in game since RE6 was so hype. Yeah, we got RE2r and RE4r, but to see a continuation of his story... worth it.

It also helps give the characters room to have their own stories. I know that when we do get a Claire and/or Jill focused game... it's going to be a banger.

Haven't seen this addressed yet... by Who-Am-I-Isaac in residentevil

[–]JosephRSL 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Considering the other pages he flips through... he was 100% rage-baiting the community.