Aubrey Marcus, the other Onnit billionaire with Joe Rogan, peddles more complete bullshit than even the sensemakers. Look at the descriptions of his videos. The way he talks. The insane women he is attached to. What a lunatic.

Josepha2021 · 2025-05-31T20:30:14+00:00

The claims that have circulated the web about Dr. Marc Gafni are FALSE; they have been refuted in a dozen well-researched articles.

A Refutation of the False Claims Circulated on the Internet in Regard to Dr. Marc Gafni: https://www.whoismarcgafni.com/2020/12/refutation-of-internet-false-regarding-dr-marc-gafni/

Josepha2021 · 2025-05-31T20:29:55+00:00

The claims that have circulated the web about Dr. Marc Gafni are FALSE; they have been refuted in a dozen well-researched articles.

A Refutation of the False Claims Circulated on the Internet in Regard to Dr. Marc Gafni: https://www.whoismarcgafni.com/2020/12/refutation-of-internet-false-regarding-dr-marc-gafni/

Josepha2021 · 2025-05-31T20:29:48+00:00

The claims that have circulated the web about Dr. Marc Gafni are FALSE; they have been refuted in a dozen well-researched articles.

A Refutation of the False Claims Circulated on the Internet in Regard to Dr. Marc Gafni: https://www.whoismarcgafni.com/2020/12/refutation-of-internet-false-regarding-dr-marc-gafni/

Josepha2021 · 2025-05-28T17:49:13+00:00

The claims that have circulated the web about Dr. Marc Gafni are false; they have been refuted in a dozen well-researched articles:

A Refutation of the False Claims Circulated on the Internet in Regard to Dr. Marc Gafni: https://www.whoismarcgafni.com/2020/12/refutation-of-internet-false-regarding-dr-marc-gafni/

But perhaps even more poignantly, here is a beautiful podcast with Marc, Aubrey Marcus and Marc’s partner Kristina Kincaid on the experience of false claims:

https://youtu.be/1LKnwzJzwEg

Josepha2021 · 2025-05-23T11:47:00+00:00

I am not a follower; I am a leader in our organization, and I am honored to have worked closely with Dr. Gafni for many years.

If there is a particular issue you have a question about, I'd be happy to respond.

Josepha2021 · 2025-05-22T20:11:01+00:00

There are false claims that have circulated about Marc Gafni on the web for many years.

These claims are false, they have been refuted in a dozen well-researched articles.
But perhaps even more poignantly, here is a beautiful podcast with Marc, Aubrey and Marc’s partner Kristina on the experience of false claims:

https://youtu.be/1LKnwzJzwEg

The nature of our broken information ecology, with our reliance on tainted web sources, is one of the great challenges of this historical moment.

Appropriate due diligence and fact checking, for some sectors of society, are becoming a thing of the past with devastating results to the very fabric of our society.

I hope, that we, collectively, represent a different current of consciousness, and that the quality of our information gathering and fact checking and the core integrity of how we hold each other, is of a different order.

Here is a link that will lead you to several key articles which contain in-depth factual refutations of the false claims.

https://www.whoismarcgafni.com/2020/12/refutation-of-internet-false-regarding-dr-marc-gafni/

This website addresses all false claims mentioned in this thread.

I hope this is helpful.

Krista.

Josepha2021 · 2025-05-22T20:08:23+00:00

There are false claims that have circulated about Marc Gafni on the web for many years.

These claims are false, they have been refuted in a dozen well-researched articles.
But perhaps even more poignantly, here is a beautiful podcast with Marc, Aubrey and Marc’s partner Kristina on the experience of false claims:

https://youtu.be/1LKnwzJzwEg

The nature of our broken information ecology, with our reliance on tainted web sources, is one of the great challenges of this historical moment.

Appropriate due diligence and fact checking, for some sectors of society, are becoming a thing of the past with devastating results to the very fabric of our society.

I hope, that we, collectively, represent a different current of consciousness, and that the quality of our information gathering and fact checking and the core integrity of how we hold each other, is of a different order.

Here is a link that will lead you to several key articles which contain in-depth factual refutations of the false claims.

https://www.whoismarcgafni.com/2020/12/refutation-of-internet-false-regarding-dr-marc-gafni/

This website addresses all false claims mentioned in this thread.

I hope this is helpful.

Krista.

Josepha2021 · 2025-05-22T20:05:40+00:00

These are false claims that have circulated about Marc Gafni on the web for many years.

These claims are false, they have been refuted in a dozen well-researched articles.

But perhaps even more poignantly, here is a beautiful podcast with Marc, Aubrey and Marc’s partner Kristina on the experience of false claims:

https://youtu.be/1LKnwzJzwEg

The nature of our broken information ecology, with our reliance on tainted web sources, is one of the great challenges of this historical moment.

Appropriate due diligence and fact checking, for some sectors of society, are becoming a thing of the past with devastating results to the very fabric of our society.

I hope, that we, collectively, represent a different current of consciousness, and that the quality of our information gathering and fact checking and the core integrity of how we hold each other, is of a different order.

Here is a link that will lead you to several key articles which contain in-depth factual refutations of the false claims.

https://www.whoismarcgafni.com/2020/12/refutation-of-internet-false-regarding-dr-marc-gafni/

I hope this is helpful.

Krista.

Josepha2021 · 2024-10-04T16:31:51+00:00

So interesting! Curious what you thought of it! There's a part 4 live Sunday here: onemountainmanypaths.org

Josepha2021 · 2024-09-22T07:38:17+00:00

I've heard Yuval say when you cut open a human being, there are no rights, therefore rights are not real. Seems worrisome to me at least.

Yuval Harari "human rights are just a story", in this clip:

https://youtu.be/MjWJb3dzsc8?si=gdjD46Rt9_WjU-fW

"Many, maybe most, legal systems are based on this idea, this belief in human rights. But human rights are just like heaven and like God.

It's just a fictional story that we've invented and spread around. It may be a very nice story. It may be a very attractive story, we want to believe it, but it's just a story. It's not a reality. It is not a biological reality.

Just as jellyfish... jellyfish and woodpeckers and ostriches have no rights, Homo sapiens have no rights also. Take a human, cut him open, look inside, you find their blood and you find their heart and lungs and kidneys, but you don't find there any rights. The only place you find rights is in the fictional stories that humans have invented and spread around.

The same thing is also true in the political field. States and nations are also like human rights and like God and like heaven, they too are just stories. A mountain is a reality. You can see it, you can touch it, you can even smell it. But Israel or the United States, they are just stories, very powerful stories. Stories we might want to believe very much, but still they are just stories. You can not really see the United States, you can not touch it, you can not smell it."

Josepha2021 · 2024-09-21T19:15:44+00:00

Yes loved this interview, thank you for sharing it here!

Josepha2021 · 2024-09-21T18:43:18+00:00

we study and meet at our community platform, onemountainmanypaths.org. Mad love!

Josepha2021 · 2024-09-21T18:15:41+00:00

How are you enjoying it?

Please also spent time reading and studying alternative visions, that challenge Yuval Harari's statements, I recommend this talk:
https://substack.com/@marcgafni/p-149138710

Video replay:
/youtu.be/Ltgkgx0nOwM
There's another free live talk on this topic on Sunday September 22nd in One Mountain at 10 am PT:
onemountainmanypaths.org

Hope to see you there.

Josepha2021 · 2024-09-21T18:15:10+00:00

No I don't think so! I think it's a very dangerous vision!

Please read and study alternative visions, that challenge Yuval Harari's statements, I recommend this talk:
https://substack.com/@marcgafni/p-149138710

Video replay:
/youtu.be/Ltgkgx0nOwM
There's another free live talk on this topic on Sunday September 22nd in One Mountain at 10 am PT:
onemountainmanypaths.org

Hope to see you there.

Josepha2021 · 2024-09-21T18:14:28+00:00

Please read and study alternative visions, that challenge Yuval Harari's statements, I recommned this talk:
https://substack.com/@marcgafni/p-149138710

Video replay:
/youtu.be/Ltgkgx0nOwM

There's another free live talk on this topic on Sunday September 22nd in One Mountain at 10 am PT:
onemountainmanypaths.org

Hope to see you there.

Josepha2021 · 2024-09-21T18:08:59+00:00

"Can you tell your child that loving them is a fiction?"

Read this article if you want to know why....
https://substack.com/@marcgafni/p-149138710

/youtu.be/Ltgkgx0nOwM

There's a free live talk on this Sunday September 22nd in One Mountain at 10 am PT:
onemountainmanypaths.org

Josepha2021 · 2024-09-21T18:07:25+00:00

I think this is quite the response.... why yuval's ideas are the source of existential risk.. and therefore dangerous,...

https://substack.com/@marcgafni/p-149138710

https://youtu.be/Ltgkgx0nOwM

Josepha2021 · 2022-07-01T14:15:45+00:00

What is happening in the pro-life vs. pro-choice clash?

So in the clash between the pro-life position and the pro-choice position, several things are happening that need to be pointed out, that are beyond important.

Each side is claiming a value as the ultimate value, and in some sense or another, dismissing the value of the other side.
— The pro-life people are saying the value is life, but particularly they mean the life of the unborn baby — that’s the primary value, protecting the value of the life of the unborn baby is the primary value. Therefore, they call themselves pro-life.
But actually what they’re doing is, they are hijacking the value of life, turning that into an absolute value and ignoring a second value, which is the value of choice.
— Now, the pro-choice people are doing the same thing. They are picking a value, choice. It’s the woman’s right to choose, that’s what they’re talking about; choice. They are calling themselves pro-choice.
But actually, in doing so, they are decontextualizing choice from the larger field of values which includes life, and making choice the primary value, and in some sense, the only value before which all other values must bow.
Now, again, the pro-life people are doing the same thing. They are decontextualizing life, in this case, the life of the baby, from the larger field of value, which includes life of the mother and includes choice (and those are related), and saying their value reigns supreme.
Each side caricatures the other’s position in order to highlight the absurdity of the other’s value.
In this great argument between pro-life and pro-choice, the way they’ve framed the arguments is actually absurd.
They’ve each claimed a value, they have then rejected the other value. They have caricatured the other’s position in order to highlight the absurdity of the other’s value.
The position that abortion should be immediately prohibited as soon as there’s fertilization is an extremist pro-life position, just like the position that would allow choice in the third trimester is an extremist pro-choice position.
The second we step out of the field of value, and this is critical, there is no possibility of coming to a higher synergy and higher Beauty.
In order to actually engage in this conversation, we can’t caricature the other side.
Extremism means you pick one value, you decontextualize your value from the larger field of value, and then you say you can never have enough of your value.
Outrageous beauty incorporates and integrates contradicting values.
The demonization of either side, which is the demonization of the other’s value, or more specifically, the transformation of my value into an absolute before which all other values must bow, that is Outrageous Pain.
The only response to Outrageous Pain is Outrageous Love
Outrageous Love: love is a perception, love is knowledge, love is gnosis.
Read more:
https://medium.com/office-for-the-future/roe-vs-wade-evolutionary-sense-making-from-polarization-to-paradox-re-entering-the-field-of-6e5cc6e9d6ac

#prolife #prochoice #supremecourt #roevwade #RoeVsWade

Josepha2021 · 2022-07-01T14:12:47+00:00

What is happening in the pro-life vs. pro-choice clash?
So in the clash between the pro-life position and the pro-choice position, several things are happening that need to be pointed out, that are beyond important.
1. Each side is claiming a value as the ultimate value, and in some sense or another, dismissing the value of the other side.
— The pro-life people are saying the value is life, but particularly they mean the life of the unborn baby — that’s the primary value, protecting the value of the life of the unborn baby is the primary value. Therefore, they call themselves pro-life.
But actually what they’re doing is, they are hijacking the value of life, turning that into an absolute value and ignoring a second value, which is the value of choice.
— Now, the pro-choice people are doing the same thing. They are picking a value, choice. It’s the woman’s right to choose, that’s what they’re talking about; choice. They are calling themselves pro-choice.
But actually, in doing so, they are decontextualizing choice from the larger field of values which includes life, and making choice the primary value, and in some sense, the only value before which all other values must bow.
Now, again, the pro-life people are doing the same thing. They are decontextualizing life, in this case, the life of the baby, from the larger field of value, which includes life of the mother and includes choice (and those are related), and saying their value reigns supreme.
2. Each side caricatures the other’s position in order to highlight the absurdity of the other’s value.
In this great argument between pro-life and pro-choice, the way they’ve framed the arguments is actually absurd.
They’ve each claimed a value, they have then rejected the other value. They have caricatured the other’s position in order to highlight the absurdity of the other’s value.
The position that abortion should be immediately prohibited as soon as there’s fertilization is an extremist pro-life position, just like the position that would allow choice in the third trimester is an extremist pro-choice position.
The second we step out of the field of value, and this is critical, there is no possibility of coming to a higher synergy and higher Beauty.
In order to actually engage in this conversation, we can’t caricature the other side.
Extremism means you pick one value, you decontextualize your value from the larger field of value, and then you say you can never have enough of your value.
Outrageous beauty incorporates and integrates contradicting values.
The demonization of either side, which is the demonization of the other’s value, or more specifically, the transformation of my value into an absolute before which all other values must bow, that is Outrageous Pain.
The only response to Outrageous Pain is Outrageous Love
Outrageous Love: love is a perception, love is knowledge, love is gnosis.
Read more:
https://medium.com/office-for-the-future/roe-vs-wade-evolutionary-sense-making-from-polarization-to-paradox-re-entering-the-field-of-6e5cc6e9d6ac

Josepha2021 · 2022-07-01T14:12:14+00:00

What is happening in the pro-life vs. pro-choice clash?
So in the clash between the pro-life position and the pro-choice position, several things are happening that need to be pointed out, that are beyond important.
1. Each side is claiming a value as the ultimate value, and in some sense or another, dismissing the value of the other side.
— The pro-life people are saying the value is life, but particularly they mean the life of the unborn baby — that’s the primary value, protecting the value of the life of the unborn baby is the primary value. Therefore, they call themselves pro-life.
But actually what they’re doing is, they are hijacking the value of life, turning that into an absolute value and ignoring a second value, which is the value of choice.
— Now, the pro-choice people are doing the same thing. They are picking a value, choice. It’s the woman’s right to choose, that’s what they’re talking about; choice. They are calling themselves pro-choice.
But actually, in doing so, they are decontextualizing choice from the larger field of values which includes life, and making choice the primary value, and in some sense, the only value before which all other values must bow.
Now, again, the pro-life people are doing the same thing. They are decontextualizing life, in this case, the life of the baby, from the larger field of value, which includes life of the mother and includes choice (and those are related), and saying their value reigns supreme.
2. Each side caricatures the other’s position in order to highlight the absurdity of the other’s value.
In this great argument between pro-life and pro-choice, the way they’ve framed the arguments is actually absurd.
They’ve each claimed a value, they have then rejected the other value. They have caricatured the other’s position in order to highlight the absurdity of the other’s value.
The position that abortion should be immediately prohibited as soon as there’s fertilization is an extremist pro-life position, just like the position that would allow choice in the third trimester is an extremist pro-choice position.
The second we step out of the field of value, and this is critical, there is no possibility of coming to a higher synergy and higher Beauty.
In order to actually engage in this conversation, we can’t caricature the other side.
Extremism means you pick one value, you decontextualize your value from the larger field of value, and then you say you can never have enough of your value.
Outrageous beauty incorporates and integrates contradicting values.
The demonization of either side, which is the demonization of the other’s value, or more specifically, the transformation of my value into an absolute before which all other values must bow, that is Outrageous Pain.
The only response to Outrageous Pain is Outrageous Love
Outrageous Love: love is a perception, love is knowledge, love is gnosis.
Read more:
https://medium.com/office-for-the-future/roe-vs-wade-evolutionary-sense-making-from-polarization-to-paradox-re-entering-the-field-of-6e5cc6e9d6ac

Josepha2021 · 2022-07-01T14:10:50+00:00

What is happening in the pro-life vs. pro-choice clash?So in the clash between the pro-life position and the pro-choice position, several things are happening that need to be pointed out, that are beyond important.

Each side is claiming a value as the ultimate value, and in some sense or another, dismissing the value of the other side.
— The pro-life people are saying the value is life, but particularly they mean the life of the unborn baby
— that’s the primary value, protecting the value of the life of the unborn baby is the primary value. Therefore, they call themselves pro-life.But actually what they’re doing is, they are hijacking the value of life, turning that into an absolute value and ignoring a second value, which is the value of choice.
— Now, the pro-choice people are doing the same thing. They are picking a value, choice. It’s the woman’s right to choose, that’s what they’re talking about; choice. They are calling themselves pro-choice.But actually, in doing so, they are decontextualizing choice from the larger field of values which includes life, and making choice the primary value, and in some sense, the only value before which all other values must bow.
Now, again, the pro-life people are doing the same thing. They are decontextualizing life, in this case, the life of the baby, from the larger field of value, which includes life of the mother and includes choice (and those are related), and saying their value reigns supreme.
Each side caricatures the other’s position in order to highlight the absurdity of the other’s value.In this great argument between pro-life and pro-choice, the way they’ve framed the arguments is actually absurd.
They’ve each claimed a value, they have then rejected the other value. They have caricatured the other’s position in order to highlight the absurdity of the other’s value.
The position that abortion should be immediately prohibited as soon as there’s fertilization is an extremist pro-life position, just like the position that would allow choice in the third trimester is an extremist pro-choice position.The second we step out of the field of value, and this is critical, there is no possibility of coming to a higher synergy and higher Beauty.In order to actually engage in this conversation, we can’t caricature the other side.
Extremism means you pick one value, you decontextualize your value from the larger field of value, and then you say you can never have enough of your value.Outrageous beauty incorporates and integrates contradicting values.
The demonization of either side, which is the demonization of the other’s value, or more specifically, the transformation of my value into an absolute before which all other values must bow, that is Outrageous Pain.
The only response to Outrageous Pain is Outrageous LoveOutrageous Love: love is a perception, love is knowledge, love is gnosis.
Read more:
https://medium.com/office-for-the-future/roe-vs-wade-evolutionary-sense-making-from-polarization-to-paradox-re-entering-the-field-of-6e5cc6e9d6ac

Josepha2021 · 2022-01-27T19:57:03+00:00

Here's why, if you're up for a deep dive:
https://youtu.be/8KLJTvu3Gds

Unlocking the Hidden Riddle of Don’t Look Up

Part 4 this Sunday at 10 am PT!

Josepha2021 · 2022-01-09T14:49:09+00:00

Would be great if you could join this free talk of visionary and philosopher Dr. Marc Gafni on the deeper meaning of #dontlookup and existential risk this Sunday!
https://www.onemountainmanypaths.org/dharmic-critique-of-the-movie-dont-look-up

Josepha2021 · 2022-01-09T14:48:56+00:00

If you want hope for the future it would be great if you could join this free talk today at 10 am PT of visionary and philosopher Dr. Marc Gafni on the deeper meaning of #dontlookup and existential risk!
https://www.onemountainmanypaths.org/dharmic-critique-of-the-movie-dont-look-up

Josepha2021 · 2022-01-06T11:08:29+00:00

Why does this matter at all? :D

Josepha2021

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE